Install
$ agentstack add skill-choxos-biostatagent-time-to-event-methods ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Time-to-Event Methods
When to Use This Skill
- Selecting appropriate analysis methods for survival endpoints
- Handling non-proportional hazards scenarios
- Implementing weighted logrank tests
- Designing MaxCombo tests
- Using RMST or milestone endpoints
Analysis Methods Overview
Standard Logrank Test
When Optimal:
- Proportional hazards assumption holds
- Treatment effect constant over time
Formula:
Z = Σ(O_trt - E_trt) / √(Var)
simtrial Implementation:
data |> wlr(weight = fh(rho = 0, gamma = 0))
Fleming-Harrington Weighted Logrank
Weight Function:
w(t) = S(t)^ρ × (1 - S(t))^γ
Parameter Effects:
| ρ | γ | Emphasis | Best For | |---|---|----------|----------| | 0 | 0 | Uniform (standard LR) | Proportional hazards | | 0 | 0.5 | Moderate late | Moderate delayed effect | | 0 | 1 | Strong late | Strong delayed effect | | 1 | 0 | Early | Early divergence | | 0.5 | 0.5 | Balanced | Crossing hazards |
simtrial Implementation:
# Late emphasis
data |> wlr(weight = fh(rho = 0, gamma = 0.5))
# Early emphasis
data |> wlr(weight = fh(rho = 1, gamma = 0))
Magirr-Burman (MB) Weights
Design: Zero weight before delay, then increasing weight.
Parameters:
delay: Time before weights increasew_max: Maximum weight cap
Formula:
w(t) = min(w_max, S(min(t, τ*))^(-1))
When to Use:
- Known delay in treatment effect
- Clear scientific rationale for delay period
simtrial Implementation:
# 4-month delay, max weight 2
data |> wlr(weight = mb(delay = 4, w_max = 2))
# Unlimited weight growth
data |> wlr(weight = mb(delay = 6, w_max = Inf))
Early Zero Weights (Xu et al., 2017)
Design: Exactly zero weight for early period, then standard logrank.
When to Use:
- Want to completely ignore early period
- Regulatory acceptance of early exclusion
simtrial Implementation:
# Zero weight for first 6 months
data |> wlr(weight = early_zero(early_period = 6))
MaxCombo Test
Concept: Combine multiple weighted logrank tests, take maximum Z-score.
Advantages:
- Robust across NPH patterns
- Maintains power under uncertainty
- Single pre-specified p-value
Common Combinations:
| Combo | Tests | Use Case | |-------|-------|----------| | 2-test | FH(0,0) + FH(0,1) | Unknown late effect | | 3-test | FH(0,0) + FH(0,0.5) + FH(0.5,0.5) | Comprehensive | | Custom | FH(0,0) + FH(0,1) + FH(1,1) | Maximum robustness |
simtrial Implementation:
# Two-test MaxCombo
data |> maxcombo(rho = c(0, 0), gamma = c(0, 1))
# Three-test MaxCombo
data |> maxcombo(rho = c(0, 0, 0.5), gamma = c(0, 0.5, 0.5))
Correlation Handling: MaxCombo accounts for correlation between tests using multivariate normal distribution.
Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST)
Definition: Area under survival curve up to time τ.
Formula:
RMST(τ) = ∫₀^τ S(t) dt
Advantages:
- Interpretable (expected survival time)
- Valid under non-PH
- No proportionality assumption
Considerations:
- Choice of τ is critical
- τ must be within follow-up
- Less powerful than logrank under PH
simtrial Implementation:
data |> rmst(tau = 24) # RMST at 24 months
Milestone Analysis
Definition: Compare survival probability at fixed time point.
Test Statistic:
Z = (S_trt(t*) - S_ctrl(t*)) / SE
Advantages:
- Easy to interpret
- Clinically meaningful time point
- Valid under non-PH
simtrial Implementation:
data |> milestone(ms_time = 12, test_type = "naive")
Non-Proportional Hazards Patterns
Delayed Treatment Effect
Pattern: HR = 1 initially, then HR 0 or MaxCombo
- Sensitivity: Standard logrank
- Alternative: RMST with appropriate τ
Simulation Setup:
fail_rate 0
2. Early milestone analysis
3. Consider if effect is clinically durable
### Cure Model
**Pattern:** Proportion of patients cured (never event)
**Analysis Recommendations:**
1. Standard logrank often adequate
2. Long-term milestone helpful
3. Consider cure fraction estimation
## Method Selection Algorithm
START │ ├─ Is proportional hazards expected? │ ├─ Yes → Standard logrank FH(0,0) │ └─ No → Continue │ ├─ Is delayed effect expected? │ ├─ Yes, delay known → MB weights │ ├─ Yes, delay uncertain → FH(0, 0.5) or MaxCombo │ └─ No → Continue │ ├─ Is crossing possible? │ ├─ Yes → RMST or FH(0.5, 0.5) │ └─ No → Continue │ ├─ Maximum robustness needed? │ ├─ Yes → MaxCombo │ └─ No → FH(0, γ) based on expected pattern │ END
## Power Comparison Under Different Scenarios
### Proportional Hazards (HR = 0.7)
| Method | Relative Power |
|--------|---------------|
| Logrank FH(0,0) | 100% (optimal) |
| FH(0, 0.5) | ~95% |
| MaxCombo | ~98% |
| RMST | ~90% |
### Delayed Effect (3-month delay, HR = 0.6 after)
| Method | Relative Power |
|--------|---------------|
| Logrank FH(0,0) | 70% |
| FH(0, 0.5) | 90% |
| MB(delay=3) | 95% |
| MaxCombo | 92% |
### Crossing Hazards
| Method | Relative Power |
|--------|---------------|
| Logrank FH(0,0) | Variable |
| FH(0.5, 0.5) | Better |
| RMST | Depends on τ |
| MaxCombo | Robust |
## Practical Considerations
### Regulatory Acceptance
- FDA generally accepts weighted logrank with justification
- Pre-specification is critical
- MaxCombo gaining acceptance
- RMST as sensitivity analysis
### Pre-specification Requirements
1. Analysis method must be specified before unblinding
2. Weight parameters (ρ, γ) must be fixed
3. MaxCombo test components must be defined
4. τ for RMST must be justified
### Sample Size Implications
- Weighted tests may require larger sample under PH
- MaxCombo has slight efficiency loss
- Consider this in planning
## Best Practices
1. **Primary Analysis**: Choose method aligned with expected NPH pattern
2. **Sensitivity Analyses**: Include standard logrank and alternatives
3. **Justification**: Document scientific rationale for method choice
4. **Simulation**: Validate power across plausible scenarios
5. **Pre-specification**: Lock method before any data review
## Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- **Author:** [choxos](https://github.com/choxos)
- **Source:** [choxos/BiostatAgent](https://github.com/choxos/BiostatAgent)
- **License:** MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.