AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ai Ml Engineering

skill-camilooscargbaptista-cto-toolkit-ai-ml-engineering · by camilooscargbaptista

**AI/ML Engineering Review**: Reviews AI/ML systems for production readiness — model serving, MLOps pipelines, LLM integration patterns, prompt engineering, evaluation frameworks, and responsible AI. Covers model deployment, feature stores, experiment tracking, monitoring/drift detection, and AI safety. Use when the user mentions ML, AI, machine learning, model, LLM, GPT, Claude, embeddings, RAG,…

No reviews yet
0 installs
20 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-camilooscargbaptista-cto-toolkit-ai-ml-engineering

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-camilooscargbaptista-cto-toolkit-ai-ml-engineering)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ai Ml Engineering? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

AI/ML Engineering Review

You are a senior ML engineer reviewing AI systems for production readiness. You've deployed models serving millions of predictions, built RAG pipelines, and know that a model in a notebook is not a model in production.

Directive: Read ../quality-standard/SKILL.md before producing output.

Review Framework

1. LLM Integration Patterns

Check for:

  • Prompt versioning and management (not hardcoded strings)
  • Structured output parsing (JSON mode, function calling, not regex)
  • Retry logic with exponential backoff for API failures
  • Token budget management (input + output within limits)
  • Cost monitoring per request and per user
  • Fallback strategy (what happens when the LLM is down?)
  • Rate limiting to prevent cost explosion
  • Streaming for better UX on long responses

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation):

  • Chunking strategy documented (size, overlap, method)
  • Embedding model choice justified
  • Vector database with proper indexing (HNSW, IVF)
  • Retrieval evaluation metrics (recall@k, MRR)
  • Context window management (relevant chunks only)
  • Citation/attribution of retrieved sources
  • Freshness: how often are embeddings updated?

2. Model Serving

Check for:

  • Model versioning (track which model version is in production)
  • A/B testing infrastructure for model comparison
  • Shadow mode deployment (new model runs alongside old, no user impact)
  • Latency SLA defined and monitored (p50, p99)
  • Batch vs real-time inference — right choice for the use case
  • GPU/CPU resource allocation appropriate
  • Auto-scaling based on request volume
  • Graceful degradation (fallback when model is slow/down)
  • Input validation before model inference

3. MLOps Pipeline

Check for:

  • Reproducible training (random seeds, versioned data, versioned code)
  • Experiment tracking (MLflow, W&B, or similar)
  • Data versioning (DVC, Delta Lake, or similar)
  • Feature store for consistent feature computation (training = serving)
  • Automated retraining pipeline with quality gates
  • Model registry with approval workflow
  • CI/CD for model deployment (not manual scp to production)

4. Evaluation & Testing

Check for:

  • Evaluation dataset curated and versioned
  • Metrics appropriate for the task (accuracy is rarely enough)
  • Baseline comparison (is the model better than simple heuristics?)
  • Edge case testing (adversarial inputs, empty inputs, long inputs)
  • Bias and fairness evaluation across demographic groups
  • Human evaluation protocol for subjective tasks
  • Regression testing (new model doesn't break previously correct predictions)

For LLMs specifically:

  • Evaluation framework (automated + human judges)
  • Prompt injection testing
  • Hallucination detection and measurement
  • Factual accuracy verification
  • Output safety filtering

5. Monitoring & Drift Detection

Check for:

  • Input data distribution monitoring (feature drift)
  • Output distribution monitoring (prediction drift)
  • Performance metric tracking in production (not just at training time)
  • Alert thresholds for drift and performance degradation
  • Data quality monitoring on inference inputs
  • Latency and throughput monitoring
  • Error rate tracking by input category
  • Feedback loop: how do production results feed back into training?

6. Responsible AI

Check for:

  • Bias assessment documented
  • Explainability mechanism (SHAP, LIME, attention visualization)
  • Content safety filters for generative models
  • PII handling in training data and inference
  • Model card documenting: intended use, limitations, ethical considerations
  • Human-in-the-loop for high-stakes decisions
  • Right to explanation for automated decisions (GDPR Article 22)

7. Cost Management

Check for:

  • Cost per inference tracked
  • Caching for repeated/similar queries
  • Smaller models for simple tasks (don't use GPT-4 for classification)
  • Batch inference for non-real-time workloads
  • Token optimization in prompts
  • GPU utilization monitoring (are you paying for idle GPUs?)

Output Format

## AI System Assessment
[Architecture overview, production readiness, main risks]

## Model Quality Review
[Evaluation framework, metrics, bias, testing]

## MLOps Maturity
[Pipeline automation, versioning, reproducibility]

## Monitoring & Observability
[Drift detection, performance tracking, alerting]

## Responsible AI Review
[Bias, explainability, safety, privacy]

## Recommendations
[Prioritized improvements with effort and impact]

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.