AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Huashu Video Check

skill-biraj2004-huashu-skills-english-huashu-video-check-en · by Biraj2004

Check video titles, thumbnails, and opening hooks based on MrBeast's strategies. Use when the user mentions "video title", "thumbnail", "click-through rate", "CTR", or "watch time".

No reviews yet
0 installs
9 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-biraj2004-huashu-skills-english-huashu-video-check-en

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Huashu Video Check? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Video Thumbnail, Title & Hook Review

A professional review capability for video titles, thumbnails, and content engagement — based on the MrBeast methodology — to improve click-through rate and watch time.

When to Use This Skill

This skill is automatically loaded when:

  • The user says "check the title and thumbnail" or "check content engagement"
  • After a video script draft is completed
  • The user mentions "low click-through rate" or "short watch time"
  • Need to optimise video titles or thumbnails

Core Objectives

  • Improve click-through rate: Titles and thumbnails attract users to click
  • Improve watch time: Strong content engagement keeps viewers watching to the end
  • Build reusable formulas: Standardised thumbnail, title, and engagement strategies

Review Dimensions

1️⃣ Title Review (Strong Contrast Strategy)

2️⃣ Thumbnail Review (Results-First Strategy)

3️⃣ Content Engagement Review (Opening confirmation → Mid-section surprise → Closing payoff)


1️⃣ Title Review: Strong Contrast Strategy

Core Principle

Focus on the strongest single contrast — don't list everything

5 Strong Contrast Formulas

Formula 1: Quantity Contrast

Format: Small quantity vs Large quantity

Examples:

  • ✅ "1 Prompt Wrote 1,000 Lines of Code"
  • ✅ "3 People vs a Team of 300 — Who Wins?"
  • ✅ "1 Tool That Replaces 10 Tools"

Best for: Tutorial content, efficiency content, tool reviews


Formula 2: Price Contrast

Format: Low price vs High price or Free vs Paid

Examples:

  • ✅ "£15 vs £150 AI — How Big Is the Gap?"
  • ✅ "What Can Free AI Do? I Tested 10 Tools"
  • ✅ "Same Features — Is Claude Worth 10x More Than GPT?"

Best for: Reviews, comparisons


Formula 3: Results Contrast

Format: Low results vs High results or Before vs After

Examples:

  • ✅ "300K Followers vs 0 — I Only Did One Thing Right"
  • ✅ "From 0 to 1,000 Views — I Used 3 Techniques"
  • ✅ "Same Video, Different Title — Views Increased 10x"

Best for: Experience sharing, growth stories


Formula 4: Strength Contrast

Format: Beginner / Underdog vs Expert / Powerhouse

Examples:

  • ✅ "Beginner vs Cursor: Who Writes This Feature Faster?"
  • ✅ "I Pitted AI Against a Programmer — The Results Were Shocking"
  • ✅ "Complete Novice Attempts to Build an App with AI"

Best for: Challenge content, experiment content


Formula 5: Time Contrast

Format: Short time vs Long time or Fast vs Slow

Examples:

  • ✅ "3 Minutes vs 3 Hours: Is AI Coding Actually Faster?"
  • ✅ "I Finished in 1 Day What Took Others a Week"
  • ✅ "From Learning to Proficiency — Cursor Takes Just 10 Minutes"

Best for: Tutorial content, efficiency content


Title Type Selection Guide

| Content Type | Recommended Title Type | Example |

param($m) $inner = $m.Groups[1].Value # Split by | and fix each cell separator $cells = $inner -split '\|' $fixedCells = $cells | ForEach-Object { $cell = --- name: huashu-video-check description: Check video titles, thumbnails, and opening hooks based on MrBeast's strategies. Use when the user mentions "video title", "thumbnail", "click-through rate", "CTR", or "watch time". ---

Video Thumbnail, Title & Hook Review

A professional review capability for video titles, thumbnails, and content engagement — based on the MrBeast methodology — to improve click-through rate and watch time.

