Intel Competitor Monitoring

Competitor Monitoring

Files-only workflow for monitoring external companies/competitors in a shared repo. The source of truth is committed Markdown under workspace/.

There is no hidden runtime state. This makes the workflow easier to review, merge, and hand to another agent or teammate.

Read Firm Context First

Before adding or crawling competitors:

1. Read workspace/firm/profile.md for firm scope, services, geography, and

known competitors.

1. Read existing competitor folders under

workspace/intelligence/competitors/{slug}/.

1. Write findings and weekly exports to workspace/intelligence/reports/.

When to Use

• User asks for competitor monitoring, account tracking, or website change

detection.

• A competitor profile exists and pages should be crawled or refreshed.
• Discovery produced candidate competitors and the user confirmed which ones to

monitor.

• Weekly report needs change artifacts to summarize.

Core Rules

1. One competitor = one folder:

workspace/intelligence/competitors/{slug}/.

1. Homepage is monitored by default when a competitor is added.
2. Discovered subpages default to monitor: false; the user must approve them

before recurring crawls.

1. First crawl stores a baseline snapshot only. It must not create a business

change alert.

1. Every later crawl compares against the latest previous snapshot for the same

page slug.

1. Significant changes are written as Markdown change artifacts; minor/noisy

changes may be omitted or marked significance: minor.

1. Never invent changes. If scraping fails or content is incomplete, write a

crawl note with status: error instead of summarizing guessed differences.

File Layout

Use the structure documented in references/file-layout.md:

workspace/intelligence/competitors/{slug}/
├── !_profile.md
├── pages.md
├── notes.md
├── snapshots/
│   └── {page-slug}/
│       └── {YYYY-MM-DDTHHMMSSZ}.md
└── changes/
    └── {YYYY-MM-DDTHHMMSSZ}--{page-slug}.md

Weekly reports stay outside competitor folders:

workspace/intelligence/reports/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{slug}-weekly.md

Workflow

1. Ensure competitor profile

Create or update:

workspace/intelligence/competitors/{slug}/!_profile.md

Required frontmatter:

---
name: Example Competitor
website_url: https://www.example.com/
root_domain: example.com
company_type: competitor
monitoring_enabled: true
monitoring_frequency: weekly
source: manual
created: 2026-06-06
updated: 2026-06-06
---

If the competitor came from discovery, include the discovery phrase and reason in the body. Do not mirror this into hidden JSON.

2. Ensure page index

Create or update:

workspace/intelligence/competitors/{slug}/pages.md

Use a table:

# Monitored Pages

| Page slug | URL | Monitor | Priority | Source | Last crawled | Notes |
|-----------|-----|---------|----------|--------|--------------|-------|
| homepage | https://www.example.com/ | true | high | manual |  | Baseline page |

Rules:

• Page slug must be stable kebab-case.
• Homepage row is required and starts with Monitor=true.
• Discovered pages are appended with Monitor=false.
• Do not delete old page rows automatically; mark in notes if removed or broken.

3. Discover pages

Use sitemap, current agent/browser, or tool-firecrawl if configured.

Write discovered candidates by appending rows to pages.md with Monitor=false. Keep the list short and useful:

• service pages,
• pricing/offer pages,
• case studies,
• resources/blog pages that reveal positioning,
• team/about pages if hiring or leadership changes matter.

Avoid adding every blog post. For most firms, 5-20 monitored candidates is enough.

4. Crawl enabled pages

For each row with Monitor=true:

1. Fetch clean page content.
2. Normalize obvious noise: whitespace, tracking parameters, cookie banners,

repeated nav/footer text when possible.

1. Compute a content hash if the agent/tool can do so. If not, use the snapshot

timestamp and content body as evidence.

1. Write a snapshot:

snapshots/{page-slug}/{YYYY-MM-DDTHHMMSSZ}.md

Snapshot frontmatter:

---
page_slug: homepage
url: https://www.example.com/
crawled_at: 2026-06-06T12:00:00Z
status: success
content_hash: optional-hash
word_count: 1234
source_tool: current-agent
---

Body: cleaned Markdown page content, truncated only if the page is too large. If truncated, say exactly where.

5. Compare with previous snapshot

Find the latest older snapshot for the same page slug.

• If none exists: baseline only, no change artifact.
• If the new content is equivalent after normalization: no change artifact.
• If changed: write a change artifact:

changes/{YYYY-MM-DDTHHMMSSZ}--{page-slug}.md

Change artifact frontmatter:

---
page_slug: homepage
url: https://www.example.com/
previous_snapshot: snapshots/homepage/2026-06-01T120000Z.md
current_snapshot: snapshots/homepage/2026-06-06T120000Z.md
changed_at: 2026-06-06T12:00:00Z
change_type: messaging
significance: significant
---

Body sections:

1. ## Business Summary - 2-3 sentences.
2. ## What Changed - concrete observed changes.
3. ## Why It Matters - implications for the firm.
4. ## Evidence - short excerpts or bullet references to the snapshots.

Significance Rules

Mark significance: minor for:

• typo/formatting/copyright-year changes,
• cookie/banner/nav/footer noise,
• minor date updates,
• tracking or script changes,
• tiny wording changes with no commercial implication.

Mark significance: significant for:

• new service, offer, package, or pricing signal,
• changed positioning or ICP language,
• new case study/client proof,
• hiring/leadership/partnership change,
• page removal or major information removal,
• new campaign, event, resource, or productized service relevant to the firm.

If uncertain, mark significance: review and explain what a human should check.

Scheduling

This skill does not require a built-in scheduler. For a shared repo, prefer one responsible person or automation runner to perform recurring crawls and commit the resulting files.

Recommended cadence:

| Page priority | Cadence | |---------------|---------| | high | weekly | | normal | monthly | | low | quarterly or manual |

Avoid multiple people crawling the same competitor at the same time. Timestamped snapshot files reduce merge conflicts, but duplicate snapshots create noisy history.

Testing Requirements

1. Create one competitor folder with !_profile.md and pages.md.
2. Crawl homepage once and write a baseline snapshot.
3. Crawl the same page again and confirm either no change artifact or one

changes/{timestamp}--homepage.md.

1. Run intel-weekly-report against the change artifacts.

Reference Files

| File | Content | |------|---------| | references/file-layout.md | Folder structure and artifact rules |

Related Skills

| Skill | When | |-------|------| | firm-context | Before setup - competitor list and firm scope | | intel-competitor-discovery | SERP-based competitor finding | | intel-weekly-report | Weekly report generation from change files |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: b2bforce
• Source: b2bforce/b2bforce
• License: MIT
• Homepage: https://www.b2bforce.ai/

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.