AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Formal Correctness

skill-cdeust-zetetic-team-subagents-formal-correctness · by cdeust

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
7 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-cdeust-zetetic-team-subagents-formal-correctness

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-cdeust-zetetic-team-subagents-formal-correctness)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
7d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Formal Correctness? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Formal Correctness

Problem shape: correctness-critical code (concurrency, distribution, protocol, contract) whose failure modes tests cannot exercise. The move: specification before code, invariants before traces, contracts before implementations, decidability before optimization.

Relevant geniuses

| Agent | Use when | |---|---| | [lamport](../../agents/genius/lamport.md) | distributed design uses wall-clock ordering; no written spec; correctness argued by example executions; partial failure ignored | | [dijkstra](../../agents/genius/dijkstra.md) | code and correctness argument must be developed together; a construct defeats local reasoning; tests can't cover the failure mode | | [liskov](../../agents/genius/liskov.md) | swapping an implementation breaks callers; interfaces with types but no behavioral contract; composition breaks what components pass alone | | [turing](../../agents/genius/turing.md) | problem drowning in detail — reduce to the simplest machine; check decidability/complexity class before investing; vague concept needs an operational test | | [godel](../../agents/genius/godel.md) | the system reasons about itself (self-hosting, self-validating, self-referential rules) — find the incompleteness before it finds you | | [alkhwarizmi](../../agents/genius/alkhwarizmi.md) | messy problem needs a canonical form and an exhaustive case classification before an algorithm exists | | [panini](../../agents/genius/panini.md) | a sprawling rule set needs a compact generative specification with explicit conflict-resolution ordering |

Invocation

  1. Pick the best-fit agent above. If two or more fit, run

tools/genius-invoker.sh route "" and take the top ranked match.

  1. Load it: tools/genius-invoker.sh invoke "", then read

agents/genius/.md in full.

  1. Apply the agent's `` step by step and answer in its

``. The deliverable is a spec, invariant, or contract the code refines — not a narrative that it "looks right".

  1. Typical chain: turing bounds what is decidable → lamport writes the spec →

dijkstra derives the code → liskov contracts the interfaces. Run pairs via tools/genius-invoker.sh compose lamport dijkstra -- "".

  1. If no shape above matches, use a standard team agent instead.

Refuse when

  • The requester wants a proof-shaped blessing for unspecified behavior —

write the spec first or decline.

  • Tests are offered as the sole correctness argument for concurrent,

numerical, or adversarial code.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.