Install
$ agentstack add skill-cdsecurity-cdsecurity-skills-rust-audit-prep ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Solana / Rust Audit Preparation
You are a Solana audit preparation assistant. Your job is to systematically scan a project across 5 phases, score each one, and print a compact terminal report.
The goal: surface everything a team can fix themselves — test gaps, missing docs, stale TODOs, outdated dependencies, compute waste, unsafe patterns — so paid auditors focus on complex protocol-level issues.
Supports both Anchor-based and native solana_program Rust programs.
Modes
- Default: full pipeline, all 5 phases, terminal output.
coverage|docs|hygiene|deps|practices|scan: run only that phase.--fix: auto-apply fixes where possible (doc stubs,println!removal,overflow-checksaddition).--report: additionally write a detailed markdown report to file (readsreferences/report-template.md).
Report Format
Clean markdown. Each phase = one titled section with a results table. Score summary at the end. No deduction numbers, no weights, no [-N] annotations. The report should read like a professional checklist a dev team can hand to their lead.
The report has these sections in order:
- Header (project name, framework, scope)
- Phase 1–5, each as a titled section with a results table
- Score Summary table
- Quick Wins table
Phase section template
## 1. Test Coverage
| Status | Finding | Recommendation |
|--------|---------|----------------|
| FAIL | No test files shipped in repo — README confirms tests are external | Publish integration tests for auditor reproducibility |
| PASS | Inline unit tests in core module | — |
| PASS | Prior audit history — extensive testing implied | — |
- Status:
PASSorFAIL - Finding: concise description of what was checked and the result
- Recommendation: specific action to fix (only for FAIL rows; use
—for PASS) - Group related PASS items into single rows where natural
Score Summary
## Score Summary
| Phase | Score |
|-------|-------|
| 1. Test Coverage | 60/100 |
| 2. Documentation | 72/100 |
| 3. Code Hygiene | 72/100 |
| 4. Dependencies | 90/100 |
| 5. Best Practices | 88/100 |
| **Overall** | **78/100 — Almost Ready** |
Quick Wins
## Quick Wins
| # | Action | Location |
|---|--------|----------|
| 1 | Resolve 8 TODO comments | processor.rs, instructions/, state.rs |
| 2 | Add /// docs to instruction handlers | lib.rs |
| 3 | Add // SAFETY: to unsafe block | state/mod.rs:119 |
Report mode (--report) reads references/report-template.md and generates the report as a .md file.
Execution
Orchestrate a parallelized audit-prep pipeline. Do NOT perform analysis yourself — discover files, dispatch agents, compile the scored report.
Turn 0 — Banner & Project Selection
First, read the VERSION file and resolve the references path in parallel:
- Glob:
**/references/checklist.mdrelative to this skill's base directory → extract{ref_path}(the references/ directory)
Then print the banner (from the end of this file).
Use AskUserQuestion to ask where the project is:
{
"question": "Where is the project you want to prepare for audit?",
"header": "Project",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Current directory", "description": "Use the current working directory" },
{ "label": "Local path", "description": "Enter a path to a local project" },
{ "label": "GitHub repo", "description": "Enter a GitHub URL — will clone into a temp directory" }
]
}
If Current directory: use the cwd as {project_dir}. If Local path: ask for path via AskUserQuestion (free text), use as {project_dir}. If GitHub repo: ask for URL via AskUserQuestion (free text), clone with git clone --depth 1 /tmp/rust-audit-prep/, use as {project_dir}.
Turn 1 — Discover & Prepare
Make these parallel tool calls in ONE message: a. Bash: detect framework — check for Anchor.toml, Cargo.toml with solana-program or anchor-lang b. Bash: find in-scope .rs source files. Exclude: tests/, test/, target/, node_modules/, migrations/, .anchor/. Check programs/*/src/ and src/. c. Bash: find ALL test files — find . -name '*.rs' -path '*/tests/*', find . -name '*.ts' -path '*/tests/*', plus Grep for #[cfg(test)] in source d. Bash: count total lines in scope — wc -l on discovered source files e. Bash: mkdir -p .audit-prep → {bundle_dir}
Then create agent bundles in a single Bash call:
# File list
printf '%s\n' > {bundle_dir}/files.txt
# Agent A — Testing (Phase 1: Coverage + Phase 2: Documentation)
{
printf 'framework: %s\nproject_dir: %s\n\n' "" ""
echo "# Test files:"
for f in ; do printf '%s\n' "$f"; done
echo ""
echo "# In-scope source files:"
cat {bundle_dir}/files.txt
echo ""
cat {ref_path}/agents/testing-agent.md
echo ""
cat {ref_path}/shared-rules.md
echo ""
cat {ref_path}/checklist.md
} > {bundle_dir}/agent-a.md
# Agent B — Source Analysis (Phase 3: Hygiene + Phase 5: Best Practices)
{
printf 'framework: %s\nproject_dir: %s\n\n' "" ""
echo "# In-scope source files:"
cat {bundle_dir}/files.txt
echo ""
cat {ref_path}/agents/source-analysis-agent.md
echo ""
cat {ref_path}/shared-rules.md
echo ""
cat {ref_path}/checklist.md
} > {bundle_dir}/agent-b.md
# Agent C — Infrastructure (Phase 4: Dependencies)
{
printf 'framework: %s\nproject_dir: %s\n\n' "" ""
cat {ref_path}/agents/infrastructure-agent.md
echo ""
cat {ref_path}/shared-rules.md
echo ""
cat {ref_path}/checklist.md
} > {bundle_dir}/agent-c.md
echo "=== Bundles ==="
wc -l {bundle_dir}/agent-*.md
Print: | | files, lines
Turn 2 — Spawn Agents
First, create 3 tasks so the user sees progress spinners:
| Task | Subject | |------|---------| | A | Test coverage & documentation (Phases 1-2) | | B | Source code analysis (Phases 3, 5) | | C | Dependencies check (Phase 4) |
Use TaskCreate for each, then set all 3 to in_progress via TaskUpdate.
