AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Options Challenge

skill-biyachuev-claude-debate-skills-options-challenge · by biyachuev

Compare several strategic options, force explicit trade-offs, and rank the strongest path. Use when the user has multiple plausible directions and wants a sharper decision memo.

No reviews yet
0 installs
24 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-biyachuev-claude-debate-skills-options-challenge

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-biyachuev-claude-debate-skills-options-challenge)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Options Challenge? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Options Challenge

Use this skill for decisions where at least two plausible paths exist and the user wants ranking, trade-offs, and a final recommendation.

Treat $ARGUMENTS as the full decision brief.

Non-negotiable rules

  1. If Codex is not available in the current Claude Code session, say that explicitly and stop. Do not fabricate Codex output.
  2. Show the option framing, challenge, and ranking visibly in the chat.
  3. Unless the user opted out of logging, save the full visible output to a resolved log path.
  4. If logging is enabled, show the exact log path at the start and confirm save success or failure at the end.

Log file resolution

Accept either Log File: or Save As: in the user brief.

Resolve the log path with these rules:

  1. If the user passes No Log, Log: none, or Log File: none, skip all file writing. Do not resolve a path, do not create directories, do not save anything.
  2. A bare filename such as go-to-market-options becomes .claude/debate-logs/go-to-market-options.md.
  3. A filename with .md stays as given under .claude/debate-logs/.
  4. A relative path with folders such as notes/decisions/go-to-market-options.md is used relative to the project root.
  5. If omitted, default to .claude/debate-logs/${CLAUDE_SESSION_ID}-options-challenge.md.
  6. Create parent directories if needed.

Protocol

  1. Extract or infer:
  • decision brief
  • goal
  • constraints
  • selected finalizer
  • resolved log path (skip if logging is disabled)
  1. Claude frames 2-4 distinct options.
  2. Codex challenges each option:
  • strongest upside
  • major downside
  • execution risk
  • what must be true for it to work
  1. Claude revises the framing and produces a preliminary ranking.
  2. Codex pressure-tests the top-ranked option and the runner-up.
  3. The finalizer produces:
  • final ranking
  • recommendation
  • why not the alternatives

Required chat format

  • Log Path (omit if logging is disabled)
  • Decision Brief
  • Option Set
  • Codex Challenge
  • Top Options Stress Test
  • Revised Ranking
  • Final Recommendation
  • Why Not The Alternatives
  • Key Assumptions

Logging requirements

If the user opted out of logging, skip this entire section — do not write any files and do not print log status lines.

Write the same visible output to the resolved log path.

If the file already exists, append a new entry unless the user explicitly asks to replace it.

Each saved entry must contain:

  • date or session context if available
  • raw user brief
  • selected finalizer
  • resolved log path
  • every visible section from the answer

After saving, end with:

Log saved: or Log failed: .

Quality bar

  • Options must be materially different, not cosmetic variants.
  • Ranking must follow explicit trade-offs, not vague preference.
  • The final recommendation should say what to do now, not just what sounds best.

Example invocation

/options-challenge Finalizer: Claude. Log File: gtm-paths-q3. Decision Brief: Compare three GTM paths for an AI debate product: direct-to-student subscription, educator-led adoption, or partnerships with debate organizations. Constraints: tiny team, low sales capacity, need traction in one quarter.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.