Install
$ agentstack add skill-builderced-agent-skills-data-sovereignty-patterns ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Data Sovereignty Patterns
> DISCLAIMER: Guidance only. Cross-border data transfers require legal assessment specific to your situation.
When to Use
- Choosing cloud providers (data residency requirements)
- Using AI APIs that process data outside the EU
- Designing data architecture for multi-region deployments
- Assessing compliance for international data flows
- Responding to data localization requirements
EU → Non-EU Transfer Mechanisms
After Schrems II (CJEU C-311/18), transferring personal data outside the EEA requires:
1. Adequacy Decisions (Easiest)
Countries deemed adequate by the European Commission:
| Country | Decision Date | Notes | |---------|--------------|-------| | UK | 2021 (renewed) | Post-Brexit, includes sunset clause | | Japan | 2019 | Mutual adequacy | | South Korea | 2022 | Comprehensive | | USA | 2023 (EU-US DPF) | Data Privacy Framework, requires self-certification | | Canada | 2001 | Commercial only (PIPEDA) | | Switzerland | 2000 | Comprehensive | | Israel | 2011 | Comprehensive | | New Zealand | 2012 | Comprehensive | | Argentina | 2003 | Comprehensive | | Uruguay | 2012 | Comprehensive |
For adequate countries: transfer freely, no additional mechanism needed.
2. Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs)
For non-adequate countries, use EU-approved SCC templates:
| Module | Scenario | |--------|----------| | Module 1 | Controller → Controller | | Module 2 | Controller → Processor (most common: you → cloud provider) | | Module 3 | Processor → Sub-processor | | Module 4 | Processor → Controller |
Required: Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA) evaluating recipient country laws.
3. Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs)
For intra-group transfers within multinational companies. Complex, expensive, long approval (~18 months).
Data Localization by Region
| Region | Requirement | Affected Data | |--------|-------------|---------------| | EU/EEA | Transfer mechanism required for export | Personal data (GDPR) | | Russia | Localization of Russian citizens' data | Personal data | | China | Security assessment for cross-border transfers | Personal data + "important data" | | India | Proposed localization (DPDP Act 2023) | Sensitive personal data | | Brazil | Similar to GDPR (LGPD) | Personal data, adequacy or SCCs | | Saudi Arabia | Localization for certain sectors | Government, health, finance | | Turkey | Explicit consent or BCR for transfers | Personal data |
Architecture Patterns
Pattern 1: EU-Only Deployment
Deploy all infrastructure in EU. Simplest compliance.
- Cloud: eu-west-1, eu-central-1, eu-north-1
- AI APIs: Use EU-hosted endpoints (Anthropic EU, Azure EU OpenAI)
- Database: Supabase EU, Neon EU, PlanetScale EU
Pattern 2: Data Residency with Global Compute
- Store personal data in EU
- Process with EU-hosted compute
- Non-personal data can be global
- Use anonymization/pseudonymization before cross-border transfer
Pattern 3: Multi-Region with SCCs
- SCCs in place with all non-EU processors
- TIA completed per destination country
- Regular review of adequacy decisions
- Data mapping documenting all flows
AI-Specific Considerations
| AI Service | Data Flow | Mechanism Needed | |-----------|-----------|-----------------| | Claude API (Anthropic) | EU → US | EU-US DPF (if Anthropic self-certified) or SCCs | | OpenAI API | EU → US | EU-US DPF or SCCs | | Ollama (local) | No transfer | None (local processing) | | Azure OpenAI (EU) | EU → EU | None (intra-EEA) | | Google Vertex (EU) | EU → EU | None (if EU region selected) |
What This Skill Does NOT Do
- Does not draft SCCs or BCRs (use lawyer)
- Does not perform Transfer Impact Assessments
- Does not track adequacy decision changes in real-time
- Does not cover sector-specific rules (health, finance, defense)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: BuilderCed
- Source: BuilderCed/agent-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://skills.sh/BuilderCed/agent-skills
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.