AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Work Brainstorm

skill-christopherlouet-claude-base-work-brainstorm · by christopherlouet

Structured ideation before specification. Transform a vague idea into a validated design via questioning and exploration of alternatives. Trigger when the user has a fuzzy idea, wants to explore approaches, or hesitates between several directions.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
42 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-christopherlouet-claude-base-work-brainstorm

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-christopherlouet-claude-base-work-brainstorm)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Work Brainstorm? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Structured Brainstorming

Goal

Transform a raw idea into an approved design BEFORE specifying or implementing. Ideation phase between "I have a vague idea" and "here are the user stories".

Vague idea → BRAINSTORM → Validated design → /work:work-specify → /work:work-plan → /dev:dev-tdd

Iron Rule

IMPORTANT: Do NOT invoke an implementation skill, write code, scaffold a project, or take any implementation action until the design has been presented AND approved by the user.

Process

1. Explore the context

Before proposing anything:

  • Read the relevant project files (architecture, existing code, CLAUDE.md)
  • Check recent changes (git log --oneline -10)
  • Identify existing technical constraints
  • Understand the "why" behind the idea

2. Clarify through questioning

Ask clarification questions one at a time (not a block of 10 questions).

| Question type | Example | |------------------|---------| | Goal | "What problem does this solve for the user?" | | Scope | "Should this work with X or is it independent?" | | Constraints | "Are there time, budget, or tech limits?" | | Users | "Who will use this? In what context?" | | Success | "How will we know it works well?" |

Stop questioning when there is enough context to propose alternatives.

3. Propose 2-3 approaches

For each approach, present:

### Approach A: [Descriptive name]

**Principle**: [1-2 sentences]

**Pros**:
- [Pro 1]
- [Pro 2]

**Cons**:
- [Con 1]
- [Con 2]

**Complexity**: [Low / Medium / High]

**Risks**:
- [Risk 1]

4. Challenge the approaches

After presenting the alternatives:

  • Apply YAGNI: "Do we really need X?"
  • Look for the simplest solution that works
  • Identify pieces that can be deferred (P2/P3)
  • Check that a solution does not already exist in the codebase or dependencies

5. Converge on a design

Once the user has chosen a direction:

  • Decompose the system into units with a single clear goal
  • Define the interfaces between units
  • Make sure each unit can be tested independently
  • Present section by section, asking for validation at each step

6. Document the design

Write the design in a file:

docs/designs/YYYY-MM-DD-[topic]-design.md

Format:

# Design: [Title]

**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Status**: Approved / Under discussion

## Context
[Why this design is needed]

## Decision
[Chosen approach and why]

## Alternatives considered
[Rejected approaches and why]

## Detailed design
[Breakdown into components, interfaces, flows]

## Identified risks
[Risks and mitigations]

## Out of scope
[What is NOT included in this design]

7. Self-review

Before presenting the final design, check:

  • [ ] No placeholders ("TBD", "to be defined", "TODO")
  • [ ] No contradictions between sections
  • [ ] No ambiguities (each term has a single interpretation)
  • [ ] YAGNI applied (no speculative features)
  • [ ] Each component is testable independently
  • [ ] Interfaces between components are explicit

8. Handoff

Once the design is approved, propose:

Design approved. Next steps:
1. `/work:work-specify` — Transform this design into testable user stories
2. `/work:work-plan` — Plan the technical implementation

Design principles

  • Decompose into units that each have a clear goal
  • Explicit interfaces between units
  • Independently testable: each unit can be tested alone
  • YAGNI: no speculative features, no premature generalization
  • Simplicity: the simplest solution that works is the best
  • Reversibility: prefer decisions that are easy to change

Expected output

## Brainstorm: [Title]

### Context
[What we have understood about the need]

### Approaches explored
| Approach | Strengths | Weaknesses | Complexity |
|----------|--------|------------|------------|
| A: [...] | [...] | [...] | Low |
| B: [...] | [...] | [...] | Medium |
| C: [...] | [...] | [...] | High |

### Decision
**Chosen approach**: [X]
**Reason**: [Why this approach]

### Design
[Breakdown, interfaces, flows]

### Next steps
1. `/work:work-specify` for the user stories
2. `/work:work-plan` for the technical plan

Related agents

| Before | Usage | |-------|-------| | /work:work-explore | Understand the technical context |

| After | Usage | |-------|-------| | /work:work-specify | User stories and acceptance criteria | | /work:work-plan | Technical implementation plan |

Rules

  • ALWAYS explore the context before proposing
  • ALWAYS propose at least 2 approaches with trade-offs
  • NEVER implement before explicit approval of the design
  • Ask clarification questions ONE AT A TIME
  • Apply YAGNI systematically
  • Document rejected alternatives (not just the chosen one)

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.