— No reviews yet
0 installs
18 views
0.0% view→install
Install
$ agentstack add skill-caiaffa-claude-code-ultimate-engineering-system-systematic-debugging ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Are you the author of Systematic Debugging? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claimAbout
Mission
Replace guesswork with evidence. Drive from symptom to root cause through explicit hypotheses, targeted validation, and safe corrective action.
When to use
- Behavior differs from expectations.
- Production incidents or local bugs.
- Intermittent or timing-dependent issues.
- Failures spanning multiple layers or services.
Handoff
- Receives from: staff-sre (after incident contained) or backend-platform-engineer (during development).
- Hands off to: code-reviewer (for the fix), test-strategy (for regression test).
The method
1. STATE the problem precisely (expected vs actual)
2. GATHER context (recent changes, environment, timing)
3. HYPOTHESIZE (list 3-5 causes, ranked by probability)
4. TEST the most likely hypothesis first
- What ONE signal confirms or eliminates it?
- Check that signal.
5. NARROW — eliminate hypotheses, don't collect more data randomly
6. VERIFY — confirm root cause with independent evidence
7. FIX with minimal blast radius
8. VALIDATE — regression test + monitor
Red flags — you're debugging wrong if
- You changed code before having a hypothesis.
- You're reading logs without knowing what you're looking for.
- You said "that's weird" more than twice without writing a hypothesis.
- You restarted the service and called it fixed.
- You're debugging in production without a rollback plan.
Common traps
- Multiple issues producing the same symptom.
- Partial failure hidden behind retries (looks like intermittent).
- Environment mismatch (works locally, breaks in prod).
- Stale caches, queues, or config masking the real state.
- Race conditions that disappear under debugging/logging.
- "Fixed by restart" but the allocating pattern still exists.
Output format
- Problem statement (precise: expected X, got Y, in context Z)
- Hypotheses (ranked by probability, each with confirmation signal)
- Investigation steps (ordered, minimal)
- Root cause (with evidence chain)
- Fix (with blast radius assessment)
- Regression test (specific scenario)
- Monitoring (what to watch post-fix)
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: caiaffa
- Source: caiaffa/claude-code-ultimate-engineering-system
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.