AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Kai Gate

skill-cgallic-kai-cmo-harness-kai-gate · by cgallic

Run Kai CMO Harness quality gates on content. Scores Four U's (Unique/Useful/Ultra-specific/Urgent), checks for banned words and AI slop, runs SEO lint for search content. Use when "score this", "quality check", "run quality gates", "check this content", "four u's score", "banned word check", "SEO lint", or any request to validate content quality before publishing.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
34 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-cgallic-kai-cmo-harness-kai-gate

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-cgallic-kai-cmo-harness-kai-gate)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Kai Gate? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Run the Kai CMO Harness quality gate pipeline on a piece of content.

Gate Pipeline

Run all three checks in order:

1. Four U's Score

Score each dimension 1-4:

| U | Question | Score | |---|----------|-------| | Unique | Can only WE write this? Original data, perspective, or experience? | 1-4 | | Useful | Can the reader take action immediately? | 1-4 | | Ultra-specific | Numbers, named tools, concrete examples? | 1-4 | | Urgent | Is there a reason to engage today? | 1-4 |

Thresholds: 12/16 for blog/SEO/articles. 10/16 for email/ads.

2. Banned Word Check

Instant reject (Tier 1): leverage, utilize, synergy, innovative, deep dive, circle back, touch base, moving forward, at the end of the day

AI slop (also reject): "In conclusion", "It's important to note", "In today's rapidly evolving", "This comprehensive guide", "Without further ado", "It's worth noting that"

Flag exact locations of violations.

3. Voice Pattern Check (programmatic — DO NOT skip)

Binary clichés ("X-not-Y" / "It's not X, it's Y" / "isn't X — it's Y") read as LinkedIn slop and slip past subjective scoring. Run these regexes against the file with the Grep tool. Any match = FAIL.

| Pattern | Catches | |---|---| | , not [a-z] | "X, not Y" | | — not [a-z] | "X — not Y" | | \bisn'?t [a-z][^.\n]+ — it'?s\b | "isn't X — it's Y" | | \baren'?t [a-z][^.\n]+ — they'?re\b | "aren't X — they're Y" | | \bIt'?s (a\|the\|an) [^.\n]+, not (a\|the\|an)\b | "It's a/the X, not a/the Y" | | \bThat'?s (a\|the\|an) [^.\n]+, not (a\|the\|an)\b | "That's a/the X, not a/the Y" | | \bIf you [a-z][^,.]+, [a-z] | "If you X, Y" rhetorical | | \bHere'?s the thing\b | LinkedIn slop | | \bI'?ll be honest\b | LinkedIn slop | | \bLet that sink in\b | LinkedIn slop | | \bHot take\b | LinkedIn slop |

Skip matches inside HTML comments (`) and code fences (`` ` ```) — those are scorecard / metadata blocks.

Replacements that work:

  • Collapse to a single load-bearing claim.
  • Use parallel-positive contrast where both halves are positive: "Description is passive. State is something the agent can act on."
  • Use a metaphor: "expensive webhook" not symmetrical reversal.

Project hook integration: if the project has .claude/hooks/voice-gate.py, that hook fires PostToolUse on Edit/Write and catches these patterns at draft time. The gate step still runs the regexes — belt and suspenders.

4. SEO Lint (search content only)

Apply only if the content targets search engines. Check against Algorithmic Authorship rules:

  • Conditions after main clause
  • Instructions start with verbs
  • Sentences under 20 words
  • Bold the answer, not query terms
  • No links in first sentence of paragraphs

For full rule set, read knowledge/frameworks/content-copywriting/algorithmic-authorship.md.

5. Optional Panel Scoring (advisory)

Use panel scoring only when the user asks for a second opinion or the artifact is high-stakes. It does not replace Kai gates and cannot override a hard fail from banned words, source gaps, policy risk, or missing approval.

Recommended panel roles:

  • Audience reviewer: checks persona fit and plain-language clarity
  • Channel reviewer: checks platform fit, format, and norms
  • Proof reviewer: checks source locations, attribution, and unsupported claims
  • Conversion reviewer: checks CTA clarity and objection handling

Output panel scores as advisory notes:

| Reviewer | Score | Concern | Suggested fix | |----------|-------|---------|---------------| | Audience | 1-5 | ... | ... |

Governance rules:

  • Label panel output as simulated review, never expert validation.
  • Do not create fake credentials, endorsements, or named reviewers.
  • Treat missing source locations as a gate issue, not a panel preference.
  • Run panel scoring on drafts first; publishing still requires approval.

Output Format

## Quality Gate Results

**Four U's:** [X]/16 [PASS/FAIL]
- Unique: [X]/4 — [reason]
- Useful: [X]/4 — [reason]
- Ultra-specific: [X]/4 — [reason]
- Urgent: [X]/4 — [reason]

**Banned Words:** [PASS/FAIL]
- [list violations with line numbers, or "None found"]

**AI Slop:** [PASS/FAIL]
- [list violations with line numbers, or "None found"]

**Voice Patterns:** [PASS/FAIL]
- [list X-not-Y / LinkedIn-slop violations with line numbers, or "None found"]

**SEO Lint:** [PASS/FAIL/SKIPPED]
- [list violations, or "All rules pass"]

**Overall:** [PASS/FAIL]

If FAIL: list specific fixes needed. Offer to auto-fix and re-score.

Learning hook

Gate script runs log to data/learning/gate_runs.jsonl automatically. If the same diagnosis fails twice on one piece, append a lesson to memory/lessons.md before escalating (write trigger #3 in memory/MEMORY.md). Recurring failures across pieces get mined by /kai-retro and promoted into new gate checks with golden corpus cases.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.