Install
$ agentstack add skill-citedy-adclaw-ads-landing ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Landing Page Quality for Ad Campaigns
Process
- Collect landing page URLs from active ad campaigns
- Read
ads-shared/references/benchmarks.mdfor conversion rate benchmarks - Read
ads-shared/references/conversion-tracking.mdfor pixel/tag verification - Assess each landing page for ad-specific quality factors
- Score landing pages and identify improvement opportunities
- Generate recommendations prioritized by conversion impact
Message Match Assessment
The #1 landing page issue in ad campaigns: does the page match the ad?
What to Check
- Headline match: landing page H1 reflects ad copy headline/keyword
- Offer match: promoted offer (price, discount, trial) is visible above fold
- CTA match: landing page CTA matches ad's promised action
- Visual match: consistent imagery between ad creative and page
- Keyword match: search keyword appears naturally in page content
Message Match Scoring
| Level | Description | Score | |-------|-------------|-------| | Exact match | Headline, offer, CTA all align perfectly | 100% | | Partial match | Headline matches but offer/CTA differs | 60% | | Weak match | Generic page, loosely related to ad | 30% | | Mismatch | Page content doesn't reflect ad promise | 0% |
Page Speed Assessment
Slow pages kill conversion rates. For every 1s delay, CVR drops ~7%.
Thresholds (Ad Landing Pages)
| Metric | Pass | Warning | Fail | |--------|------|---------|------| | LCP | 4.0s | | FID/INP | 200ms | | CLS | 0.25 | | Time to Interactive | 5.0s | | Page weight | 5MB |
Common Speed Issues in Ad Pages
- Hero images not compressed (use WebP/AVIF)
- Too many third-party scripts (chat widgets, analytics, heatmaps)
- Render-blocking CSS/JS above fold
- No lazy loading for below-fold content
- Font files not preloaded
Mobile Experience
75%+ of ad clicks come from mobile. Mobile experience is critical.
Mobile Checklist
- Tap targets: ≥48x48px with ≥8px spacing
- Font size: ≥16px body text (no pinch-to-zoom needed)
- Form fields: properly sized, keyboard type matches input (email, phone, number)
- CTA button: full-width on mobile, visible without scrolling
- No horizontal scroll
- Images responsive and properly sized
- Phone number clickable (tel: link)
- No interstitials or popups blocking content on load
Trust Signals
Above-the-Fold Trust Elements
- Company logo visible
- Social proof (customer count, reviews, ratings)
- Security badges (SSL, payment security, guarantees)
- Recognizable client logos (B2B)
- Star ratings or testimonial snippet
Below-the-Fold Trust Elements
- Full testimonials with names, photos, companies
- Case study highlights with specific metrics
- Certifications, awards, accreditations
- Privacy policy link
- Physical address/phone number (local service businesses)
Form Optimization
Form Length Impact on CVR
| Fields | Expected CVR Impact | Use Case | |--------|-------------------|----------| | 1-3 fields | Highest CVR | Top-of-funnel, free offer | | 4-5 fields | Moderate CVR | Mid-funnel, qualified leads | | 6-8 fields | Lower CVR | Bottom-funnel, sales-ready | | 9+ fields | Lowest CVR | Only for high-value offers |
Form Best Practices
- Pre-fill fields where possible (UTM data, known info)
- Use multi-step forms for 5+ fields (progressive disclosure)
- Show progress indicator on multi-step forms
- Inline validation (don't wait until submit to show errors)
- Error messages are clear and helpful
- Submit button text is specific ("Get My Free Quote" not "Submit")
- Thank you page has clear next steps
Ad-Specific Landing Page Elements
UTM Parameter Handling
- UTM parameters captured and stored (for attribution)
- Click IDs preserved: gclid (Google), fbclid (Meta), ttclid (TikTok), msclkid (Microsoft)
- Parameters passed to form submissions or CRM
Dynamic Content
- Dynamic keyword insertion in headline (Google Ads feature)
- Location-specific content for geo-targeted campaigns
- Audience-specific messaging (different pages for different segments)
- A/B testing active on key elements (headline, CTA, hero image)
Conversion Tracking
- Thank you page/event fires correctly for all platforms
- Form submission triggers conversion event
- Phone call tracking configured (if applicable)
- Chat/live agent triggers tracked as micro-conversions
Landing Page Quality by Platform
| Platform | Key Requirement | Notes | |----------|----------------|-------| | Google | QS component: landing page experience | Directly affects ad rank and CPC | | Meta | Page load speed critical | Slow pages = Meta penalizes delivery | | LinkedIn | Professional, B2B appropriate | Match LinkedIn's professional context | | TikTok | Mobile-first mandatory | 95%+ TikTok traffic is mobile | | Microsoft | Desktop-optimized matters more | Higher desktop % than other platforms |
Output
Landing Page Assessment
Landing Page Health
Message Match: ████████░░ XX/100
Page Speed: ██████████ XX/100
Mobile: ███████░░░ XX/100
Trust Signals: █████░░░░░ XX/100
Form Quality: ████████░░ XX/100
Deliverables
LANDING-PAGE-REPORT.md: Per-page assessment with scores- Message match analysis per ad-to-page combination
- Page speed improvement priorities
- Mobile experience fixes
- Form optimization recommendations
- Quick Wins sorted by conversion impact
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: citedy
- Source: citedy/adclaw
- License: Apache-2.0
- Homepage: https://pypi.org/project/adclaw/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.