When to Use This Skill

This skill is automatically loaded when:

  • The user says "check the title and thumbnail" or "check content engagement"
  • After a video script draft is completed
  • The user mentions "low click-through rate" or "short watch time"
  • Need to optimise video titles or thumbnails

Core Objectives

  • Improve click-through rate: Titles and thumbnails attract users to click
  • Improve watch time: Strong content engagement keeps viewers watching to the end
  • Build reusable formulas: Standardised thumbnail, title, and engagement strategies

Review Dimensions

1️⃣ Title Review (Strong Contrast Strategy)

2️⃣ Thumbnail Review (Results-First Strategy)

3️⃣ Content Engagement Review (Opening confirmation → Mid-section surprise → Closing payoff)


1️⃣ Title Review: Strong Contrast Strategy

Core Principle

Focus on the strongest single contrast — don't list everything

5 Strong Contrast Formulas

Formula 1: Quantity Contrast

Format: Small quantity vs Large quantity

Examples:

  • ✅ "1 Prompt Wrote 1,000 Lines of Code"
  • ✅ "3 People vs a Team of 300 — Who Wins?"
  • ✅ "1 Tool That Replaces 10 Tools"

Best for: Tutorial content, efficiency content, tool reviews


Formula 2: Price Contrast

Format: Low price vs High price or Free vs Paid

Examples:

  • ✅ "£15 vs £150 AI — How Big Is the Gap?"
  • ✅ "What Can Free AI Do? I Tested 10 Tools"
  • ✅ "Same Features — Is Claude Worth 10x More Than GPT?"

Best for: Reviews, comparisons


Formula 3: Results Contrast

Format: Low results vs High results or Before vs After

Examples:

  • ✅ "300K Followers vs 0 — I Only Did One Thing Right"
  • ✅ "From 0 to 1,000 Views — I Used 3 Techniques"
  • ✅ "Same Video, Different Title — Views Increased 10x"

Best for: Experience sharing, growth stories


Formula 4: Strength Contrast

Format: Beginner / Underdog vs Expert / Powerhouse

Examples:

  • ✅ "Beginner vs Cursor: Who Writes This Feature Faster?"
  • ✅ "I Pitted AI Against a Programmer — The Results Were Shocking"
  • ✅ "Complete Novice Attempts to Build an App with AI"

Best for: Challenge content, experiment content


Formula 5: Time Contrast

Format: Short time vs Long time or Fast vs Slow

Examples:

  • ✅ "3 Minutes vs 3 Hours: Is AI Coding Actually Faster?"
  • ✅ "I Finished in 1 Day What Took Others a Week"
  • ✅ "From Learning to Proficiency — Cursor Takes Just 10 Minutes"

Best for: Tutorial content, efficiency content


Title Type Selection Guide

| Content Type | Recommended Title Type | Example | |-------------|----------------------|---------| | Tutorial | Results contrast, time contrast | "One Cursor Feature That Doubled My Efficiency" | | Review | Price/performance contrast | "Free AI vs Paid AI — How Big Is the Gap?" | | Challenge | Strength/quantity contrast | "Beginner Challenges Themselves to Build an App with AI" | | Experience sharing | Results contrast | "Same Video, Different Title — Views Increased 10x" |


Title Types to Avoid

Listicle-style: "5 Common Features of Cursor"

  • Problem: No conflict, no suspense
  • Fix: Focus on the 1 strongest feature → "One Cursor Feature That Doubled My Efficiency"

Bland: "Cursor Tutorial"

  • Problem: No attraction, no specific value
  • Fix: Add results contrast → "Get Started with Cursor in 3 Minutes — 5x Faster Workflow"

Abstract: "The Future Trends of AI Coding"

  • Problem: Too abstract, hard to picture
  • Fix: Make it specific → "3 Months of AI-Assisted Coding — Here's What I Found"

Title Checklist

When reviewing a title, confirm:

  • [ ] Does the title have a clear contrast or conflict? (quantity, price, results, strength, or time)
  • [ ] Is the title focused on 1 core point? (not listing multiple things)
  • [ ] Can the title make the viewer picture a scene or scenario?
  • [ ] Does the title create suspense? (makes you want to know the outcome)
  • [ ] Is the title the right length? (15–25 words; no more than 30)
  • [ ] Is the title honest? (can be delivered on in the video)