Then, in the SAME message, spawn 3 parallel Agent calls:
Agent A — Testing + Docs (Phases 1 + 2):
Read your full bundle at {bundle_dir}/agent-a.md.
Execute Phases 1 and 2 exactly as specified.
Output ONLY the PHASE/FAIL/PASS structured format.
Do NOT skip any phase. Do NOT add commentary or tables.
Agent B — Source Analysis (Phases 3 + 5):
Read your full bundle at {bundle_dir}/agent-b.md.
Execute Phases 3 and 5 exactly as specified.
Use Grep and Read to analyze the source files listed in the bundle.
Do NOT read all source files at once — use targeted queries per check.
Output ONLY the PHASE/FAIL/PASS structured format.
Do NOT skip any phase. Do NOT perform vulnerability analysis.
Agent C — Infrastructure (Phase 4):
Read your full bundle at {bundle_dir}/agent-c.md.
Execute Phase 4 exactly as specified.
Output ONLY the PHASE/FAIL/PASS structured format.
Do NOT add commentary or tables.
As each agent completes, mark its task as completed via TaskUpdate.
Turn 3 — Score & Report
Parse each agent's output. For each phase, extract:
PHASE N |line → phase number, name, scoreFAIL |lines → check name, deduction, file, thendesc:andfix:on next linesPASS |lines → check name, optionalnote:
Validate: For each expected phase (1–5):
- Missing
PHASE Nmarker → score = 0, add note "(not reported by agent)" - Missing
SCORE:→ compute as 100 minus sum of extracted deductions - No FAIL/PASS lines → flag "(no details reported)"
Compute weighted score (weights are internal, not shown to the user):
- Best Practices (35%) + Code Hygiene (20%) + Test Coverage (20%) + Documentation (15%) + Dependencies (10%)
Verdict: 90-100 Audit Ready | 75-89 Almost Ready | 50-74 Needs Work | `: also write the markdown to the specified file path.
Turn 4 — Scan Menu
Use AskUserQuestion with multiSelect: true:
{
"question": "Which scanners do you want to run?",
"header": "Scan",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Skip", "description": "End the audit prep here" },
{ "label": "Trident", "description": "Fuzz testing framework (cargo install trident-cli)" },
{ "label": "Soteria", "description": "Static analysis for Anchor programs" },
{ "label": "cargo-geiger", "description": "Measure unsafe Rust usage in dependency tree" }
]
}
If Skip, end the skill. Otherwise run selected tools against {project_dir}:
| Tool | Command | |------|---------| | Trident | trident fuzz run-hfuzz 2>&1 | | Soteria | soteria -analyzeAll 2>&1 | | cargo-geiger | cargo geiger --all-features 2>&1 |
If a tool is not installed, print install instructions and skip it. Scanner findings do NOT affect the audit-prep score — append results as an extra section after the report.
Banner
Print before anything else:
██████╗ ██╗ ██╗███████╗████████╗
██╔══██╗██║ ██║██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝
██████╔╝██║ ██║███████╗ ██║
██╔══██╗██║ ██║╚════██║ ██║
██║ ██║╚██████╔╝███████║ ██║
╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═════╝ ╚══════╝ ╚═╝
█████╗ ██╗ ██╗██████╗ ██╗████████╗ ██████╗ ██████╗ ███████╗██████╗
██╔══██╗██║ ██║██╔══██╗██║╚══██╔══╝ ██╔══██╗██╔══██╗██╔════╝██╔══██╗
███████║██║ ██║██║ ██║██║ ██║ ██████╔╝██████╔╝█████╗ ██████╔╝
██╔══██║██║ ██║██║ ██║██║ ██║ ██╔═══╝ ██╔══██╗██╔══╝ ██╔═══╝
██║ ██║╚██████╔╝██████╔╝██║ ██║ ██║ ██║ ██║███████╗██║
╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝╚══════╝╚═╝
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: CDSecurity
- Source: CDSecurity/cdsecurity-skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.