Install
$ agentstack add skill-bradtaylorsf-alphaagent-team-pr-review ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
/pr-review - Pull Request Review
Conducts comprehensive code review of a pull request using the git-pr-reviewer agent.
Workflow
1. Identify PR to Review
If user provided PR number/URL:
gh pr view --json title,body,author,files
If no argument provided:
# Find PR for current branch
gh pr list --head $(git branch --show-current)
If no PR found: Error and suggest using /push first.
2. Launch git-pr-reviewer Agent
Use the Task tool to launch git-pr-reviewer agent with the PR number.
3. The Agent Will
Fetch PR details and diff:
gh pr view --json title,body,author,files,additions,deletions
gh pr diff
Analyze changes for:
- Security: secrets, SQL injection, XSS, authentication gaps
- Correctness: null safety, error handling, edge cases
- Performance: N+1 queries, complexity, memory leaks
- Maintainability: readability, naming, DRY violations
- Test coverage: adequate tests for changes
Generate structured review:
- Critical issues (must fix)
- Major concerns (should address)
- Minor suggestions (nice to have)
- Positive observations (good practices)
Post review to GitHub (with permission).
4. After Review
Provide:
- Summary of findings
- Review status (Approve/Request Changes/Comment)
- Suggested next steps
Usage
/pr-review # Review PR for current branch
/pr-review 123 # Review specific PR number
/pr-review #456 # Review specific PR
Review Categories
Critical Issues
- Security vulnerabilities
- Data loss risks
- Authentication/authorization gaps
- Breaking changes
Major Concerns
- Logic errors
- Missing error handling
- Performance problems
- Incomplete implementation
Minor Suggestions
- Code style improvements
- Refactoring opportunities
- Documentation gaps
- Test coverage
Positive Observations
- Clean code patterns
- Good error handling
- Comprehensive tests
- Clear documentation
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: bradtaylorsf
- Source: bradtaylorsf/alphaagent-team
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.