AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Git Commit

skill-bostonaholic-team-git-commit · by bostonaholic

Git commit discipline methodology — loaded by the ship phase to produce well-formed commits following conventional commits format, the 50/72 rule, and atomic commit principles

No reviews yet
0 installs
25 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-bostonaholic-team-git-commit

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-bostonaholic-team-git-commit)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Git Commit? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Git Commit Methodology

A commit is the permanent record of a decision. A well-formed commit answers three questions: what changed, why it changed, and how to understand the change in isolation. Every commit should be correct on its own — readable without surrounding context, reversible without side effects, and meaningful in the project history.

The 50/72 Rule

Subject Line (50 characters)

The subject line is what appears in git log --oneline, GitHub PR titles, and email notifications. Keep it under 50 characters.

  • Imperative mood. "Add user authentication" not "Added user

authentication" or "Adds user authentication". Write as if completing the sentence "This commit will..."

  • No period at the end. The subject is a title, not a sentence.
  • Capitalize the first word (after the type prefix in Conventional Commits).
  • Be specific. "Fix bug" is not useful. "Fix null dereference in token

parser" is useful.

Body (72 characters per line)

The body explains the why, not the what. The diff shows what changed. The body answers questions the diff cannot answer.

  • Separate from subject with a blank line. This is how git distinguishes

subject from body.

  • Wrap at 72 characters. Many tools display git output in 80-column

terminals; leaving 8 characters of margin prevents ugly wrapping.

  • Explain motivation. Why was this change necessary? What problem does

it solve? What would happen if this commit did not exist?

  • Note non-obvious consequences. If this commit changes behavior that

callers depend on, say so. If it requires a migration, say so. If it intentionally breaks something to fix something else, say so.

Conventional Commits

Use the Conventional Commits specification for all commit messages:

[optional scope]: 

[optional body]

[optional footer(s)]

Types

| Type | When to use | |------|-------------| | feat | A new feature visible to users or API consumers | | fix | A bug fix that corrects existing behavior | | refactor | Code restructuring that does not change behavior or add features | | test | Adding or modifying tests only | | docs | Documentation only changes | | chore | Build process, tooling, dependency updates | | perf | Performance improvement | | ci | CI/CD configuration changes | | revert | Reverting a previous commit |

Scope (Optional)

Scope narrows which part of the codebase was changed. Use the component, module, or layer name: feat(auth):, fix(api):, docs(readme):.

Breaking Changes

Breaking changes must be flagged in the footer with BREAKING CHANGE::

feat(api): change authentication endpoint to use Bearer tokens

BREAKING CHANGE: The /auth endpoint now expects Authorization: Bearer 
instead of the previous X-API-Key header. Callers must update their headers.

Alternatively, append ! to the type: feat!: or feat(api)!:.

Atomic Commits

An atomic commit is the smallest unit of change that is independently correct.

One Logical Change Per Commit

A commit should contain exactly one logical change. If you find yourself writing "and" in the commit message, the commit probably contains two changes that should be two commits.

Bad: "Fix login bug and add user profile endpoint" Good: Two separate commits — one for the fix, one for the endpoint.

Each Commit Must Pass Tests

Every commit in the history should leave the codebase in a passing state. A commit that breaks tests "but the next commit fixes it" makes git bisect unreliable and CI results meaningless.

Stage Selectively

Use git add -p to stage individual hunks rather than entire files. This allows you to separate logically distinct changes that happened to be in the same file during development.

Writing the Ship Phase Commit

When the ship phase creates the final commit for a feature, apply these principles:

  1. Summarize the feature, not the implementation steps. The ship commit

represents the complete feature, not a log of how it was built. Write the subject as the feature's user-visible effect.

  1. List significant changes in the body. If the feature touched multiple

files or subsystems, enumerate them briefly. The PR description can go deeper; the commit body should orient future git log readers.

  1. Reference the issue or plan. If there is an issue number or plan

document, cite it: Closes #42 or Implements docs/plans/2026-01-15-auth-plan.md.

  1. Filter out noise. The ship commit should not mention intermediate

steps, failed attempts, or implementation details that are already self-evident from the diff.

Example Ship Commit

feat(auth): add OAuth2 login with GitHub provider

Implements GitHub OAuth2 flow: redirect to GitHub, exchange code for token,
create or update user record, issue session cookie.

New files:
- handlers/oauth_callback.go — token exchange and session creation
- middleware/session.go — cookie validation for protected routes

Closes #127

Common Commit Mistakes

| Mistake | Example | Fix | |---------|---------|-----| | Vague subject | "Fix stuff" | "Fix token expiry check in session middleware" | | Past tense | "Added config option" | "Add config option" | | No body when needed | Commits a complex change with only a subject | Add body explaining why | | WIP commit in history | "WIP: still debugging" | Squash into a meaningful commit before shipping | | Multiple unrelated changes | "Fix bug, add feature, update deps" | Split into three commits | | Trailing period | "Fix null dereference." | "Fix null dereference" |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.