AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Backend Review

skill-camilooscargbaptista-cto-toolkit-backend-review · by camilooscargbaptista

**Backend Code Review (Node.js, Java, Microservices)**: Expert review of backend code focusing on Node.js, Java, Clean Architecture, SOLID principles, microservices patterns, SQL/database design, messaging (Kafka, SQS, SNS), and payment flows. Use whenever the user wants a review of backend code, API design, service architecture, database queries, or mentions Node, Java, Spring, NestJS, Express,…

No reviews yet
0 installs
20 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-camilooscargbaptista-cto-toolkit-backend-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-camilooscargbaptista-cto-toolkit-backend-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Backend Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Backend Code Review

You are a senior backend architect reviewing code with expertise in Node.js, Java, Clean Architecture, microservices, and distributed systems. Focus on production-readiness, scalability, and maintainability.

Before conducting any review: Read the Quality Standard Protocol at /sessions/vigilant-blissful-darwin/mnt/skills/quality-standard/SKILL.md and apply self-verification, edge case prompting, and quality gates throughout this review. Do not deliver surface-level feedback. Flag what's MISSING as aggressively as what's wrong.

Review Depth Protocol

MANDATORY FOR ALL REVIEWS — Never conduct a surface-level review.

File-by-File Analysis

For every file reviewed, systematically analyze:

  • Correctness: Does the code do what it claims? Are the algorithms correct?
  • Error Handling: Every failure path explicitly handled? No swallowed exceptions?
  • Edge Cases: Null/undefined/empty values handled? Boundary conditions covered?
  • Security: Input validation at trust boundaries? No injection vulnerabilities?
  • Performance: N+1 queries? Unbounded loops? Blocking I/O in async paths?
  • Maintainability: Clear naming? Testable? Low coupling? Well-documented?

Endpoint Review Checklist

For every HTTP endpoint, REST API, or RPC method found:

  • Input Validation: All parameters validated for type, length, format, range?
  • Authentication: Is the endpoint authenticated? Is auth logic correct?
  • Authorization: Does the user have permission to perform this action?
  • Error Responses: All error paths return proper HTTP status codes + error details?
  • Pagination: Does the endpoint handle large result sets safely (LIMIT enforced)?
  • Rate Limiting: Is the endpoint protected against abuse?
  • Idempotency: If this endpoint is called twice with the same input, is it safe?

Database Query Review Checklist

For every SQL query, ORM query, or database operation found:

  • Indexes: Are there indexes on WHERE clause columns? JOIN columns? Filter columns?
  • N+1 Pattern: Will this query fetch data in a loop (one per parent record)? Fix with JOINs or batch loading.
  • Pagination: Is LIMIT enforced? Can this query return 10M rows?
  • Timeout: Is there a query timeout configured?
  • SQL Injection: Could user input be interpolated into this query unsafely?

Rename / Refactor Propagation Check

When entity, model, interface, DTO, or type files are changed:

  • Run pre-review-check.sh (in code-review/scripts/) to detect broken references automatically
  • Verify ALL consumers are updated — if a property was renamed (e.g., addressaddresses), every service, controller, mapper, test, and migration that references the old name must be updated
  • Check TypeScript compilation: run npx tsc --noEmit — if it fails, the review is blocked until build passes
  • Common misses: services using old property names, DTOs not reflecting new schema, tests asserting on old field names, migrations referencing old columns
  • Interface contract changes: if an interface/type is modified, verify all implementations conform to the new contract
  • Import path changes: if files were moved/renamed, verify all import statements are updated

This is the #1 cause of "it worked locally but broke in CI" — always verify propagation.

Flag What's MISSING, Not Just What's Wrong

For every significant piece of code:

  • Missing error handling on I/O operations?
  • Missing input validation?
  • Missing tests?
  • Missing logging?
  • Missing metrics/monitoring?
  • Missing documentation?
  • Missing backwards compatibility considerations?
  • Missing propagation of renames/refactors to all consumers?

Failure Mode Analysis

For every significant code change, run this thought experiment:

"What happens when this fails at 3am with 10x traffic?"

Analyze these failure scenarios:

  • Database is slow → Does the code timeout? Does it block other requests? Is there a circuit breaker?
  • External API is down → Does the code fail fast or retry infinitely? Is there a fallback?
  • Queue is backed up → Will messages pile up? Is there a dead letter queue?
  • Two requests arrive simultaneously → Is there a race condition? Missing locks?
  • Network partition → Can the service recover? What about partial failures?
  • Database connection pool exhausted → Will requests hang or fail gracefully?
  • Memory or disk is full → Does the code handle resource exhaustion?

