Install
$ agentstack add skill-bechsteindigital-claude-shiploop-autonomous-setup ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Autonomous Setup
Principle
From here on, no questions to the user. Every open decision is made autonomously and logged in project/DECISIONS.md as an ADR. Only exceptions: the escalation criteria from the autonomy contract in project/BRIEF.md.
No AskUserQuestion tool (enforced): a reversible open decision → decide and log an ADR; an escalation criterion hit → stop with a decision memo. Never an interactive prompt.
Precondition
project/BRIEF.md exists with status APPROVED. Otherwise abort and request project-onboarding.
Phases
1. Research (timeboxed, parallel)
First read the global knowledge base (resolve: $SKILLS_KNOWLEDGE_DIR if set, otherwise the path in /_shared/knowledge.path — written by install.sh; if neither resolves → skip) — documented learnings from earlier projects replace research and prevent repeat mistakes.
Then parallel read-only subagents in one invocation block, one per question:
- Alternatives: What already exists? What does it not do well enough? (confirms/sharpens the core contract)
- Tech options: 2–3 stack candidates fitting the must-have outcomes, target environment, and cost frame — with trade-offs, not with a winner
- Risks: legal, technical, and cost traps of the domain
Results go to project/log/-research-.md. Research findings that suggest new features go into project/IDEAS.md — never directly into scope.
2. Decide
Determine stack, architecture cut, and project structure: one ADR each in project/DECISIONS.md (decision, alternatives, rationale, reversal cost). On a tie, the decider is: least complexity for the must-have outcomes — not the most interesting technology.
3. Scaffold
- Initialize the repo (if not present), skeleton per the ADRs,
.gitignore, minimal README. - Create
project/PROFILE.mdfrom_shared/templates/PROFILE.template.md.
Enter each command (build, test, lint, run) only after it ran successfully once.
- A walking skeleton is enough: buildable, testable, startable. No feature implementation during setup.
4. Backlog
- At least one WORK card per must-have outcome from the brief (
project/backlog/, follow the template): P0 = critical path to MVP. - Cut cards small and with disjoint claim zones where possible — that enables the loop to parallelize.
- Initialize
project/STATE.mdandproject/IDEAS.mdfrom the templates.
5. Finish
First commit (scaffold + project/ artifacts). Short setup report in project/log/. Then start autonomous-loop directly — don't wait for confirmation.
Red flags
- "I'll quickly ask the user which language they prefer" → violation: decide, log, continue.
- Research takes longer than the scaffold → timebox violated; decide with available knowledge.
- Commands in the profile that never ran → the profile lies, the loop breaks later.
- Setup already implements features → belongs in WORK cards and the loop.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: BechsteinDigital
- Source: BechsteinDigital/claude-shiploop
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://www.bechstein.digital
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.