AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Coding Standard Writer

skill-cogni-ai-ou-cogni-ai-agent-skills-coding-standard-writer · by Cogni-AI-OU

Write a coding standards document for a project using the coding styles inferred from provided file(s) or folder(s).

— No reviews yet
0 installs
31 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-cogni-ai-ou-cogni-ai-agent-skills-coding-standard-writer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-cogni-ai-ou-cogni-ai-agent-skills-coding-standard-writer)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
○ 4mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Coding Standard Writer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Skill Name: coding-standard-writer

Dynamically generate a coding standards document based on the existing syntax, formatting, and conventions found in provided file(s) or folder(s).

Core Process

  1. Ingest Targets: Read the contents of the target ` or `.
  2. Analyze Syntax: Parse indentation, variable naming (camelCase, snake_case), commenting styles, block nesting, and string quotation formats.
  3. Identify Majority Rules: Tally occurrences of different styles; establish the majority as the standard.
  4. Handle Inconsistencies: Report formatting inconsistencies and optionally fix them only when explicitly requested by the user; always verify changes using project-specific linting tools.
  5. Format Document: Use a "minimal" or "verbose" template structure to compose the guidelines.
  6. Output Generation: Write the result to a new file (e.g., CONTRIBUTING.md, STYLE.md) or inject it into the README.md.

Core Principles

  • Empirical Inference: Standards must be derived strictly from existing code, not assumed.
  • Template Adaptation: Use "verbose" for comprehensive style guides and "minimal" for concise rule summaries.
  • Contextual Insertion: When appending to README.md, locate the most logical insertion point (e.g., at the end or under a "Contributing" heading).

When to Use

  • When tasked with creating coding guidelines from existing code.
  • To detect and fix formatting inconsistencies across multiple files.
  • When generating CONTRIBUTING.md, STYLE.md, or STYLEGUIDE.md.

When Not to Use

  • When the project already has an explicit, well-documented CONTRIBUTING.md or .editorconfig that should not be overwritten.
  • To enforce rules that contradict the organization's global engineering standards.
  • When generating general project documentation unrelated to coding style (use docs-writer).

Common Pitfalls

  • Ignoring Edge Cases: Establishing a "majority rule" based on a single small file, leading to a standard that conflicts with the rest of the massive codebase.
  • Overwriting Existing Rules: Blindly generating a new STYLE.md that overrides a carefully curated, existing style guide without asking the user.
  • Opinionated Hallucinations: Injecting Python conventions (like PEP 8) into a JavaScript project just because the LLM prefers them, rather than strictly empirical inference.

Quick Start

  1. Identify the reference file or folder.
  2. Read the source contents to infer formatting patterns.
  3. Generate the coding standard using a minimal or verbose markdown template.
  4. Write to the designated output location.

Diagnostics and Troubleshooting

  • If file styles are extremely chaotic, prompt the user to choose a baseline reference file before generating the standard.

Best Practices

  • Fetch external style guides as supplemental reference only when explicitly requested, and do not let them override the codebase's existing majority conventions.
  • If requested, generate a companion test file to enforce the newly defined standards.

What to Avoid

  • Overwriting existing documented standards without confirmation.
  • Injecting subjective preferences that contradict the codebase's existing majority style.

Coding Standards Templates

"m", "minimal"

    ```markdown
    ## 1. Introduction
    *   **Purpose:** Briefly explain why the coding standards are being established (e.g., to improve code quality, maintainability, and team collaboration).
    *   **Scope:** Define which languages, projects, or modules this specification applies to.

    ## 2. Naming Conventions
    *   **Variables:** `camelCase`
    *   **Functions/Methods:** `PascalCase` or `camelCase`.
    *   **Classes/Structs:** `PascalCase`.
    *   **Constants:** `UPPER_SNAKE_CASE`.

