Install
$ agentstack add skill-ceyddrick-skills-veille-digest ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Veille Digest
Find what's worth reading this week. Not a link dump. A curated, opinionated selection of content that matters for the user's role and interests.
Philosophy
Veille is guided by a few principles:
- "Don't delegate understanding" (Steph Ango) — surface things that BUILD understanding, not things that replace thinking
- Anti-hype filter — skip the "AI will change everything" takes. Keep the "here's what actually happened when we tried" pieces.
- Practitioner over pundit — favor people who build things over people who comment on things
- Signal density — one excellent article beats ten mediocre ones. If only 2 things are worth reading this week, output 2 things.
Domains
Search across the user's domains of interest, weighted by priority. Configure these based on the user's role, current challenges, and side interests. Example structure:
1. Core domain (highest priority)
Whatever is most central to the user's work. Process, craft, strategy, tooling.
2. Practice / Tooling (practitioner angle)
Tools and workflows the user actually uses. Honest accounts of what's working and what's failing.
3. Industry / Competition (business)
Market moves, competitor news, sector shifts. Load a competitor list from a known path if one exists.
4. Thinking & Writing (personal growth)
Writing craft, clear thinking, mental models, knowledge management.
Workflow
1. Search
Run 8-12 targeted WebSearches. Be specific, not generic. Adapt queries based on the current news cycle. If a major event happened (product launch, acquisition, regulation), search for that specifically.
If an argument is provided (e.g., /veille:digest AI agents), focus the search on that topic specifically instead of the broad domain sweep.
2. Filter ruthlessly
For each result, apply these filters:
KEEP if:
- It changes how you think about something (not just confirms what you know)
- It's from a practitioner sharing real experience, not a journalist summarizing
- It has specific data, examples, or frameworks (not just opinions)
- It's relevant to a current challenge (meeting, PRD, strategy decision)
- It would make the user say "I need to save this" or "I want to react to this"
KILL if:
- It's a listicle or "top 10" without substance
- It's AI hype without evidence ("AI will revolutionize X")
- It's behind a hard paywall with no substance visible
- It's older than 1 week. Target: content from the last 7 days. Tolerance: up to 1 month if exceptionally relevant. NEVER include anything older than 1 month. WebSearch often returns old articles ranked high. ALWAYS verify the actual publication date before including (use WebFetch if unclear). If you can't confirm the date is recent, kill it. When a week is quiet, say so rather than padding with old content.
- It reads like it was written by an LLM (generic, no voice, no edge)
- It says things everyone already knows
Target: 5-8 items max. If you can't find 5 good ones, output fewer. Never pad.
3. For each keeper, assess
- Why it matters for the user specifically (link to their role, current challenges, interests)
- Rebond potential: could they react to this on social or their blog? Is there a contrarian take? A connection to their work context?
- Vault-worthy? Should this become a clipping in their notes?
4. Check against existing vault
Before presenting, search the user's clippings folder to make sure you're not surfacing something they already have.
5. Output
Write the digest to a file in the user's configured veille folder AND display it in conversation.
Filename: YYYY-WXX - Veille Digest.md (ISO week number)
File format:
---
categories:
- Veille
tags:
- veille
date: YYYY-MM-DD
week: WXX
---
# Veille — Semaine du [date]
### 1. [Titre de l'article](URL)
**[Auteur]** · [Source] · [Date]
[2-3 phrases : de quoi ça parle ET pourquoi c'est pertinent pour toi. Pas un résumé neutre. Un avis.]
[Si rebond potentiel : "Angle pour réagir : ..."]
### 2. [Titre](URL)
...
Titles MUST be clickable links to the article URL. Number each item.
After displaying the digest, ask:
Des articles à clipper dans le vault ? (numéros ou "tous")
6. Clip to vault
For each article the user wants to clip, use WebFetch to get the full content, then create a file in the clippings folder following the clipping template:
---
categories:
- article
title: "[Title]"
source: "[URL]"
author:
- "[[Author Name]]"
published: [YYYY-MM-DD]
created: [today's date]
description: "[first 200 chars of article]"
tags:
- clippings
topics: [relevant topics]
Read: false
---
AI Summary (FR)
[Dense 3-5 sentence summary in French. What the article argues, key evidence, why it matters. No filler.]
----
[Full article content in markdown]
Anti-patterns
- Never say "voici une sélection de X articles sur Y"
- Never summarize an article without an opinion on why it matters for the user
- Never include an article just because it's popular. Popular != valuable.
- Never use the word "incontournable", "révolutionnaire", or "game-changer"
- Never pad the digest to reach a number. 3 good items > 8 mediocre ones.
- Never output a "Sources:" section at the end. The sources are in the articles.
Variations
/veille:digest— full sweep across all domains/veille:digest AI agents— focused on a specific topic/veille:digest competitors— focused on the competitive landscape
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: ceyddrick
- Source: ceyddrick/skills
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.