AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Pmstudio Irp

skill-coco-research-coco-irp · by coco-research

Generate an Incident Response Plan (IRP) with severity classification, escalation procedures, and communication templates. Use when someone asks to "create an incident response plan", "IRP", "incident procedures", "escalation matrix", "incident playbook", or needs to document how to handle incidents for a product/platform. Reads PRD, stakeholder directory, and project memory to build product-spec…

No reviews yet
0 installs
41 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-coco-research-coco-irp

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-coco-research-coco-irp)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Pmstudio Irp? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

IRP — Incident Response Plan

Purpose

Generates an Incident Response Plan specific to the product/platform. Not a generic IT incident template — this plan is scoped to the product, uses its real stakeholders as escalation contacts, and ties severity to its data classification.

Process

Step 1: Read Context

Read all that exist:

  • CLAUDE.local.md — architecture, stakeholders, vendor contacts, data classification
  • PRD/*.html or PRD/*.md — security section, RBAC, NFRs, integrations
  • Data/Stakeholder-Directory.* — escalation contacts with roles and emails
  • Operational/DR-Plan*.html — recovery procedures to reference (if exists)

Step 2: Ask Discovery Questions

Only ask what can't be inferred:

  1. What constitutes an "incident" for this product? (data breach, service outage, unauthorized access, integration failure, data corruption)
  2. Who is the Incident Commander? (default: PM, but confirm)
  3. Vendor support model? (SLA response times, escalation contacts, ticket system)
  4. Legal/privilege considerations? (e.g., ProductB has legal privilege — incidents may require legal counsel)
  5. Existing Coco Inc incident process? (does the team already report through ServiceNow, Slack, etc.)

Step 3: Generate IRP Document

Output: Operational/IRP-{ProductName}-{Date}.html

Self-contained HTML with print-optimized CSS. No CDN dependencies — this document must work offline during an actual incident.

12 sections:

1. Purpose & Scope

  • Which product/instance this plan covers
  • What qualifies as an incident vs. a support request
  • Relationship to firm-wide incident process

2. Severity Classification

Build product-specific severity matrix. See references/severity-matrix.md for the framework.

Key rule: Data classification drives minimum severity.

  • Purple Data incident = auto-SEV1
  • Red Data incident = minimum SEV2
  • Yellow/Green = severity based on impact

| Severity | Definition | Response Time | Example | |----------|-----------|---------------|---------| | SEV1 — Critical | Data breach, complete service outage, legal/regulatory exposure | 15 min | Purple Data accessed by unauthorized user | | SEV2 — High | Significant functionality loss, data integrity issue, >50% users affected | 1 hour | Integration failure causing data sync halt | | SEV3 — Medium | Partial functionality loss, workaround available, <50% users affected | 4 hours | Single module unavailable, manual process possible | | SEV4 — Low | Minor issue, cosmetic, single-user impact | Next business day | Report formatting error, UI glitch |

3. Detection & Reporting

  • How incidents are typically detected (user report, monitoring, vendor notification)
  • Reporting channel (email, Slack, ServiceNow ticket)
  • What information to include when reporting

4. Escalation Matrix

  • Per-severity: who to contact, in what order, with backup contacts
  • Pull real names and emails from stakeholder directory
  • Include vendor escalation path

5. Response Procedures

  • Per-severity playbooks with triage, containment, investigation, resolution steps
  • See references/escalation-patterns.md for playbook structure

6. Communication Protocol

  • Internal (team Slack/Teams channel)
  • Stakeholder (email using /stakeholder-comms incident template)
  • Vendor (support ticket + phone for SEV1-2)
  • Leadership (when to escalate to SteerCo)
  • Per-severity: who communicates what, when, through which channel

7. Evidence Preservation

  • What to capture: screenshots, logs, timestamps, affected records
  • Where to store: incident folder in SharePoint, not in the product itself
  • Chain of custody for legal/privilege incidents

8. Resolution & Recovery

  • Handoff to DR/Recovery plan (if exists)
  • Verification steps before declaring resolved
  • Service restoration confirmation checklist

9. Post-Incident Review (PIR)

  • PIR meeting within 48 hours of resolution
  • Template: timeline, impact, root cause, contributing factors, what went well, what to improve, action items
  • PIR document stored in Meeting-Notes/PIR-{Date}-{Summary}.md

10. Roles & Responsibilities

  • Incident Commander (owns coordination)
  • Communications Lead (owns stakeholder updates)
  • Technical Lead (owns diagnosis and fix)
  • Vendor Liaison (owns vendor communication)
  • Legal Counsel (for privilege/regulatory incidents)

11. Vendor Escalation

  • Vendor support tiers and SLA response times
  • Escalation contacts (from project memory)
  • Ticket creation procedure
  • When to bypass normal support (SEV1 phone escalation)

12. Review & Maintenance

  • Review cadence: semi-annually or after any SEV1-2 incident
  • Tabletop exercise schedule: annually
  • Contact list verification: quarterly
  • Version history

Step 4: Present for Review

Show the complete plan structure with key content decisions highlighted:

  • Severity matrix with product-specific examples
  • Escalation matrix with real names
  • Any assumptions made

Ask for approval before writing the file.

Critical Rules

  1. Zero external dependencies. The HTML must render fully offline. No CDN links. During an incident, internet may be unreliable.
  2. Real contacts only. Pull names/emails from project files. Leave blanks with "[TBD — add contact]" markers rather than guessing.
  3. Legal privilege awareness. If the project involves legal privilege (like ProductB/Tax), include a section on when to involve legal counsel and how to protect privilege during incident response.
  4. Severity ties to data. Always tie severity classification to the product's data classification. Don't create a severity matrix that ignores data sensitivity.
  5. Actionable, not aspirational. Every procedure should be something the team can actually execute today with current tools and access. Don't include monitoring procedures if no monitoring exists yet.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.