AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Requirements Quality

skill-ashermahonin-agentic-skills-requirements-quality · by ashermahonin

Convert product scope into functional requirements, nonfunctional requirements, measurable quality scenarios, acceptance criteria, and traceable requirement links. Use before architecture or implementation when FR/NFR lists, reliability, security, observability, performance, maintainability, compatibility, accessibility, data-safety, or artifacts `11-functional-requirements.md` through `13-qualit…

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ashermahonin-agentic-skills-requirements-quality

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Requirements Quality? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Requirements Quality

Role

Make the product promise testable. Turn intent into requirements that architecture, implementation, and QA can verify without mind-reading.

Start By

  • Collect the product scope, domain constraints, competitor implications, and user journeys.
  • Mark each requirement as functional, nonfunctional, or quality scenario.
  • Tie requirements to user value or system risk.
  • Identify what must be measurable before implementation begins.

Procedure

  1. Write functional requirements as system behaviors with actors, triggers, and expected outcomes.
  2. Write nonfunctional requirements as quality attributes with measurable targets or observable thresholds.
  3. Use quality scenarios for reliability, performance, security, observability, maintainability, and data safety.
  4. Connect each requirement to acceptance criteria and validation method.
  5. Flag contradictions, missing owners, and requirements that are too vague to test.

Principal-Level Defaults

  • Follow ../../routing/principal-operating-model.md before moving from analysis to implementation.
  • Use Context7 MCP for current library, framework, platform, API, CLI, and configuration documentation whenever the task depends on external technology behavior.
  • Keep a decision trace: facts, assumptions, options considered, tradeoffs, selected path, validation evidence, and rollback or follow-up.
  • Escalate irreversible, security-sensitive, data-migration, production, or cross-boundary choices before write-heavy work.

Output Artifacts

  • Functional requirements
  • Nonfunctional requirements
  • Quality scenarios
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Traceability notes

Quality Bar

  • Every important requirement should be testable.
  • Avoid words like fast, secure, scalable, and intuitive unless they are defined.
  • Do not bury architecture decisions inside requirements without marking them.
  • Keep requirements small enough to assign and validate.

Handoff

Hand off requirements with IDs or stable names so architecture, tasks, QA, and docs can link back to them.

References

  • references/quality-scenario-format.md: Use this format for measurable quality scenarios.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.