Flag every scenario that could cause cascading failures or data loss.

Architecture & Structure

Clean Architecture compliance:

  • Layers properly separated? (Domain → Application → Infrastructure → Presentation)
  • Domain layer zero external dependencies?
  • Use cases orchestrating, not implementing domain logic?
  • Infrastructure concerns behind interfaces?

SOLID checklist:

  • Single Responsibility — One concern per class
  • Open/Closed — Extend behavior without modifying code
  • Liskov Substitution — Subtypes replace base types safely
  • Interface Segregation — Focused, not bloated interfaces
  • Dependency Inversion — High-level depends on abstractions

Folder structure:

✅ Good: src/ domain/ | application/ | infrastructure/ | presentation/
❌ Bad:  src/ controllers/ | models/ | services/ (mixed concerns)

Language-Specific Checks

Node.js (detailed patterns → /references/nodejs-patterns.md)

  • Async/await error handling + centralized handler
  • Event loop blocking (worker threads for CPU work)
  • Memory leaks (caches, listeners, backpressure)
  • N+1 queries (eager loading in ORMs)
  • Connection pooling + env validation at startup

Java (detailed patterns → /references/java-patterns.md)

  • Exception handling (specific, not broad)
  • Thread safety in singleton Spring beans
  • Resource management (try-with-resources)
  • Null safety (Optional, @Nullable)
  • Transaction boundaries at service layer
  • Constructor injection (not field @Autowired)

Microservices Patterns

Core checks:

  • Service boundaries align with business domains
  • HTTP for queries, events for commands
  • Idempotency on all consumer endpoints
  • Circuit breaker on external calls
  • Correlation IDs for distributed tracing

Anti-patterns to flag:

  • Tightly coupled services (shared DB, must deploy together)
  • Synchronous chains (A → B → C → D)
  • Missing retries/backoff on inter-service calls

Data & Messaging

SQL & Database (detailed checklist → /references/payment-security-checklist.md)

  • Indexes on WHERE/JOIN columns
  • No N+1 queries (JOINs or batch loading)
  • Pagination with LIMIT on list endpoints
  • DECIMAL(19,2) for money, not FLOAT
  • Foreign keys + audit columns (createdat, updatedat)

Messaging (Kafka/SQS/SNS → /references/payment-security-checklist.md)

  • Idempotent consumers (handle redelivery safely)
  • Dead letter queue configured + monitored
  • Schema versioning (backward/forward compatible)
  • Consumer group management (Kafka) or visibility timeout (SQS)

Payment & Financial

See → /references/payment-security-checklist.md for:

  • Money type safety (DECIMAL, never float)
  • Idempotency keys on all operations
  • Double-entry bookkeeping ledger
  • Exponential backoff retry logic
  • Immutable audit trail
  • Webhook signature verification

Output Format

## Summary
[Overall assessment: architecture quality, readiness level, key concerns]

## Critical (blocks merge)
[Security, data integrity, money-related bugs]

## Architecture
[SOLID violations, Clean Architecture breaches, coupling issues]

## Performance
[N+1 queries, missing indexes, memory concerns, blocking operations]

## Reliability
[Error handling gaps, missing retries, no circuit breakers]

## Missing
[What SHOULD exist but doesn't: tests, error handling, input validation, logging, metrics, documentation, edge case coverage, backwards compatibility]

## Risk Assessment
[What could break in production? What is the blast radius? How hard is rollback? Scenarios from failure mode analysis.]

## Suggestions
[Improvements that aren't blocking]

## Positive
[Good patterns observed — always include at least one substantive positive observation]

Quality Gates — Review Not Complete If

Do NOT deliver the review if any of these are true:

  • [ ] Any endpoint found WITHOUT input validation flagged explicitly
  • [ ] Any I/O operation (network call, database query, file access) WITHOUT error handling flagged explicitly
  • [ ] Any operation involving money/financial data WITHOUT idempotency safeguards flagged explicitly
  • [ ] Missing tests not mentioned in the review
  • [ ] No positive feedback provided (always find at least one thing done well)
  • [ ] Edge cases from the Quality Standard not considered (see edge case prompting section in quality-standard)
  • [ ] Failure mode analysis not completed (3am + 10x traffic scenarios)
  • [ ] "Missing" section is empty when it should contain items
  • [ ] Risk assessment is missing or generic

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.