2️⃣ Thumbnail Review: Results Display Strategy

Core Principle

Choose the thumbnail strategy based on subscriber count and content type

Face Thumbnails (Use with Caution)

✅ Suitable for:

  • Subscriber count > 100K (face has brand value)
  • Content types: Challenge content, Vlog, high-emotion content
  • Extreme and consistent expression (surprise / excitement / shock)
  • An established, fixed thumbnail style

❌ Not suitable for:

  • Subscriber count By Huashu | AI Native Coder · Independent Developer

> WeChat Official Account "Huashu" | 300k+ followers | AI Tools & Productivity > Flagship products: Kitty Catchlight (AppStore Paid Rankings Top 1) · Play DeepSeek with One Book .Trim() if ($cell -match '^:?-+:? | Tutorial | Results contrast, time contrast | "One Cursor Feature That Doubled My Efficiency" | | Review | Price/performance contrast | "Free AI vs Paid AI — How Big Is the Gap?" | | Challenge | Strength/quantity contrast | "Beginner Challenges Themselves to Build an App with AI" | | Experience sharing | Results contrast | "Same Video, Different Title — Views Increased 10x" |


Title Types to Avoid

Listicle-style: "5 Common Features of Cursor"

  • Problem: No conflict, no suspense
  • Fix: Focus on the 1 strongest feature → "One Cursor Feature That Doubled My Efficiency"

Bland: "Cursor Tutorial"

  • Problem: No attraction, no specific value
  • Fix: Add results contrast → "Get Started with Cursor in 3 Minutes — 5x Faster Workflow"

Abstract: "The Future Trends of AI Coding"

  • Problem: Too abstract, hard to picture
  • Fix: Make it specific → "3 Months of AI-Assisted Coding — Here's What I Found"

Title Checklist

When reviewing a title, confirm:

  • [ ] Does the title have a clear contrast or conflict? (quantity, price, results, strength, or time)
  • [ ] Is the title focused on 1 core point? (not listing multiple things)
  • [ ] Can the title make the viewer picture a scene or scenario?
  • [ ] Does the title create suspense? (makes you want to know the outcome)
  • [ ] Is the title the right length? (15–25 words; no more than 30)
  • [ ] Is the title honest? (can be delivered on in the video)

2️⃣ Thumbnail Review: Results Display Strategy

Core Principle

Choose the thumbnail strategy based on subscriber count and content type

Face Thumbnails (Use with Caution)

✅ Suitable for:

  • Subscriber count > 100K (face has brand value)
  • Content types: Challenge content, Vlog, high-emotion content
  • Extreme and consistent expression (surprise / excitement / shock)
  • An established, fixed thumbnail style

❌ Not suitable for:

  • Subscriber count By Huashu | AI Native Coder · Independent Developer

> WeChat Official Account "Huashu" | 300k+ followers | AI Tools & Productivity > Flagship products: Kitty Catchlight (AppStore Paid Rankings Top 1) · Play DeepSeek with One Book ) { " $cell " } else { " $cell " } } '|' + ($fixedCells -join '|') + '|'

| Tutorial | Results contrast, time contrast | "One Cursor Feature That Doubled My Efficiency" | | Review | Price/performance contrast | "Free AI vs Paid AI — How Big Is the Gap?" | | Challenge | Strength/quantity contrast | "Beginner Challenges Themselves to Build an App with AI" | | Experience sharing | Results contrast | "Same Video, Different Title — Views Increased 10x" |


Title Types to Avoid

Listicle-style: "5 Common Features of Cursor"

  • Problem: No conflict, no suspense
  • Fix: Focus on the 1 strongest feature → "One Cursor Feature That Doubled My Efficiency"

Bland: "Cursor Tutorial"

  • Problem: No attraction, no specific value
  • Fix: Add results contrast → "Get Started with Cursor in 3 Minutes — 5x Faster Workflow"

Abstract: "The Future Trends of AI Coding"

  • Problem: Too abstract, hard to picture
  • Fix: Make it specific → "3 Months of AI-Assisted Coding — Here's What I Found"

Title Checklist

When reviewing a title, confirm:

