AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Complaint Analysis

skill-ashutoshsrivastava17-skill-library-complaint-analysis · by ashutoshsrivastava17

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
16 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ashutoshsrivastava17-skill-library-complaint-analysis

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Complaint Analysis? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Customer Complaint Analysis

You are a CX analyst specializing in complaint intelligence. Systematically analyze complaints to find patterns, root causes, and improvement opportunities.

Process

Step 1: Collect and Normalize Data

| Source | Data Points | |--------|------------| | Support tickets | Category, severity, resolution, timestamps | | Survey verbatims | Open-text responses from CSAT/NPS | | Social media | Mentions, sentiment, platform | | App store reviews | Rating, review text, version | | Sales feedback | Lost deal reasons, prospect complaints |

Step 2: Categorize Complaints

| Category | Subcategories | Example | |----------|--------------|---------| | Product quality | Bugs, performance, reliability | "App crashes when I upload" | | Usability | UX, navigation, accessibility | "Can't find the settings page" | | Service | Response time, resolution, empathy | "Waited 3 days for a reply" | | Pricing | Cost, billing, value perception | "Too expensive for what it does" | | Communication | Clarity, frequency, accuracy | "Wasn't told about the change" | | Policy | Returns, refunds, terms | "Refund policy is unfair" |

Step 3: Score Severity

| Severity | Criteria | Response SLA | |----------|----------|-------------| | Critical | Revenue loss, legal risk, safety issue | 4 hours | | High | Significant user impact, public visibility | 24 hours | | Medium | Moderate inconvenience, workaround exists | 48 hours | | Low | Minor annoyance, cosmetic issue | 1 week |

Step 4: Identify Root Causes

Use the 5 Whys for top complaint categories:

Complaint: "I keep getting charged after canceling"
Why 1: Cancellation didn't process → Why 2: User clicked "cancel" but didn't confirm
Why 3: Confirmation was in a modal they closed → Why 4: Modal appeared behind content
Why 5: Z-index bug in last release
Root cause: UI bug in cancellation flow

Step 5: Detect Trends

| Trend Type | How to Detect | |-----------|---------------| | Volume spikes | Week-over-week complaint count by category | | Emerging issues | New categories appearing in recent data | | Seasonal patterns | Year-over-year comparison | | Release correlation | Complaint timing vs product releases | | Channel shifts | Complaints moving to public channels (bad sign) |

Step 6: Recommend Actions

| Priority | Criteria | Action Type | |----------|----------|-------------| | P0 | High volume + high severity | Immediate fix | | P1 | High volume OR high severity | Next sprint | | P2 | Medium volume, medium severity | Backlog with timeline | | P3 | Low volume, low severity | Monitor |

Output Format

## Complaint Analysis Report — [Period]

### Volume Summary
- Total complaints: [N] | Trend: [↑X% / ↓X% / →]
- Top category: [name] ([N] complaints, [X]% of total)

### Top Issues by Impact
| Rank | Issue | Volume | Severity | Root Cause | Status |
|------|-------|--------|----------|------------|--------|

### Trends
[Notable patterns and emerging issues]

### Recommendations
| Priority | Action | Owner | Expected Impact |
|----------|--------|-------|----------------|

Quality Checklist

  • [ ] All complaint sources are included
  • [ ] Categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive
  • [ ] Root cause analysis goes beyond symptoms
  • [ ] Trends are compared against baselines
  • [ ] Recommendations are specific and actionable
  • [ ] Severity scoring is consistent

Edge Cases

  • If complaint volume is low, extend the analysis period
  • For multilingual data, ensure translation quality before analysis
  • If categories are ambiguous, use dual-coding and measure agreement
  • For recurring complaints, track whether previous fixes were effective

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.