Documentdb Query Optimizer

DocumentDB Query Optimizer

When This Skill Is Invoked

Invoke only when the user wants:

• Query/index optimization or performance help
• Why a query is slow or how to speed it up
• Slow queries on their cluster and/or how to optimize them
• Index recommendations or index review

Do not invoke for routine query authoring unless the user has requested help with optimization, slow queries, or indexing.

High Level Workflow

Help with a Specific Query

If the user is asking about a particular query:

1. Use list_indexes to get existing indexes on the collection
2. Use optimize_find_query (for find queries) or explain_aggregate_query

(for aggregation pipelines) to get explain output with execution stats

1. Use find_documents with limit=1 to fetch a sample document to understand the

schema

Then make an optimization suggestion based on collected information and best practices from the reference files. Prefer creating an index that fully covers the query if possible.

General Performance Help

If the user wants to examine slow queries or is looking for general performance suggestions (not regarding any particular query):

1. Use list_databases and get_db_info to understand the database structure
2. Use collection_stats to identify large collections
3. Use index_stats to check existing index usage
4. Use current_ops to see currently running operations
5. Suggest reviewing the most-used collections for missing indexes

MCP Tools Available

Database tools (for query optimization):

| Tool name (exact) | Description | | :--- | :--- | | list_indexes | List all indexes on a collection — check if the query can use an existing index | | optimize_find_query | Run explain with executionStats for a find query, returning metrics, plan shape, index stats, and collection stats in one call | | explain_aggregate_query | Run explain with executionStats for an aggregation pipeline | | explain_find_query | Run explain for a find query (lower-level than optimizefindquery) | | explain_count_query | Run explain for a count query | | find_documents | Fetch sample documents to understand schema — use with limit=1 | | collection_stats | Get collection statistics (size, document count, storage) | | index_stats | Get index usage statistics ($indexStats) | | current_ops | Get currently running database operations | | create_index | Create a new index (only after user approval) | | drop_index | Drop an existing index (only after user approval) |

Load References

Before beginning diagnosis and recommendation, load reference files.

Always load:

• references/core-indexing-principles.md

Diagnostic Workflow

Step 1: Gather Information

For a specific query, run these tools (when MCP is connected):

list_indexes({ db_name: "", collection_name: "" })

optimize_find_query({
  db_name: "",
  collection_name: "",
  query: ,
  options: { sort: , projection: , limit:  }
})

For aggregation pipelines:

explain_aggregate_query({
  db_name: "",
  collection_name: "",
  pipeline: 
})

Step 2: Analyze Explain Output

From the optimize_find_query / explain_aggregate_query response, extract:

• metrics: totalKeysExamined, totalDocsExamined, nReturned,

executionTimeMillis

• plan_shape: winning plan stage (IXSCAN vs COLLSCAN), index used
• indexes_stats: which indexes exist and their usage frequency
• collection_stats: total document count, average document size

Key ratios to evaluate:

| Metric | Good | Bad | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | keysExamined / nReturned | Close to 1 | >> 1 (poor selectivity) | | docsExamined / nReturned | Close to 1 | >> 1 (scanning too many docs) | | Plan stage | IXSCAN | COLLSCAN (no index) | | Sort stage | In-memory: false | In-memory: true (blocking sort) |

Step 3: Diagnose

Common issues and their root causes:

• COLLSCAN → No index supports the query filter. Create an index on

the filter fields.

• High keysExamined vs nReturned → Index exists but has poor selectivity.

Consider a more selective compound index.

• In-memory sort → Sort field is not indexed. Add sort field to the index

(after equality fields, before range fields).

• Large docsExamined → Index doesn't cover the query. Consider a covering

index that includes projected fields.

Step 4: Recommend

Follow the ESR Rule (Equality → Sort → Range) for compound index design:

1. Equality fields first (fields with $eq / exact match)
2. Sort fields next (fields in the sort specification)
3. Range fields last (fields with $gt, $lt, $gte, $lte, $in)

Example: Query: db.orders.find({status: 'shipped', region: 'US'}).sort({date: -1}) Recommended index: {status: 1, region: 1, date: -1} (Two equality fields, then sort field)

Step 5: Verify (Optional)

After creating the recommended index, re-run the explain to confirm improvement:

1. Create the index (with user approval)
2. Re-run optimize_find_query with the same query
3. Compare metrics before and after

Example Workflow

User: "Why is this query slow? db.orders.find({status: 'shipped', region: 'US'}).sort({date: -1})"

If MCP connection is available, run steps 1–3:

1. Check existing indexes:

• Call list_indexes with database=store, collection=orders
• Result shows: {_id: 1}, {status: 1}, {date: -1}

1. Run explain:

• Call optimize_find_query with query={status: 'shipped', region: 'US'},

options={sort: {date: -1}}

• Result: Uses {status: 1} index, then in-memory SORT,

totalKeysExamined: 50000, nReturned: 100

1. Fetch sample:

• Call find_documents with limit=1 to understand the schema

1. Diagnose: This query targets 100 docs but scans 50K index entries (poor

selectivity: 0.002). In-memory sort adds overhead. The {status: 1} index doesn't support both filter fields or sort.

1. Recommend: Create compound index {status: 1, region: 1, date: -1}

following ESR (two equality fields, then sort). This eliminates in-memory sort and improves selectivity.

Azure DocumentDB Specifics

• Index types supported: Single field, compound, text, geospatial

(2dsphere), wildcard, unique

• Default _id index: Every collection has an automatic _id index
• Compound index limit: Check current Azure documentation for maximum

number of fields in a compound index

• Index builds: Index creation on Azure DocumentDB may take time for large collections;

the operation runs in the background

• Covered queries: Azure DocumentDB supports covered queries (index-only scans) when

all queried and projected fields are in the index

• Vector search: Azure DocumentDB supports vector indexes (IVF, HNSW) for similarity

search. If IVF recall is poor, recommend switching to HNSW.

Output Format

• Keep answers short and clear: a few sentences on index and optimization

suggestions, and reasoning behind them

• Focus on highest-impact optimizations first
• Do not use strong language like "You should definitely create these indexes"

— explain they are suggestions with reasoning

• Consider how many indexes already exist — there shouldn't generally be

more than 20

• Do not create or drop indexes directly via MCP unless the user gives approval
• Present before/after metrics when possible

Safety Rules

• NEVER create or drop indexes without explicit user approval
• Always explain what the index change will do and why before asking for

approval

• If the collection has many existing indexes (>15), warn about the overhead of

adding more

• For drop recommendations, explain the impact on other queries that may use

the index

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: Azure
• Source: Azure/documentdb-agent-kit
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.