    ## 3. Formatting and Style
    *   **Indentation:** Use 4 spaces per indent (or tabs).
    *   **Line Length:** Limit lines to a maximum of 80 or 120 characters.
    *   **Braces:** Use the "K&R" style (opening brace on the same line) or the "Allman" style (opening brace on a new line).
    *   **Blank Lines:** Specify how many blank lines to use for separating logical blocks of code.

    ## 4. Commenting
    *   **Docstrings/Function Comments:** Describe the function's purpose, parameters, and return values.
    *   **Inline Comments:** Explain complex or non-obvious logic.
    *   **File Headers:** Specify what information should be included in a file header, such as author, date, and file description.

    ## 5. Error Handling
    *   **General:** How to handle and log errors.
    *   **Specifics:** Which exception types to use, and what information to include in error messages.

    ## 6. Best Practices and Anti-Patterns
    *   **General:** List common anti-patterns to avoid (e.g., global variables, magic numbers).
    *   **Language-specific:** Specific recommendations based on the project's programming language.

    ## 7. Examples
    *   Provide a small code example demonstrating the correct application of the rules.
    *   Provide a small code example of an incorrect implementation and how to fix it.

    ## 8. Contribution and Enforcement
    *   Explain how the standards are to be enforced (e.g., via code reviews).
    *   Provide a guide for contributing to the standards document itself.
    ```

"v", verbose"

    ```markdown

    # Style Guide

    This document defines the style and conventions used in this project.
    All contributions should follow these rules unless otherwise noted.

    ## 1. General Code Style

    - Favor clarity over brevity.
    - Keep functions and methods small and focused.
    - Avoid repeating logic; prefer shared helpers/utilities.
    - Remove unused variables, imports, code paths, and files.

    ## 2. Naming Conventions

    Use descriptive names. Avoid abbreviations unless well-known.

    | Item            | Convention           | Example            |
    |-----------------|----------------------|--------------------|
    | Variables       | `lower_snake_case`   | `buffer_size`      |
    | Functions       | `lower_snake_case()` | `read_file()`      |
    | Constants       | `UPPER_SNAKE_CASE`   | `MAX_RETRIES`      |
    | Types/Structs   | `PascalCase`         | `FileHeader`       |
    | File Names      | `lower_snake_case`   | `file_reader.c`    |

    ## 3. Formatting Rules

    - Indentation: **4 spaces**
    - Line length: **max 100 characters**
    - Encoding: **UTF-8**, no BOM
    - End files with a newline

    ### Braces (example in C, adjust for your language)

        ```c
        if (condition) {
            do_something();
        } else {
            do_something_else();
        }
        ```

    ### Spacing

    - One space after keywords: `if (x)`, not `if(x)`
    - One blank line between top-level functions

    ## 4. Comments & Documentation

    - Explain *why*, not *what*, unless intent is unclear.
    - Keep comments up-to-date as code changes.
    - Public functions should include a short description of purpose and parameters.

    Recommended tags:

        ```text
        TODO: follow-up work
        FIXME: known incorrect behavior
        NOTE: non-obvious design decision
        ```

    ## 5. Error Handling

    - Handle error conditions explicitly.
    - Avoid silent failures; either return errors or log them appropriately.
    - Clean up resources (files, memory, handles) before returning on failure.

    ## 6. Commit & Review Practices

    ### Commits
    - One logical change per commit.
    - Write clear commit messages:

        ```text
        Short summary (max ~50 chars)
        Optional longer explanation of context and rationale.
        ```

    ### Reviews
    - Keep pull requests reasonably small.
    - Be respectful and constructive in review discussions.
    - Address requested changes or explain if you disagree.

    ## 7. Tests

    - Write tests for new functionality.
    - Tests should be deterministic (no randomness without seeding).
    - Prefer readable test cases over complex test abstraction.

    ## 8. Changes to This Guide

    Style evolves.
    Propose improvements by opening an issue or sending a patch updating this document.
    ```

References

Related Skills

  • docs-writer: You MUST load this skill when writing or updating READMEs and Architectural Decision Records.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.