Install
$ agentstack add skill-btspoony-mstar-harness-mstar-compound-refresh ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
mstar-compound-refresh(知识维护)
Load order
Read mstar-harness-core first. Path symbols → mstar-plan-conventions. On conflict, mstar-harness-core wins.
Purpose
Knowledge documents in {KNOWLEDGE_DIR} age. Code changes, conventions evolve, patterns become obsolete. mstar-compound-refresh audits the knowledge store against the current codebase and makes it trustworthy again.
产物与操作路径
SSOT: mstar-plan-conventions/references/artifact-storage-paths.md。本 skill 仅操作 {HARNESS_DIR}/knowledge/**/*.md + {HARNESS_DIR}/knowledge/README.md + /CONCEPTS.md + {HARNESS_DIR}/status.json(引用更新)。禁止操作 docs/、{PLAN_DIR}/、{ITERATION_DIR}/、{SPECS_DIR}/。
> Engine check (when available): run mstar compound validate --knowledge-dir (or import { scopeGuard, compoundRefreshScope } from "@mstar-harness/engine" in a host hook) to resolve the allowed scope above ({HARNESS_DIR}/knowledge/**, knowledge/README.md, /CONCEPTS.md, {HARNESS_DIR}/status.json) and guard every write against it. On fail -> do not proceed; fix and re-run. Skill text below remains authoritative when the runtime is absent.
When to use
| Trigger | Example | |---------|---------| | mstar-compound detected overlapping docs | "Two docs cover N+1 queries — consider refresh" | | Scheduled maintenance | "It's been a quarter, let's audit knowledge" | | Domain refactored | After a major module rewrite | | Explicit user request | /pm compound-refresh performance-issues | | Project knowledge bootstrap | No/stale/partial STRATEGY.md, CONCEPTS.md, or {KNOWLEDGE_DIR} — see below |
Bootstrap vs refresh
| Mode | When | Procedure | |------|------|-----------| | Refresh | {KNOWLEDGE_DIR} exists; audit accuracy, merge overlaps, delete stale docs | This skill § Process (Phases 1–6) | | Bootstrap | No knowledge scaffolding, or artifacts are absent/stale enough to warrant full distillation from codebase | references/project-knowledge-bootstrap.md (7-phase: survey → STRATEGY.md → CONCEPTS.md → baseline knowledge → indexing → harness init → commit) |
Read the bootstrap reference on demand; do not paste its body into this SKILL.md.
Maintenance outcomes
For each candidate document, classify into one of five outcomes:
| Outcome | Meaning | Default action | |---------|---------|----------------| | Keep | Still accurate and useful | No edit; report reviewed | | Update | Core solution correct, references drifted | In-place edits (paths, module names, code snippets) | | Consolidate | Two+ docs overlap heavily, both correct | Merge unique content into canonical doc, delete subsumed | | Replace | Old doc is misleading; known better replacement exists | Create trustworthy successor, then delete old | | Delete | No longer useful, applicable, or distinct | Delete — git history preserves it |
Core rules
- Evidence over opinion. Signals are inputs, not a scorecard. Use engineering judgment.
- Prefer no-write Keep. Do not update a doc just to leave a review breadcrumb.
- Match docs to reality. When code differs from doc, update the doc — not ask whether the code change was "intentional."
- Be decisive. When evidence is clear (file renamed, class moved), apply. Only ask PM when genuinely ambiguous.
- Avoid low-value churn. Don't edit for typos, polish, or cosmetic changes that don't improve accuracy.
- Delete, don't archive — except formal iteration-start §1.6 corpus hygiene (
mstar-iteration/references/iteration-corpus-hygiene.md), which moves superseded/redundant knowledge/specs to{HARNESS_DIR}/archived/knowledge|specs/. Outside that gate, git history is the archive;git log --diff-filter=D --finds deleted docs. - Evaluate document-set design. Check whether two+ docs overlap and should be consolidated. Redundant docs silently drift apart.
Scope selection
Default: user-guided
- Ask PM for scope: "All knowledge docs, a specific category, or a keyword?"
- If category: narrow to
{KNOWLEDGE_DIR}//. - If keyword: search frontmatter (
module:,tags:,problem_type:) and filenames.
PM-directed: specific scope
PM provides a scope hint (directory name, filename, module name, or keyword). Match in this order:
- Directory match under
{KNOWLEDGE_DIR}/ - Frontmatter field match
- Filename match
- Content search
Process
Phase 1: Inventory
- List all
.mdfiles under{KNOWLEDGE_DIR}/(excludingREADME.mdand index files). - Read frontmatter of each candidate.
- Group by
category/modulefor impact clustering.
Phase 2: Assess per doc
For each doc, check:
- Referenced code still exists? — grep for file paths, class names, function names mentioned.
- Referenced conventions still match? — check against current
AGENTS.md,CONCEPTS.md, lint configs. - Solution still the recommended approach? — has a newer pattern superseded it?
- Overlap with other docs? — search for same module/tags to find duplicates.
Phase 3: Classify and act
Classify each doc → Keep / Update / Consolidate / Replace / Delete. Apply changes.
Phase 4: Update indexes
- Update
{KNOWLEDGE_DIR}/README.mdindex table — update Status column, add/remove rows. - If doc was linked from
status.jsonmetadata, update references.
Phase 5: Report
Produce a maintenance report:
- Docs reviewed (count)
- Docs kept (count)
- Docs updated (list with what changed)
- Docs consolidated (list with which canonical doc merged into)
- Docs replaced (list with successor path)
- Docs deleted (list with reason)
- Docs flagged for PM review (ambiguous cases)
Phase 6: CONCEPTS.md reconciliation
If CONCEPTS.md exists, reconcile it with the refreshed knowledge:
- Terms mentioned in updated/replaced docs may need updating in CONCEPTS.md
- Terms no longer referenced may be candidates for removal
If CONCEPTS.md doesn't exist but knowledge docs contain qualifying domain terms, propose bootstrapping it (full repo-wide seed). Use references/concepts-vocabulary.md from mstar-compound for rules (read on demand — cross-skill path resolution via skill directory).
Cross-skill coordination
mstar-compound-refresh reads vocabulary rules from mstar-compound's references. At runtime, resolve the path from the loaded skill directory:
The CONCEPTS.md vocabulary rules are in the mstar-compound skill at:
references/concepts-vocabulary.md
Read that file from the mstar-compound skill directory before Phase 6.
NOT to do
- Do not delete docs without checking for inbound links
- Do not "archive" — delete instead
- Do not ask PM about mechanical updates (path fixes, renamed modules)
- Do not change code to match outdated docs — update docs to match code
- Do not run without PM approval for destructive actions (Delete, Replace)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: btspoony
- Source: btspoony/mstar-harness
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.