  • [ ] Does the title have a clear contrast or conflict? (quantity, price, results, strength, or time)
  • [ ] Is the title focused on 1 core point? (not listing multiple things)
  • [ ] Can the title make the viewer picture a scene or scenario?
  • [ ] Does the title create suspense? (makes you want to know the outcome)
  • [ ] Is the title the right length? (15–25 words; no more than 30)
  • [ ] Is the title honest? (can be delivered on in the video)

2️⃣ Thumbnail Review: Results Display Strategy

Core Principle

Choose the thumbnail strategy based on subscriber count and content type

Face Thumbnails (Use with Caution)

✅ Suitable for:

  • Subscriber count > 100K (face has brand value)
  • Content types: Challenge content, Vlog, high-emotion content
  • Extreme and consistent expression (surprise / excitement / shock)
  • An established, fixed thumbnail style

❌ Not suitable for:

  • Subscriber count 100K (face has brand value)
  • Content types: Challenge content, Vlog, high-emotion content
  • Extreme and consistent expression (surprise / excitement / shock)
  • An established, fixed thumbnail style

❌ Not suitable for:

  • Subscriber count By Huashu | AI Native Coder · Independent Developer

> WeChat Official Account "Huashu" | 300k+ followers | AI Tools & Productivity > Flagship products: Kitty Catchlight (AppStore Paid Rankings Top 1) · Play DeepSeek with One Book .Trim() if ($cell -match '^:?-+:? | Tutorial | Before/After comparison | Original code on left, optimised on right | | Review | Product close-up + data | Product UI + performance numbers | | Challenge | Extreme scene + emotion | Optional face (if it tests well) | | Experience sharing | Data comparison | View count growth chart |


Thumbnail Designs to Avoid

Text-only thumbnails: Too much information; no visual impact ❌ Too many elements: Visually chaotic; no clear focus ❌ Different style every video: Can't build viewer recognition


A/B Testing Recommendation

  • Prepare 2 thumbnails for the same video
  • A: Face thumbnail (if you want to test this)
  • B: Results-display thumbnail
  • Track click-through rate data; keep the better-performing one

Thumbnail Checklist

When reviewing a thumbnail, confirm:

  • [ ] Does the thumbnail type suit the content and subscriber count? (results display first)
  • [ ] Does the thumbnail have strong contrast? (colour, size, numbers)
  • [ ] Does the thumbnail have a clear visual focus? (1–2 core elements)
  • [ ] Is the text on the thumbnail minimal? (0–5 words)
  • [ ] Is the thumbnail style consistent? (colour scheme, layout, font)
  • [ ] Does the thumbnail complement the title? (dual attraction: visual + text)

3️⃣ Content Engagement Review: Suspense Delay Strategy

Core Principle

Build suspense in the opening, exceed expectations in the middle, deliver on the promise at the close

Standard Engagement Structure

Title / Thumbnail: Core suspense (strongest contrast or conflict)
    ↓
Opening (first 30 seconds – 1 minute):
- Confirm the title promise exists (build trust)
- Create suspense: "Can it actually be done?"
- Preview what's coming: "But before that, first..."
    ↓
Middle section (main content):
- Core teaching / demonstration
- Add an "unexpected surprise" (exceeds expectations)
- Keep reminding of the suspense: "Almost there, nearly time..."
    ↓
Closing (final 1–3 minutes):
- Deliver on the title promise (show the core content)
- Summarise key points
- Call to Action (subscribe / like / comment)

Duration Control Guide

| Total Video Length | Opening Confirmation | Middle Content | Closing Payoff | |-------------------|---------------------|----------------|----------------| | 3–5 minutes | 30 seconds | 2–3 minutes | 1 minute | | 5–10 minutes | 1 minute | 6–7 minutes | 2 minutes | | 10–15 minutes | 1–2 minutes | 8–10 minutes | 3 minutes |


Engagement Review Example

Example: Tutorial Video

Title: One Cursor Feature That Doubled My Efficiency

✅ Correct engagement:

Opening (30 seconds):

"There's a Cursor feature that saves me 3 hours on every project.
What feature? I'll demo it shortly.
But first, let me quickly run through the basics of Cursor,
so you can understand why this feature is so powerful."

← Confirms the promise exists, builds suspense

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.