AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Compliance Priorities

skill-bromso-metapowers-compliance-priorities · by bromso

Prioritize regulations by business impact, deadline, and customer demand

No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-bromso-metapowers-compliance-priorities

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Compliance Priorities? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Compliance Priorities

Prioritize the applicable regulations for "$ARGUMENTS" by business impact, enforcement deadlines, and customer demand to determine the optimal compliance sequence.

Prerequisites

None — this is a Phase 0 (Scope) skill.

Process

  1. Read context files:
  • Read plugins/compliance/shared/grc-lifecycle-guide.md for GRC methodology reference
  • Read .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md for the regulation inventory
  1. Business impact scoring:
  • For each applicable regulation, score revenue at risk without certification (0-10)
  • Assess deal-blocking potential — how often is this certification requested in sales cycles?
  • Estimate market access impact — does non-compliance lock out entire markets or verticals?
  1. Urgency scoring:
  • Score enforcement deadline proximity (0-10) — active enforcement vs. upcoming vs. future
  • Score customer deadline pressure (0-10) — immediate customer requirements vs. nice-to-have
  • Flag any regulations with imminent deadlines or recent enforcement actions
  1. Effort scoring:
  • Score implementation complexity (0-10) — scope of changes needed
  • Estimate time to certification (months)
  • Assess internal capability gaps — can this be done in-house or requires external help?
  1. Priority ranking:
  • Calculate weighted priority score (business impact 40%, urgency 35%, inverse effort 25%)
  • Rank regulations from highest to lowest priority
  • Identify quick wins (high impact, low effort) vs. strategic investments (high impact, high effort)
  • Group into tiers: Tier 1 (immediate), Tier 2 (next 6 months), Tier 3 (12+ months)
  1. Write the artifact to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md (append to existing) with sections:
  • Scoring Matrix — table with impact, urgency, effort, and weighted scores per regulation
  • Priority Tiers — Tier 1/2/3 groupings with rationale
  • Quick Wins — low-effort, high-impact regulations to tackle first
  • Strategic Investments — high-effort certifications that unlock major business value
  • Dependencies — regulations that build on each other (e.g., ISO 27001 before CSA STAR)

Output

The priority analysis appended to .metapowers/compliance/$ARGUMENTS/00-scope.md. Present a summary to the user highlighting:

  • Top 3 priority regulations and why
  • Identified quick wins
  • Key dependencies between certifications
  • Recommended next step: run /compliance:control-framework $ARGUMENTS

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.