Install
$ agentstack add skill-brain-ai-biz-skill-scout-skill-scout ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ● Environment & secrets Used
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
skill-scout
The safety layer for growing your Claude Code setup. Every directory online ranks popularity; none tells you if an extension will read your .env or rug-pull after you trust it. skill-scout adds the missing signal: it finds the good ones and vets them.
SKILL_DIR below = the folder this file lives in. Run the CLI as python3 SKILL_DIR/scripts/scout.py ... (no cd needed). Requires Python 3.9+ and git; the gh CLI is optional but removes GitHub rate limits.
Golden rules (never break)
- Never promise "safe". This is static analysis + reputation. Always give the caveat
(references/verdict-template.md) and separate "what I scanned in the code" (facts) from "what is a reputation signal" (inference).
- Never install without explicit approval, and never offer install for band 4-5.
- SHA-pin every install and record it, so a future update can be re-vetted (rug-pull defense).
- Respond in the user's language. No em-dashes - use a hyphen.
- The vetter never runs the cloned code. Don't work around that.
Mode A - Discover ("find me a skill for…")
Use when the user wants ideas, or has a goal but not a specific repo.
1. Understand them first (don't ask what you can read). Skim their Claude Code setup: CLAUDE.md, any memory file, recent history, installed extensions. Form a one-line hypothesis of what they do and where an extension could help.
2. Ask 2-4 sharp questions (use AskUserQuestion). Pick what's actually unclear:
- General sweep or a specific idea in mind?
- The goal behind it (what would "great" look like)?
- Which ecosystems are in scope - Skills / MCP servers / plugins / commands? (default: all)
- Any hard constraints (no cloud, no API key, must be free)?
3. Translate intent to English search terms - the directories are English-indexed, even if the user writes in another language.
4. Run discovery (once per ecosystem in scope):
python3 SKILL_DIR/scripts/scout.py discover "" --eco skill --limit 8
--eco ∈ skill | mcp | plugin | command. Returns JSON: ranked candidates each with score (0-100 Tier-1 reputation), score_band, stars, source, repo_url, requires_code_execution.
5. Present the shortlist per references/verdict-template.md (table: # · name · what it does · outputs · score 1-100 · why/why-not · link), in the user's language. State plainly that the score is reputation, not a code audit. Close by offering a deep vet on any of them.
Mode B - Vet ("is this safe?")
Use when the user names a specific extension, or picks one from the shortlist.
1. Run the deep static scan:
python3 SKILL_DIR/scripts/scout.py vet [--ref ]
Returns JSON: band (1-5), band_label, sha (the exact commit scanned), findings (category · severity · file:line · snippet), green_flags, severity_counts.
2. Adjudicate findings yourself (this is the LLM half of "hybrid").
- band 1-2: trust the scan. Summarize.
- band 3+ or any HIGH/CRITICAL: do NOT just relay the scanner. **Read the actual flagged
lines** (fetch the file - raw GitHub URL or git show) and judge real-vs-false-positive. The scanner is deliberately trigger-happy; your job is to confirm intent.
- Borderline trust: escalate reputation - a quick
WebSearch/WebFetchon the publisher +
repo (or spawn a research subagent) for incidents, age, who they are.
3. Give the final verdict per references/verdict-template.md: risk band + label, the code facts, the reputation signal, green flags, one honest bottom line, and the mandatory caveat. Optionally collapse to a 1/2/3 shorthand (rubric) but keep the 1-5 band in any record.
4. Scoring meaning lives in references/scoring-rubric.md; the detection rules in references/threat-model.md. Read them if unsure how a number was reached.
Install on approval (only after a vet)
For band 1-2 (or band 3 the user explicitly accepts after your review):
python3 SKILL_DIR/scripts/scout.py install --name --sha --band --score
This clones the exact vetted commit into ~/.claude/skills//, strips .git (static copy), records it in ~/.claude/skill-scout/registry.json, and reports whether a SKILL.md loaded. Then tell the user: it's pinned to ``; if it updates later, ask skill-scout to re-vet before pulling the new version.
- MCP / plugins (Phase 2):
installreturns the exactclaude mcp add//plugin install
command for the user to run - it does not auto-execute these yet. Hand them the command + your verdict; never run it silently.
- band 4-5: never offer install. State it's not recommended and why, in one clear line.
Honesty discipline
- Mark every claim: scanned-in-code vs reputation-signal.
- "Clean scan" = "no known red flags found", not "proven safe". Say it that way.
- If a source failed or returned nothing (e.g. a flaky directory), say so - don't imply full
coverage.
Scope notes
- This release fully covers the Skills ecosystem (discover + vet + install). MCP / plugins /
commands: discovery works now; deep MCP-poisoning + hooks scanning and auto-install are planned. Be honest about that boundary when asked.
- Sources are config:
references/sources.yaml. The skills.sh audit is a cross-check, never sole
truth.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: Brain-ai-biz
- Source: Brain-ai-biz/skill-scout
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.