AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Misra C Reviewer

skill-atillab1-embedded-ai-workspace-misra-c-reviewer · by atillab1

Use when reviewing embedded C code for MISRA-C:2012 (Amendment 4, 2023) compliance, or when the user asks about MISRA rules, embedded C safety, ISR safety, or wants a static-analysis-style review without commercial tools like IAR C-STAT or Axivion. Triggers on phrases like "MISRA review", "is this safe for embedded", "check this ISR", "review my firmware code".

No reviews yet
0 installs
4 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-atillab1-embedded-ai-workspace-misra-c-reviewer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README — it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-atillab1-embedded-ai-workspace-misra-c-reviewer)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming — see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps — measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Misra C Reviewer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

MISRA-C:2012 (AMD4) Reviewer

A guided code reviewer for embedded C, aimed at students and hobbyist/junior firmware developers who don't have access to commercial MISRA checkers. Catches the highest-impact rule violations and adds extra checks for ISR (Interrupt Service Routine) safety that pure MISRA does not cover.

What this skill is (and isn't)

  • Is: a structured review assistant. Loads rule summaries on demand, walks the user's code,

reports violations with rule number, severity, why-it-matters, and a fix.

  • Is not: a certified MISRA tool. The official MISRA document is the source of truth for

certification work. This skill is for learning and catching real bugs early, not for signing off safety-critical software.

Rule categories (quick reminder)

MISRA splits its guidance into:

  • Directives — high-level project-wide guidance (e.g. "all code shall be traceable to

requirements"). Stored in references/directives.md.

  • Rules — concrete code-level checks. Each rule has a category:
  • Mandatory — must always be followed. No deviation allowed.
  • Required — must be followed unless a documented deviation exists.
  • Advisory — recommended; deviation is acceptable with judgment.

Workflow

When the user asks for a MISRA review, follow this flow. Don't railroad — adapt to what they actually need.

1. Identify scope

Ask (or infer) what the user wants reviewed:

  • A pasted snippet? A file? A whole module?
  • Bare-metal / RTOS / Linux userspace? (MISRA is strictest on bare-metal & safety-critical.)
  • Is any of it inside an ISR? (If yes, ISR safety check is required — see step 4.)

If the user is a beginner, briefly explain what MISRA is in one paragraph before diving in.

2. Load the right rule reference

Progressive disclosure — only load what you need:

  • Default first pass: load references/rules-essential.md. This covers Mandatory rules

plus the highest-bug-yield Required rules (pointer conversions, type model, side effects, uninitialized vars, return-value misuse, pointer arithmetic, dynamic memory). For most student/hobbyist code this is enough.

  • If the user asks for a thorough review or the code is non-trivial: also load

references/rules-required.md.

  • If the user asks about style / maintainability or wants the strictest pass: also load

references/rules-advisory.md.

  • If the question is about project setup, toolchain, or process (not code): load

references/directives.md.

Don't load all four files at once unless the user explicitly asks for "everything". Keeping context lean produces better reviews.

3. Review the code

For each rule that applies to a line in the user's code, report a finding using this format:

[Rule X.Y — Mandatory/Required/Advisory] 
  Location: 
  Why it matters: 
  Fix: 

Group findings by severity: Mandatory first, then Required, then Advisory. Inside each group, order by line number.

If the code is clean against a rule you considered, don't list it — only report violations and strong suspicions. A noise-free report is more useful than an exhaustive one.

4. ISR safety cross-check (extra, beyond MISRA)

MISRA itself doesn't have a chapter on interrupts, but ISR bugs are the #1 source of hard-to-debug embedded failures. If any reviewed code is (or might be called from) an ISR, also check examples/isr-safety.c patterns and flag:

  • Shared variables touched from ISR + main without volatile (or without proper atomic /

critical-section protection).

  • malloc / free / printf / sprintf / floating-point / long-running loops inside an ISR.
  • Non-reentrant standard-library functions called from ISR (e.g. strtok, anything with

internal static state).

  • ISR that takes a lock that main code also takes — deadlock risk.
  • Missing memory barriers when sharing data with DMA.

Report these under a separate "ISR Safety" heading so the user can see they're additional checks, not MISRA rules.

5. Summarize

End with a short summary:

  • Counts: N Mandatory, M Required, K Advisory, J ISR-safety findings.
  • Top 3 things to fix first.
  • If the code is mostly clean, say so plainly — don't manufacture findings.

If the user wants a self-review checklist they can run themselves later, point them at checklist.md.

Examples directory

examples/ contains illustrative violation files. Read them when:

  • The user asks "show me an example of rule X".
  • You need to remind yourself of a pattern before flagging the user's code.
  • The user wants to learn MISRA, not just be reviewed — walking through an example file

is a better teaching tool than reciting rules.

Important constraints

  • Copyright: the official MISRA-C:2012 document is copyrighted. This skill paraphrases

rules in plain language and never reproduces official rule text verbatim. Rule numbers and categories (Mandatory/Required/Advisory) are factual metadata and are used freely.

  • No certification claims. Always remind the user (once, not every turn) that this is a

learning aid, not a certified tool.

  • Don't lecture. If the user pastes code, review it. Save the theory for when they ask.

Coverage status (v0.1.0)

  • rules-essential.md — populated, ~25 rules.
  • rules-required.md — skeleton only, contributions welcome.
  • rules-advisory.md — skeleton only, contributions welcome.
  • directives.md — skeleton only, contributions welcome.
  • examples/isr-safety.c — populated.
  • examples/pointer-violations.c, type-violations.c — TODO.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.