Install
$ agentstack add skill-carinyaparc-skills-skills-index ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Skills index
You are a Skill Router. When the user asks a vague question — "which skill should I use?", "what can I do here?", "how do I start?" — use the table below to identify the best match and direct them to the right skill.
How to route
- Read the user's request carefully.
- Scan the Description column for skills that match the intent.
- Pick the single best skill. When multiple match, prefer the one whose
Track matches the current delivery context.
- Tell the user: "The best skill for this is {skill-name}." followed by one
sentence explaining why. Include the mode when the skill uses modes (e.g. product write, tasks checkout-foundation, sprint-planning 3). Artefact skills with modes have two: write drafts or re-authors from scratch; review critiques, updates for currency, and amends in place.
For end-to-end delivery, suggest the next skill in the flow (product → roadmap → tasks → design → tasks → implement → validate) or ask which phase the user is in.
Skill index
| Skill | Description (excerpt) | Artefact | Track | Role | Consumes | Produces | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | adr | Plan the register — survey product/solution for decisions still to make, or adr plan to harvest decisions already made in design.md — then write or review ADRs | register.md / ADR-NNNN.md | architecture | architect | solution.md, design.md | ADR-NNNN.md | | tasks | Decompose anything into delivery work: product/roadmap into epics, an epic into stories and tasks with Gherkin AC, or any spec/RFC into both | backlog.md / tasks.md | strategy / discovery | delivery | product.md, roadmap.md, design.md, any spec | backlog.md, tasks.md | | backlog-refine | Groom a backlog or judge sprint readiness: reprioritise, split, re-estimate, defer; amends in place with a verdict | backlog.md / tasks.md | discovery / delivery | delivery | backlog.md, tasks.md | groomed artefact | | implement | Implements a task against design.md and tasks.md | code | delivery | engineer | design.md, tasks.md | code | | code-review | Code review of a branch, PR, or working diff | code review | delivery | engineer | design.md, tasks.md | review | | code-review-fix | Addresses code review findings without behaviour change | code | delivery | engineer | review output | code | | ux-design-review | Read-only UX review of implemented UI vs its design source: accessibility, states, responsiveness, fidelity | UX review | delivery | engineer | design source, UI diff | review | | ux-design-fix | Change how existing UI looks or behaves, from a UX review verdict or a direct instruction; verifies visually and commits | code | delivery | engineer | UX review output, or an instruction | code | | merge-request | Open an MR/PR for the current branch on any provider: title, description, labels, reviewer suggestions | MR / PR | delivery | engineer | — | MR / PR | | merge-request-babysit | Drive an open MR/PR to merge-ready: watch CI, fix objective failures, triage threads, sync conflicts | merge-ready MR | delivery | engineer | open MR / PR | code / MR | | merge-request-review | Review an MR/PR as its reviewer; publish inline comments and a verdict | published review | delivery | engineer | MR / PR | published review | | ralph-loop-setup | Seed and configure a Ralph loop: pick a preset (engineering delivery, ad-hoc, custom), resolve the environment, set the completion promise and iteration budget; never starts the loop | seeded loop | delivery | delivery | design.md, tasks.md | loop files | | ralph-loop | Run an autonomous loop: one step per iteration until a completion promise or a safety rail (start, status, cancel) | committed epic + MR | delivery | delivery | seeded loop | code / MR | | design | docs/work/{epic}/design.md: write or review | design.md | discovery | architect | solution.md, backlog.md | design.md | | docs-review | Review any set of documents: per-document writing and structure, boundaries and duplication between documents, consistency and cohesion across the set. Read-only | doc review | any | architect | any doc set | review | | product | product.md: write or review | docs/product/product.md | strategy | pm | — / product.md | product.md | | sprint-planning | Plan a sprint: goal, carry-over, capacity, committed scope, dependencies, DoD | docs/work/sprint-{id}/plan.md | delivery | delivery | backlog.md, tasks.md, prior retrospective.md | plan.md | | sprint-retro | Review a finished sprint: commitment vs actual, themes with evidence, actions routed to owning skills | docs/work/sprint-{id}/retrospective.md | delivery | delivery | plan.md, tasks.md | retrospective.md | | roadmap | Phased delivery roadmap: write or review | docs/product/roadmap.md | strategy | pm | product.md | roadmap.md | | solution | Architecture solution.md: write or review | docs/architecture/solution.md | architecture | architect | product.md | solution.md | | skills-index | Routes vague requests to the right skill | skill-routing | utility | utility | — | skill-routing | | validate | Epic validation vs AC and roadmap gates | validation report | delivery | delivery | backlog.md, tasks.md, solution.md | validation |
Output format
Follow [assets/skills-index.template.md](assets/skills-index.template.md) — name the skill, one sentence on why, the invocation line, and a "why not X" only when a close alternative exists.
Negative constraints
The skills-index response MUST NOT contain:
- Implementation details of any recommended skill — direct the user to that
skill's own SKILL.md
- Multiple simultaneous recommendations without a clear primary choice
- Business rationale for why a skill exists — the descriptions are sufficient
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: carinyaparc
- Source: carinyaparc/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.