Install
$ agentstack add skill-bahayonghang-my-ai-cli-toolkit-paper-workbench ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Paper Workbench
Unified entrypoint for paper intake, strategic reading, multi-paper synthesis, and review construction.
Keep paper-record as the normalization layer. Do not merge high-level analysis back into the normalized record.
> In the python commands below, `` is this skill's base directory, > announced when the skill loads. Substitute that literal path; it is not an > environment variable. Bundled scripts self-locate, so only the path needs to > resolve.
When to use
Use this skill when the job is to:
- read one paper quickly
- deeply deconstruct one paper
- compare or synthesize multiple papers
- build a review outline or gap map
- normalize paper sources into reusable machine-readable artifacts
Do not use this skill when the primary job is to implement a paper from its methods into working code. That implementation work is out of scope for this skill.
Public interfaces
paper-record— normalized single-paper factsresearcher-profile— user research anchorpaper-deep-read— single-paper strategic analysis artifactliterature-synthesis— cross-paper integration artifactreview-outline— literature-review planning artifact
Accepted inputs
- arXiv IDs and arXiv URLs
- AlphaXiv URLs
- DOI strings or
doi.org/...URLs - local academic PDFs or text files
- remote PDF URLs
- paper landing pages that expose a PDF
- existing
paper-recordJSON - existing
researcher-profile,paper-deep-read,literature-synthesis, or
review-outline JSON
Routing workflow
- Resolve the input class from
$ARGUMENTS, the latest user message, or a
pasted JSON artifact.
- If the request is paper-level and not already normalized, run
scripts/normalize_paper.py first.
- Determine the mode from explicit user intent or the defaulting rules below.
- If the chosen mode is profile-sensitive, load the supplied
researcher-profile or collect only the missing fields.
- Produce the requested mode output.
- Persist artifacts only when the user asked to save them.
Mode quick guide
Single-paper modes
scan- Use for “先快速扫一下”, “预判”, or fast worth-reading decisions
deep-read- Use for “精读这篇”, “深度阅读”, “解构这篇”
card- Use for “只做卡片”
interpret- Compatibility path for a lightweight explanation
xray- Compatibility path for compact critique
json- Return the normalized
paper-record
Cross-paper modes
synthesis- Use for “整合这几篇”, “对比分析”, “找研究空白”
review- Use for “搭综述框架”, “写这一段”
Defaulting rules
- If the user explicitly asks for a machine-readable or saved schema artifact,
default to json
- If the user provides a single paper and asks to read or analyze it without a
more specific mode, default to scan
- If the user provides 3 or more papers and asks for integration, default to
synthesis
- If the user provides exactly 2 papers and asks for integration, run a
comparison-oriented synthesis and mark any gap mapping as provisional
Normalize first
For any paper-like input, run:
python "/scripts/normalize_paper.py" \
--source "" \
--lang "" \
--fulltext ""
Use --save only when the user asked to persist the normalized JSON.
Profile workflow
Before deep-read, card, synthesis, or review, prefer a researcher-profile.
If missing, collect only these fields:
research_fieldcore_questionthesis(optional)target_tierstage
If the user clearly wants no back-and-forth, proceed with a generic profile-light analysis and explicitly mark that personalization is limited.
If the user wants persistence, create or update the profile with:
python "/scripts/workbench_io.py" init-profile \
--path "" \
--research-field "" \
--core-question "" \
--thesis "" \
--target-tier "" \
--stage ""
Artifact persistence
When the user asks to save a deep read, synthesis, or review plan, write a JSON artifact plus an optional Markdown or Org sidecar:
python "/scripts/workbench_io.py" save-artifact \
--workspace "" \
--artifact-type "" \
--title "" \
--payload-file "" \
--profile-path "" \
--source-record "" \
--sidecar-file ""
Output rules
- Separate
作者观点from系统分析 - Never invent page numbers, quotations, or empirical details
- If a requested quote or page anchor is missing, use
[信息待核实] synthesisandreviewmust integrate arguments across papers rather than
serially summarizing each paper
reviewparagraphs must use PEEL as a micro-argument structure, not a
citation list
- If the input evidence is too thin for the requested mode, downgrade the claim
strength instead of pretending full coverage
Edge cases
- Mixed raw sources + existing JSON artifacts:
- normalize raw sources first, then merge at the artifact layer
- More than one paper but user asks for
deep-read: - either choose the clearly primary paper or ask which one to focus on
- DOI metadata only and no reachable full text:
- return the strongest metadata available and mark missing full-text facts
References
references/routing.md— source classification and routing logicreferences/schema.md— canonicalpaper-recordcontractreferences/artifacts.md—researcher-profileand higher-level artifactsreferences/migration.md— compatibility and alias mappingreferences/ANALYSIS_FRAMEWORK.md— x-ray five-dimension critique frameworkreferences/template-paper.org— Org sidecar template for deep-read / interpret outputreferences/template-xray.org— Org sidecar template for x-ray critique outputreferences/modes/json.md— machine-readable output rulesreferences/modes/interpret.md— lightweight explanation pathreferences/modes/xray.md— compact critique pathreferences/modes/scan.md— single-paper quick triagereferences/modes/deep-read.md— full single-paper deconstructionreferences/modes/card.md— literature card onlyreferences/modes/synthesis.md— cross-paper integrationreferences/modes/review.md— literature-review planning and writing
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: bahayonghang
- Source: bahayonghang/my-ai-cli-toolkit
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.