AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Test Case Design

skill-blueprintos-analysis-to-delivery-test-case-design · by BlueprintOS

测试用例设计 — 覆盖正常路径、边界条件、异常路径、合规校验、性能安全 5 大类用例。开发前需定义验收标准、为测试团队提供输入时调用本 skill,确保 BRD 功能点全部可验证。

No reviews yet
0 installs
34 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-blueprintos-analysis-to-delivery-test-case-design

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-blueprintos-analysis-to-delivery-test-case-design)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Test Case Design? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Test-Case-Design — 测试用例设计

Contract

  • 输入: 已签字的 BRD,可选 04-合规评审.md,业务规则与验收标准
  • 输出: 07-测试用例设计.md
  • 门控: BRD 功能已覆盖;正常/边界/异常/合规 4 大类齐;用户签字
  • Required rules: stage-gate, no-field-guessing, doc-numbering, goal-boundary
  • Required paths: knowledge-path, doc-naming-path
  • 下一步: /to-prd

适用场景

  • BRD 通过,需要明确"什么算成功"
  • 开发前需要验收标准
  • 测试团队需要用例输入

流程步骤

1. 加载模板

  • templates/TEST_CASE_DESIGN.md

2. 覆盖范围

按以下 5 大类逐项设计:

| 类别 | 内容 | 占比建议 | |---|---|---| | 正常路径 | 主流程 happy path | 30% | | 边界条件 | 极值、空值、最大/最小 | 20% | | 异常路径 | 错误输入、超时、外部依赖失败 | 30% | | 合规校验 | 数据授权、审计、效期锁定 | 10% | | 性能/安全 | 并发、SQL 注入、XSS | 10% |

3. 用例结构

每条用例至少包含:

| 字段 | 说明 | |---|---| | 用例编号 | TC-{模块}-{序号} | | 关联需求 | BRD §{章节} | | 前置条件 | 初始数据/状态 | | 输入 | 测试数据 | | 操作步骤 | 步骤化 | | 预期结果 | 精确、可验证 | | 实际结果 | 测试执行时填 | | 通过条件 | PASS/FAIL 判定标准 |

4. 业务规则回测(从 BRD §四 提取)

对每条业务规则设计至少 1 个用例:

  • 正向:触发条件满足 → 期望行为
  • 反向:触发条件不满足 → 期望拦截
  • 边界:临界值

输出

  • 07-测试用例设计.md

调用的 rule

  • rules/stage-gate — 阶段 5 门控

结束条件

  • [ ] 用例覆盖 BRD §四 全部功能点
  • [ ] 异常路径 100%(每条主流程至少 1 个异常用例)
  • [ ] 业务规则正向 + 反向 + 边界 三类齐
  • [ ] 合规校验用例关联到合规评审条款
  • [ ] 用户签字进入 /to-prd

反模式

  • ❌ 5 大类缺一(正常路径/边界条件/异常路径/合规校验/性能安全) — testcase-coverage-check.py --strict 直接 fail
  • ❌ TC 编号不规范(TC-001 写成 Test001) — 必须 TC-N-xxx / TC-B-xxx / TC-E-xxx / TC-C-xxx / TC-P-xxx 前缀
  • ❌ 合规校验用例未关联到合规条款 — 每条 TC-C-* 必须标 GSP-XXX / GDPR-Art-X 等条款号
  • ❌ 只写正常路径不写异常 — 主流程:异常用例比例 ≥ 1:1,异常路径 ≥ 90% 覆盖
  • ❌ 性能测试写"应该很快" — 必须量化(P95 < Xs / 并发 Y 单/秒)
  • ❌ 用例步骤空泛("操作直到成功") — 必须分 1/2/3/4 步,每步可复现

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.