AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Shape

skill-astro-han-skills-shape · by Astro-Han

Interview the user to resolve material branches of a decision tree and converge on a shared plan before acting. Use when multiple reasonable choices would materially change scope, cost, reversibility, or outcome, or when the user asks to brainstorm, shape, or grill an idea. Do not use when facts can resolve the ambiguity or a reversible assumption would not materially affect the result.

No reviews yet
0 installs
4 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-astro-han-skills-shape

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Shape? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Shape

Walk down each material branch of the decision tree until you reach a shared understanding, resolving dependencies between decisions one by one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.

Ask questions one at a time, waiting for feedback before continuing. Asking multiple questions at once is bewildering.

Look up facts in the environment—filesystem, tools, or available sources—instead of asking. Decisions belong to the user: put each one to them and wait for their answer.

Use the environment's structured question tool for every user-facing question: Codex request_user_input, Claude Code AskUserQuestion, Pi/OpenCode question. Use plain text only when no such tool is available or it is rejected.

For a visual-taste decision, render minimal HTML variants side by side and let the user judge them. Do not build a visual aid for a conceptual question.

Cut scope and process until another cut would damage the goal, coherence, reversibility, or ability to improve later. Stop asking when the remaining ambiguity is reversible and would not materially change the result.

Synthesize the shortest coherent plan, including material assumptions and exclusions. Do not act on it until the user confirms you have reached a shared understanding.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.