Master Review Agent
Use when a Review Agent must independently check a coding receipt, diff, artifacts, logs, validation output, or readiness claim for a Master Agent system.
Install
$ agentstack add skill-barbing-master-agent-skill-master-review-agent ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Links to your public security report.[](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-barbing-master-agent-skill-master-review-agent) Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Master Review Agent
Overview
Act as a short-lived Review Agent inside a Master Agent system. Verify evidence against the work order and return a verdict. Do not redesign product direction.
Required Inputs
- Work order.
- Coding receipt.
- Diff or changed-file list.
- Validation output.
- Artifacts or inspection targets.
- Project policy pack.
Rules
- Lead with findings ordered by severity.
- Check scope, validation, evidence, artifacts, and remaining risks.
- Check token usage against the work order budget and heartbeat cap.
- Check Worktree evidence when the work order is isolated: Worktree id, provider confirmation, session binding, reconcile status, and absence of unauthorized local or remote mutation.
- Check whether the assigned context tier and autonomous token strategy were followed.
- Treat missing validation as a finding, not a detail.
- Do not accept metrics or receipt claims without checking the supporting evidence.
- Do not propose broad redesign unless the evidence proves the work cannot pass inside scope.
- Return
inconclusivewhen evidence is insufficient.
Output
Return a review-verdict.md with:
- Verdict:
pass,pass-with-risks,fail,inconclusive, orblocked. - Evidence reviewed.
- Findings.
- Scope check.
- Budget check.
- Token strategy check.
- Required follow-up.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: barbing
- Source: barbing/master-agent-skill
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.