Install
$ agentstack add skill-comet-ml-opik-claude-code-plugin-agent-ops ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Agent Operations: Build, Evaluate, and Monitor AI Agents
This skill covers the agent lifecycle beyond basic tracing: architecture patterns, evaluation, metrics, and production monitoring. All examples use Opik for observability — for SDK details (tracing, integrations, span types), load the opik skill.
The Agent Lifecycle
- Instrument — Add Opik tracing to make your agent's behavior visible (see
opikskill) - Evaluate — Measure performance with datasets, metrics, and experiments
- Monitor — Track quality, cost, and reliability in production
- Optimize — Improve based on data from evaluation and production traces
Agent Architecture Patterns
Trace every component of your agent with appropriate span types:
import opik
@opik.track(name="research_agent")
def agent(query: str) -> str:
plan = plan_action(query) # general span
results = execute_tool(plan) # tool span
return generate_response(results) # llm span
@opik.track(type="tool")
def execute_tool(action: dict) -> str:
return search_web(action["query"])
@opik.track(type="llm")
def generate_response(context: str) -> str:
return llm_call(context)
What to Trace
| Component | Span Type | Key Data | |-----------|-----------|----------| | Planning | general | Reasoning steps, decisions | | Tool calls | tool | Tool name, parameters, results | | LLM calls | llm | Prompt, response, tokens | | Retrieval | tool | Query, documents | | Validation | guardrail | Check results, pass/fail |
Evaluation
Evaluate agents at multiple levels — end-to-end and per-component:
from opik.evaluation import evaluate
from opik.evaluation.metrics import AnswerRelevance, Hallucination, AgentTaskCompletion
results = evaluate(
experiment_name="agent-v2",
dataset=dataset,
task=lambda item: {"output": agent(item["input"])},
scoring_metrics=[
AnswerRelevance(),
Hallucination(),
AgentTaskCompletion(),
]
)
Built-in Agent Metrics
| Metric | What It Measures | |--------|-----------------| | AgentTaskCompletion | Did the agent fulfill its task? | | AgentToolCorrectness | Were tools used correctly? | | TrajectoryAccuracy | Did actions match expected sequence? | | AnswerRelevance | Does the answer address the question? | | Hallucination | Are there unsupported claims? |
41 Total Built-in Metrics
Heuristic (Equals, Contains, BLEU, ROUGE, BERTScore, IsJson, etc.), LLM-as-Judge (AnswerRelevance, Hallucination, Usefulness, GEval, etc.), RAG (ContextPrecision, ContextRecall, Faithfulness), and conversation metrics. See references/evaluation.md for the full list.
Production Monitoring
- Dashboards — Visualize quality, cost, latency, and error trends
- Online evaluation — Automatically score production traces with LLM-as-Judge
- Alerts — Get notified when metrics deviate (quality drops, cost spikes, error rates)
- Guardrails — PII detection, topic validation, custom safety checks
- Opik Assist — AI-powered root cause analysis for failed traces
Common Anti-Patterns
| Category | Anti-Pattern | |----------|-------------| | Reliability | Unbounded loops, retry storms, silent failures | | Security | Prompt injection, privilege escalation, data leakage | | Observability | Late tracing (missing input), orphaned spans | | Tools | Tool loops, hallucinated tools, parameter errors |
Detailed References
| Topic | Reference File | |-------|----------------| | Agent architecture, reliability, security patterns | references/agent-patterns.md | | Evaluation datasets, experiments, all 41 metrics | references/evaluation.md | | Production dashboards, alerts, guardrails, cost tracking | references/production.md |
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: comet-ml
- Source: comet-ml/opik-claude-code-plugin
- License: Apache-2.0
- Homepage: https://www.comet.com/site/products/opik/
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.