Install
$ agentstack add skill-bambam955-skills-implement-github-issue ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Implement GitHub Issue
Turn a GitHub issue into a reviewed pull request. Start from the issue, build only the context needed to implement it, validate the change, review your own diff critically, and open the PR only when the branch is in a defensible state.
Invocation
- Treat a bare number after the skill name as the GitHub issue number in the current repository.
- Example:
$implement-github-issue 56means to implement issue56.
Workflow
1. Read the issue
- Fetch the issue title, description, comments, labels, and linked references with
gh issue view. - Extract acceptance criteria, constraints, rollout notes, and ambiguity that could change implementation.
- If the issue is thin, inspect linked code, pull requests, or nearby docs before asking the user.
2. Build context
- Check the working tree first with
git status --short; do not overwrite unrelated local changes. - Use
rgto find the relevant code paths, tests, feature flags, config, and recent history. - Read the smallest set of files that explains the current behavior and the expected change.
- Ask the user only when a product decision or acceptance criterion cannot be inferred from the issue or code.
3. Prepare the branch
- Stay on the current branch if it is already the intended feature branch.
- Otherwise create a branch named
-. - Keep the branch scoped to the issue. Avoid opportunistic cleanup unless it is required for the fix.
4. Implement
- Make the code changes directly unless the user explicitly asked for design or planning first.
- Match the repository's conventions for architecture, naming, formatting, tests, and commit messages.
- Add or update tests when behavior changes. If test coverage is not practical, record why.
- Work carefully in dirty trees and preserve existing user changes.
5. Validate
- Run the narrowest useful checks first, then broaden only as needed.
- Prefer repository-native test, lint, and build commands.
- Fix failures, flaky assumptions, and generated diffs before moving on.
- If a required validation step cannot run, capture the exact reason and resulting risk.
6. Review your own diff
- Read the diff as a reviewer, not the author.
- Check for correctness, regressions, missing tests, edge cases, naming problems, and accidental scope growth.
- Tighten the code, tests, or docs before opening the PR.
- Confirm
git statusis clean except for intentional changes.
7. Commit, push, and open the PR
- Create logical commits with Conventional Commit messages.
- Push the branch and create the pull request with
gh pr create. - Write a PR title and description that reference the issue and always include:
## Summary ## Testing
- The testing steps should be in checklist form so that reviewers can make clear to an author what worked and didn't work for them.
- Create a draft PR instead of a ready PR when validation is incomplete or open questions remain.
Operating Rules
- Prefer
ghfor issue and pull request operations. - Prefer
rgfor repository search and gather only the context needed for the task. - Always use Conventional Commit messages for commits created during this workflow.
- Never overwrite unrelated local changes or revert work you did not make.
- Never open a ready PR with known failing validation unless the user explicitly wants a draft for early feedback.
- Surface blockers early when credentials, permissions, CI failures, or missing product decisions prevent completion.
Pull Request Checklist
- The implementation matches the issue's acceptance criteria.
- The diff is scoped, readable, and limited to intentional changes.
- Validation covers the changed behavior well enough for the repository.
- The branch name follows
-. - Every commit uses Conventional Commits.
- The branch is pushed and the PR description includes
## Summaryand## Testing.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: bambam955
- Source: bambam955/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.