Install
$ agentstack add skill-ccomkhj-skills-get-feedback-markdown-plan ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Get Feedback on Markdown Plan
> ⚠️ Deprecated. Use the pair-* skill series (e.g. pair-consult, pair-optimize) instead. This skill is no longer installed and is kept only for reference.
You have a markdown plan with inline feedback annotations (e.g., [CODEX], [Claude], or similar tags). Your job is to verify whether each annotation is correct by checking it against the codebase and project context.
Workflow
- Parse — Extract all inline annotations from the plan. For each one, capture the annotation text and the plan section it refers to.
- Group — Cluster related annotations that share context (e.g., multiple comments about the same service, same migration step, or same data flow). Each group becomes one subagent task.
- Verify — Launch one subagent per group in parallel. Each subagent receives:
- The plan section(s) under review
- The annotation(s) to verify
- Instruction: explore the codebase to determine if the critique is factually correct. Return one of:
- Correct — the critique identifies a real problem. Briefly explain why.
- Wrong — the critique is incorrect or based on a false assumption. Explain what it got wrong.
- Inconclusive — cannot verify from available context. State what's missing.
- Report — Present a summary table:
| # | Annotation | Verdict | Reason | |---|-----------|---------|--------| | 1 | ... | Correct / Wrong / Inconclusive | One-line explanation |
Then list the annotations that were Wrong with full reasoning, so the user knows which feedback to ignore.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ccomkhj
- Source: ccomkhj/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.