AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Competitive Analysis

skill-ashermahonin-agentic-skills-competitive-analysis · by ashermahonin

Run competitive, adjacent-market, or alternative-solution analysis for product planning. Use when the project needs competitor scan, substitute workflow analysis, feature matrix, pricing or packaging comparison, positioning, wedge selection, blind-spot discovery, opportunity mapping, or `06-competitor-analysis.md` before product scope is locked.

No reviews yet
0 installs
39 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ashermahonin-agentic-skills-competitive-analysis

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-ashermahonin-agentic-skills-competitive-analysis)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Competitive Analysis? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Competitive Analysis

Role

Prevent the team from building in a vacuum. Compare the proposed product against real alternatives and translate that comparison into product choices, not generic market commentary.

Start By

  • Define the comparison category: direct competitors, substitutes, internal tools, manual workflows, or adjacent products.
  • Pick comparison criteria that matter to the target user.
  • Separate table-stakes features from differentiators.
  • Name the positioning question the analysis must answer.

Procedure

  1. Build a short list of alternatives with why each matters.
  2. Compare them on user workflow, capability, pricing, trust, onboarding, integrations, and switching cost when relevant.
  3. Call out gaps and over-served areas.
  4. Identify a wedge: the narrow reason this product should exist first.
  5. Translate findings into scope recommendations and product risks.

Principal-Level Defaults

  • Follow ../../routing/principal-operating-model.md before moving from analysis to implementation.
  • Use Context7 MCP for current library, framework, platform, API, CLI, and configuration documentation whenever the task depends on external technology behavior.
  • Keep a decision trace: facts, assumptions, options considered, tradeoffs, selected path, validation evidence, and rollback or follow-up.
  • Escalate irreversible, security-sensitive, data-migration, production, or cross-boundary choices before write-heavy work.

Output Artifacts

  • Alternative list
  • Feature and workflow matrix
  • Differentiation notes
  • Opportunity and risk summary
  • Scope recommendations

Quality Bar

  • Do not confuse feature count with product strength.
  • Prefer user workflow comparison over marketing-copy comparison.
  • Call out uncertainty when evidence is thin.
  • End with decisions the next skill can use.

Handoff

Hand off the wedge, table stakes, differentiators, and scope cautions to requirements and architecture.

References

  • references/matrix.md: Use this matrix format for competitor or alternative analysis.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.