AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Covenant Analysis

skill-brainbytes-dev-everything-claude-finance-covenant-analysis · by brainbytes-dev

A Claude skill from brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance.

No reviews yet
0 installs
13 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-brainbytes-dev-everything-claude-finance-covenant-analysis

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-brainbytes-dev-everything-claude-finance-covenant-analysis)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
6mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Covenant Analysis? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

covenant-analysis

Covenant analysis — financial covenants, incurrence vs maintenance tests.

When to Activate

  • Reviewing loan agreements or bond indentures for covenant terms
  • Analyzing covenant headroom and breach risk
  • Negotiating covenant packages in new financing
  • Assessing EBITDA adjustments and their impact on covenant compliance
  • Evaluating covenant-lite structures versus traditional covenant packages
  • Monitoring portfolio companies for covenant compliance
  • Advising on waiver or amendment processes following a potential breach

Core Concepts

Covenant Types

Financial covenants — quantitative tests on financial metrics:

  • Leverage ratio: Net Debt / EBITDA — most common. Typically tested quarterly on a trailing twelve-month (TTM) basis
  • Interest coverage ratio (ICR): EBITDA / Interest Expense. Ensures the borrower can service debt from operating cash flow
  • Fixed charge coverage ratio (FCCR): (EBITDA - Capex - Taxes) / (Interest + Scheduled Principal). More conservative than ICR — captures total fixed obligations
  • Debt service coverage ratio (DSCR): Net Operating Income / Total Debt Service. Common in project finance and real estate
  • Minimum EBITDA or revenue: Absolute floor rather than a ratio — prevents the denominator problem when EBITDA approaches zero
  • Maximum capex: Limits annual capital expenditure. Unused amounts may carry forward (basket mechanics)

Affirmative covenants — actions the borrower must take:

  • Deliver financial statements (monthly, quarterly, annual audited)
  • Maintain insurance, pay taxes, comply with laws
  • Provide compliance certificates with each reporting period
  • Notify lenders of material adverse changes or events of default

Negative covenants — restrictions on borrower actions:

  • Limitations on additional indebtedness (debt incurrence tests, permitted debt baskets)
  • Restrictions on liens, asset sales, dividends/distributions, investments, affiliate transactions
  • Change of control provisions (often trigger mandatory prepayment or put right)
  • Limitations on mergers, consolidations, and fundamental changes

Maintenance vs. Incurrence Covenants

Maintenance covenants (tested periodically):

  • Must be satisfied at each testing date (typically quarterly)
  • Breach triggers a default (or event of default after cure period)
  • Common in leveraged loans and bank facilities
  • Provide early warning and lender intervention rights

Incurrence covenants (tested only upon a specific action):

  • Must be satisfied only when the borrower takes a specified action (e.g., incurring new debt, making a distribution, completing an acquisition)
  • If the borrower takes no action, the covenant is never tested — even if financial performance deteriorates
  • Standard in high-yield bonds
  • Less protective for creditors but more flexible for borrowers

Leverage Ratio

The centerpiece of most covenant packages:

  • Definition matters: Net Debt typically includes funded debt minus unrestricted cash. EBITDA definition is negotiated and often includes extensive add-backs
  • Typical levels by risk profile:
  • Investment grade: 2.00x | 3.25x | 62.5% | Pass

Fixed Charge Coverage | (EBITDA-Capex) / DS | > 1.10x | 1.35x | 22.7% | Pass Max Capex | Annual capex | < $25M | $21.2M | 15.2% | Pass

Binding covenant: Net Leverage (tightest headroom at 11.8%) Trend: Headroom narrowing — was 18.5% two quarters ago


### EBITDA Bridge (Accounting to Covenant)

EUR M Reported EBITDA (Accounting) 42.0

  • Stock-based compensation 3.5
  • Restructuring charges 2.8
  • Transaction / advisory fees 1.2
  • Non-recurring litigation costs 0.9
  • Run-rate synergies (capped at 20%) 4.0
  • Pro forma acquisition EBITDA 6.5
  • Pro forma disposal EBITDA (2.1)

Adjusted EBITDA (Covenant Definition) 58.8

Adjusted EBITDA is 40% higher than reported EBITDA. Run-rate synergies represent 6.8% of Adjusted EBITDA (within 20% cap).


### Covenant Sensitivity Matrix

Revenue Decline from Base Case: 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% Net Leverage 4.85x 5.12x 5.45x 5.88x 6.42x Covenant Max 5.50x 5.50x 5.50x 5.50x 5.50x Headroom 11.8% 6.9% 0.9% BREACH BREACH

Margin Compression from Base Case: 0bp -100bp -200bp -300bp -400bp Net Leverage 4.85x 5.05x 5.28x 5.55x 5.86x Headroom 11.8% 8.2% 4.0% BREACH BREACH

Breakeven: Revenue can decline ~9.5% or margins compress ~220bp before leverage covenant breach (assuming no management action).


### Waiver / Amendment Checklist
  1. Identify the covenant(s) at risk and projected breach date
  2. Quantify the severity: How far below/above threshold?
  3. Assess cure rights: Equity cure available? How many remain?
  4. Prepare amendment request:
  • Revised covenant levels sought (temporary or permanent)
  • Business plan demonstrating path to compliance
  • Consideration offered (fee, margin increase, additional reporting)
  1. Lender group dynamics: Required majority (typically 50-66.7%)
  2. Timeline: Allow 4-8 weeks for syndicated facilities
  3. Legal review: Confirm no cross-default triggers in other facilities

## Quality Gate

- [ ] Credit agreement definitions extracted verbatim — EBITDA, Net Debt, and each covenant metric
- [ ] All permitted add-backs identified and mapped to financial line items
- [ ] Covenant compliance calculated using the agreement definition, not management's adjusted figures
- [ ] Headroom analyzed for each covenant; binding constraint identified
- [ ] Forward projection models covenant metrics under at least three scenarios (base, upside, downside)
- [ ] Breakeven analysis completed — identifies the performance decline that triggers a breach
- [ ] Cure rights documented: number remaining, amount, consecutive quarter restrictions
- [ ] Cross-default provisions checked across all facilities
- [ ] Step-down schedule tracked — upcoming tightening of covenant levels flagged
- [ ] EBITDA add-back caps verified; run-rate synergies tested for reasonableness
- [ ] Compliance certificate template matches the credit agreement requirements

## Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

- **Author:** [brainbytes-dev](https://github.com/brainbytes-dev)
- **Source:** [brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance](https://github.com/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance)
- **License:** MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.