AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Debugging

skill-avinashp-agentsatlas-debugging · by AvinashP

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, error, or unexpected behavior - before proposing fixes. Requires root cause investigation first.

No reviews yet
0 installs
18 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-avinashp-agentsatlas-debugging

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access Used
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Debugging? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Systematic Debugging

Diagnose and fix errors using scientific method with disciplined root cause analysis.

The Iron Law

NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST

If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.

When to Use

Use for ANY technical issue:

  • Test failures
  • Bugs in production
  • Unexpected behavior
  • "It doesn't work" problems
  • Build/compilation failures
  • Performance problems

Use ESPECIALLY when:

  • Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting)
  • "Just one quick fix" seems obvious
  • You've already tried multiple fixes
  • Previous fix didn't work

Don't skip when:

  • Issue seems simple (simple bugs have root causes too)
  • You're in a hurry (systematic is faster than thrashing)

The Four Phases

Complete each phase before proceeding to the next.

Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation

BEFORE attempting ANY fix:

1. Read Error Messages Carefully
  • Don't skip past errors or warnings
  • They often contain the exact solution
  • Read stack traces completely
  • Note line numbers, file paths, error codes
2. Reproduce Consistently
  • Can you trigger it reliably?
  • What are the exact steps?
  • Does it happen every time?
  • If not reproducible → gather more data, don't guess
3. Check Recent Changes
  • What changed that could cause this?
  • git diff, recent commits
  • New dependencies, config changes
  • Environmental differences
4. Trace Data Flow

When error is deep in call stack:

  • Where does the bad value originate?
  • What called this with the bad value?
  • Keep tracing up until you find the source
  • Fix at source, not at symptom

See [root-cause-tracing.md](./root-cause-tracing.md) for the complete backward tracing technique.

5. Gather Evidence in Multi-Component Systems

When system has multiple components (API → service → database):

For EACH component boundary:
  - Log what data enters component
  - Log what data exits component
  - Verify environment/config propagation

Run once to gather evidence showing WHERE it breaks
THEN analyze evidence to identify failing component
THEN investigate that specific component

Phase 2: Pattern Analysis

Find the pattern before fixing:

  1. Find Working Examples - Locate similar working code in same codebase
  2. Compare Against References - Read reference implementation COMPLETELY, don't skim
  3. Identify Differences - List every difference between working and broken
  4. Understand Dependencies - What settings, config, environment does it need?

Phase 3: Hypothesis and Testing

Scientific method:

  1. Form Single Hypothesis - State clearly: "I think X is the root cause because Y"
  2. Test Minimally - Make the SMALLEST possible change to test hypothesis
  3. One Variable at a Time - Don't fix multiple things at once
  4. Verify Before Continuing
  • Did it work? → Phase 4
  • Didn't work? → Form NEW hypothesis, don't add more fixes

Phase 4: Implementation

Fix the root cause, not the symptom:

  1. Create Failing Test Case - Simplest possible reproduction, automated if possible
  2. Implement Single Fix - ONE change at a time, no "while I'm here" improvements
  3. Verify Fix - Test passes? No other tests broken? Issue actually resolved?
  4. If Fix Doesn't Work - STOP. If ≥3 fixes failed, question the architecture

Red Flags - STOP and Return to Phase 1

If you catch yourself thinking:

  • "Quick fix for now, investigate later"
  • "Just try changing X and see if it works"
  • "Add multiple changes, run tests"
  • "It's probably X, let me fix that"
  • "I don't fully understand but this might work"
  • Proposing solutions before tracing data flow
  • "One more fix attempt" (when already tried 2+)

ALL of these mean: STOP. Return to Phase 1.

Common Rationalizations

| Excuse | Reality | |--------|---------| | "Issue is simple, don't need process" | Simple issues have root causes too. Process is fast for simple bugs. | | "Emergency, no time for process" | Systematic debugging is FASTER than guess-and-check thrashing. | | "Just try this first, then investigate" | First fix sets the pattern. Do it right from the start. | | "Multiple fixes at once saves time" | Can't isolate what worked. Causes new bugs. | | "I see the problem, let me fix it" | Seeing symptoms ≠ understanding root cause. |

Quick Reference

| Phase | Key Activities | Success Criteria | |-------|---------------|------------------| | 1. Root Cause | Read errors, reproduce, check changes, trace data | Understand WHAT and WHY | | 2. Pattern | Find working examples, compare | Identify differences | | 3. Hypothesis | Form theory, test minimally | Confirmed or new hypothesis | | 4. Implementation | Create test, fix, verify | Bug resolved, tests pass |

Debugging Commands

# Git bisect for regressions
git bisect start
git bisect bad HEAD
git bisect good 

# Find recent changes to a file
git log --oneline -10 path/to/file

# Search for error message
grep -r "error message" --include="*.ts"

Common Fixes by Error Type

| Error Pattern | Likely Root Cause | Investigation | |---------------|------------------|---------------| | Cannot read property 'x' of undefined | Missing data, async timing | Trace where null originates | | Module not found | Path issues, missing export | Check exact path, case sensitivity | | CORS error | Backend config | Check Network tab, test with curl | | Timeout | Slow operation, connection issue | Profile, check network | | Works locally, fails in CI | Environment diff | Compare env vars, versions, permissions | | Intermittent failures | Race conditions, timing | Look for shared state, async issues |

Real-World Impact

From debugging sessions:

  • Systematic approach: 15-30 minutes to fix
  • Random fixes approach: 2-3 hours of thrashing
  • First-time fix rate: 95% vs 40%

See Also

  • [root-cause-tracing.md](./root-cause-tracing.md) - Trace bugs backward to original trigger
  • [strategies.md](./strategies.md) - Detailed strategies by error type
  • [examples.md](./examples.md) - Real debugging case studies

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.