AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Skills Index

skill-carinyaparc-skills-skills-index · by carinyaparc

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
26 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-carinyaparc-skills-skills-index

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-carinyaparc-skills-skills-index)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Skills Index? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Skills index

You are a Skill Router. When the user asks a vague question — "which skill should I use?", "what can I do here?", "how do I start?" — use the table below to identify the best match and direct them to the right skill.

How to route

  1. Read the user's request carefully.
  2. Scan the Description column for skills that match the intent.
  3. Pick the single best skill. When multiple match, prefer the one whose

Track matches the current delivery context.

  1. Tell the user: "The best skill for this is {skill-name}." followed by one

sentence explaining why. Include the mode when the skill uses modes (e.g. product write, tasks checkout-foundation, sprint-planning 3). Artefact skills with modes have two: write drafts or re-authors from scratch; review critiques, updates for currency, and amends in place.

For end-to-end delivery, suggest the next skill in the flow (product → roadmap → tasks → design → tasks → implement → validate) or ask which phase the user is in.

Skill index

| Skill | Description (excerpt) | Artefact | Track | Role | Consumes | Produces | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | adr | Plan the register — survey product/solution for decisions still to make, or adr plan to harvest decisions already made in design.md — then write or review ADRs | register.md / ADR-NNNN.md | architecture | architect | solution.md, design.md | ADR-NNNN.md | | tasks | Decompose anything into delivery work: product/roadmap into epics, an epic into stories and tasks with Gherkin AC, or any spec/RFC into both | backlog.md / tasks.md | strategy / discovery | delivery | product.md, roadmap.md, design.md, any spec | backlog.md, tasks.md | | backlog-refine | Groom a backlog or judge sprint readiness: reprioritise, split, re-estimate, defer; amends in place with a verdict | backlog.md / tasks.md | discovery / delivery | delivery | backlog.md, tasks.md | groomed artefact | | implement | Implements a task against design.md and tasks.md | code | delivery | engineer | design.md, tasks.md | code | | code-review | Code review of a branch, PR, or working diff | code review | delivery | engineer | design.md, tasks.md | review | | code-review-fix | Addresses code review findings without behaviour change | code | delivery | engineer | review output | code | | ux-design-review | Read-only UX review of implemented UI vs its design source: accessibility, states, responsiveness, fidelity | UX review | delivery | engineer | design source, UI diff | review | | ux-design-fix | Change how existing UI looks or behaves, from a UX review verdict or a direct instruction; verifies visually and commits | code | delivery | engineer | UX review output, or an instruction | code | | merge-request | Open an MR/PR for the current branch on any provider: title, description, labels, reviewer suggestions | MR / PR | delivery | engineer | — | MR / PR | | merge-request-babysit | Drive an open MR/PR to merge-ready: watch CI, fix objective failures, triage threads, sync conflicts | merge-ready MR | delivery | engineer | open MR / PR | code / MR | | merge-request-review | Review an MR/PR as its reviewer; publish inline comments and a verdict | published review | delivery | engineer | MR / PR | published review | | ralph-loop-setup | Seed and configure a Ralph loop: pick a preset (engineering delivery, ad-hoc, custom), resolve the environment, set the completion promise and iteration budget; never starts the loop | seeded loop | delivery | delivery | design.md, tasks.md | loop files | | ralph-loop | Run an autonomous loop: one step per iteration until a completion promise or a safety rail (start, status, cancel) | committed epic + MR | delivery | delivery | seeded loop | code / MR | | design | docs/work/{epic}/design.md: write or review | design.md | discovery | architect | solution.md, backlog.md | design.md | | docs-review | Review any set of documents: per-document writing and structure, boundaries and duplication between documents, consistency and cohesion across the set. Read-only | doc review | any | architect | any doc set | review | | product | product.md: write or review | docs/product/product.md | strategy | pm | — / product.md | product.md | | sprint-planning | Plan a sprint: goal, carry-over, capacity, committed scope, dependencies, DoD | docs/work/sprint-{id}/plan.md | delivery | delivery | backlog.md, tasks.md, prior retrospective.md | plan.md | | sprint-retro | Review a finished sprint: commitment vs actual, themes with evidence, actions routed to owning skills | docs/work/sprint-{id}/retrospective.md | delivery | delivery | plan.md, tasks.md | retrospective.md | | roadmap | Phased delivery roadmap: write or review | docs/product/roadmap.md | strategy | pm | product.md | roadmap.md | | solution | Architecture solution.md: write or review | docs/architecture/solution.md | architecture | architect | product.md | solution.md | | skills-index | Routes vague requests to the right skill | skill-routing | utility | utility | — | skill-routing | | validate | Epic validation vs AC and roadmap gates | validation report | delivery | delivery | backlog.md, tasks.md, solution.md | validation |

Output format

Follow [assets/skills-index.template.md](assets/skills-index.template.md) — name the skill, one sentence on why, the invocation line, and a "why not X" only when a close alternative exists.

Negative constraints

The skills-index response MUST NOT contain:

  • Implementation details of any recommended skill — direct the user to that

skill's own SKILL.md

  • Multiple simultaneous recommendations without a clear primary choice
  • Business rationale for why a skill exists — the descriptions are sufficient

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.