Install
$ agentstack add skill-biyachuev-claude-debate-skills-options-challenge ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Options Challenge
Use this skill for decisions where at least two plausible paths exist and the user wants ranking, trade-offs, and a final recommendation.
Treat $ARGUMENTS as the full decision brief.
Non-negotiable rules
- If Codex is not available in the current Claude Code session, say that explicitly and stop. Do not fabricate Codex output.
- Show the option framing, challenge, and ranking visibly in the chat.
- Unless the user opted out of logging, save the full visible output to a resolved log path.
- If logging is enabled, show the exact log path at the start and confirm save success or failure at the end.
Log file resolution
Accept either Log File: or Save As: in the user brief.
Resolve the log path with these rules:
- If the user passes
No Log,Log: none, orLog File: none, skip all file writing. Do not resolve a path, do not create directories, do not save anything. - A bare filename such as
go-to-market-optionsbecomes.claude/debate-logs/go-to-market-options.md. - A filename with
.mdstays as given under.claude/debate-logs/. - A relative path with folders such as
notes/decisions/go-to-market-options.mdis used relative to the project root. - If omitted, default to
.claude/debate-logs/${CLAUDE_SESSION_ID}-options-challenge.md. - Create parent directories if needed.
Protocol
- Extract or infer:
- decision brief
- goal
- constraints
- selected finalizer
- resolved log path (skip if logging is disabled)
- Claude frames
2-4 distinct options. - Codex challenges each option:
- strongest upside
- major downside
- execution risk
- what must be true for it to work
- Claude revises the framing and produces a preliminary ranking.
- Codex pressure-tests the top-ranked option and the runner-up.
- The finalizer produces:
- final ranking
- recommendation
- why not the alternatives
Required chat format
Log Path(omit if logging is disabled)Decision BriefOption SetCodex ChallengeTop Options Stress TestRevised RankingFinal RecommendationWhy Not The AlternativesKey Assumptions
Logging requirements
If the user opted out of logging, skip this entire section — do not write any files and do not print log status lines.
Write the same visible output to the resolved log path.
If the file already exists, append a new entry unless the user explicitly asks to replace it.
Each saved entry must contain:
- date or session context if available
- raw user brief
- selected finalizer
- resolved log path
- every visible section from the answer
After saving, end with:
Log saved: or Log failed: .
Quality bar
- Options must be materially different, not cosmetic variants.
- Ranking must follow explicit trade-offs, not vague preference.
- The final recommendation should say what to do now, not just what sounds best.
Example invocation
/options-challenge Finalizer: Claude. Log File: gtm-paths-q3. Decision Brief: Compare three GTM paths for an AI debate product: direct-to-student subscription, educator-led adoption, or partnerships with debate organizations. Constraints: tiny team, low sales capacity, need traction in one quarter.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: biyachuev
- Source: biyachuev/claude-debate-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.