Install
$ agentstack add skill-choral-io-choral-skills-delivery-review ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Delivery Review
Runtime Context
Before acting, resolve ` using the runtime bootstrap rules, then read /.workflow/runtime.md and /.workflow/manifest.yml`; do not assume non-default workflow paths or default ids.
Use this skill to independently review delivery work after implementation and before completion. Review normally happens while the Kanban card is in Reviewing.
Workflow
- Read the selected card in
/planning/KANBAN.md. - Read the linked task item and source knowledge.
- Read
/.workflow/rules/knowledge.md,/.workflow/schemas/common.md, and relevant area schemas under/.workflow/schemas/for changed knowledge. - Inspect the local diff or pull request changes.
- Compare implementation against acceptance criteria, out-of-scope notes, and related decisions.
- Check that tests cover meaningful behavior changes.
- When reviewer assignment, handoff expectations, or member responsibilities matter, read only the relevant sections from
/members/.md. - Check that canonical knowledge was updated when product, user story, design, architecture, test case, metric, experiment, release, configuration, or decision knowledge changed.
- Run focused checks when practical, or report which checks were not run.
- Report findings first, ordered by severity.
- Say clearly whether the work is accepted, needs changes, or is blocked.
- Include a handoff summary when the review returns work, blocks completion, or asks another owner to continue.
Optional Superpowers Evidence
When available, Superpowers verification-before-completion output can be used as validation evidence. Still inspect the diff, tests, acceptance criteria, and knowledge updates directly; Superpowers evidence supports delivery review but does not replace it.
Kanban State
- Preferred flow: implementation complete -> approved
DoingtoReviewingmove ->delivery-review-> approvedReviewingtoDonemove. - If the card is still in
Doing, this skill may run a pre-review, but pre-review does not replace theReviewing -> Doneacceptance gate. - If review result is
minor-fix, recommend keeping the card inReviewingwhile fixes are applied. - If review result is
rework-required, recommend moving the card back toDoingthroughkanban-maintenance. - If review finds an unresolved external blocker, recommend moving the card to
Blockedand recording blocker details in the linked task item. - Before recommending
Reviewing -> Done, reverse-look up downstream tasks whoseblocked_byentries reference the completed task and check whether they require readiness or Kanban follow-up proposals.
Handoff Summary
Default review handoffs are not separate files. Put ordinary return-to-implementation or acceptance context in the review report, local work log, task item update, or Kanban maintenance request.
Create a formal shared handoff under /workspace//handoffs/ only when the review handoff is cross-member, long-lived, complex enough to survive the chat, or explicitly requested. Use /.workflow/templates/handoff.md as a reference template. Do not write into another member's workspace.
Guardrails
- Do not move the Kanban card unless the maintainer explicitly asks.
- Do not fix implementation issues during review unless explicitly asked.
- Do not use localized files as acceptance sources.
- Do not read member local workspace instructions for objective delivery acceptance.
- Treat workflow, schema, Skill, security, data handling, cross-package API, user-visible behavior, broad refactor, and failed-worker follow-up changes as review-required.
- Stop and report possible secrets or sensitive data.
- Keep review comments tied to concrete files, task criteria, or knowledge documents.
References
- For acceptance checks, result classification, handoff structure, and output details, read
references/checklist.md.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: choral-io
- Source: choral-io/choral-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://github.com/choral-io/choral-skills
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.