Install
$ agentstack add skill-cosmicstack-labs-mercury-agent-skills-agent-health-monitoring ✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
Verified badge
Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.
Reliability & compatibility
Declared compatibility
Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.
We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.
How agent discovery & health will work →About
Agent Health Monitoring & Alerting
Overview
Production multi-agent systems fail silently. An agent that stops responding, returns empty results, or enters an infinite loop can degrade an entire workflow without triggering traditional infrastructure alerts. This skill covers how to build comprehensive health monitoring, metrics collection, and alerting for AI agent fleets.
Core Concepts
Agent Vital Signs
| Metric | What It Measures | Why It Matters | |--------|-----------------|----------------| | Response Rate | % of agent invocations that return a result | Dropping rate indicates crashes or context overflows | | Latency (P50/P95/P99) | Time from invocation to response | Spikes indicate context bloat or degraded model performance | | Error Rate | % of invocations with errors/tool failures | Rising rate indicates systemic issues | | Step Count | Number of reasoning steps per task | Unbounded growth indicates looping behavior | | Tool Call Success Rate | % of tool calls that succeed | Drop indicates broken integrations or rate limiting | | Token Consumption | Tokens used per agent run | Budget anomalies indicate runaway agents | | Context Utilization | % of context window used | High utilization risks truncation and quality loss | | Hallucination Score | Confidence calibration or factuality checks | Degrading accuracy undermines trust |
Alert Severity Levels
| Level | Color | Response Time | Examples | |-------|-------|---------------|----------| | P0 (Critical) | 🔴 Red | 20%, latency 5x baseline | | P2 (Medium) | 🟡 Yellow | 5%, slow degradation | | P3 (Low) | 🔵 Blue | str: starttime = time.time() stepcount = 0 token_usage = 0
try: result = await self.agent.run(task)
# Collect metrics duration = time.time() - starttime self.metrics.timing(f"agent.{self.agentname}.latency", duration) self.metrics.increment(f"agent.{self.agentname}.invocations") self.metrics.increment(f"agent.{self.agentname}.success") self.metrics.gauge(f"agent.{self.agentname}.steps", stepcount)
return result
except Exception as e: duration = time.time() - starttime self.metrics.increment(f"agent.{self.agentname}.errors") self.metrics.timing(f"agent.{self.agentname}.errorlatency", duration) raise
### Step 2: Implement Liveness & Readiness Probes
```python
class AgentHealthProbe:
"""Kubernetes-style health probes for AI agents."""
async def liveness_check(self, agent) -> bool:
"""Is the agent process alive and responding?"""
try:
result = await asyncio.wait_for(
agent.run("Respond with: OK"),
timeout=5.0
)
return "OK" in result
except (asyncio.TimeoutError, Exception):
return False
async def readiness_check(self, agent) -> dict:
"""Is the agent ready to accept tasks?"""
checks = {
"model_available": await self._check_model(agent),
"tools_available": await self._check_tools(agent),
"memory_available": await self._check_memory(agent),
"context_capacity": await self._check_context(agent),
}
return {
"ready": all(checks.values()),
"checks": checks
}
async def deep_check(self, agent) -> dict:
"""Full diagnostic: run a test task and validate output."""
test_task = agent.config.test_prompt
result = await agent.run(test_task)
return {
"passed": self._validate_output(result),
"output_preview": result[:200],
"latency_ms": self._last_latency
}
Step 3: Set Up Anomaly Detection
class AnomalyDetector:
"""Detect unusual agent behavior using statistical methods."""
def __init__(self, window_size: int = 100):
self.window_size = window_size
self.metrics_history = defaultdict(list)
def record(self, agent_name: str, metric: str, value: float):
self.metrics_history[f"{agent_name}:{metric}"].append(value)
# Keep rolling window
history = self.metrics_history[f"{agent_name}:{metric}"]
if len(history) > self.window_size:
history.pop(0)
def is_anomalous(self, agent_name: str, metric: str, value: float,
z_threshold: float = 3.0) -> tuple[bool, float]:
"""Check if a value is anomalous using z-score."""
history = self.metrics_history.get(f"{agent_name}:{metric}", [])
if len(history) z_threshold, z_score
Step 4: Build the Alerting Pipeline
class AlertManager:
"""Route alerts to the right channels based on severity."""
def __init__(self):
self.channels = {
"p0": ["pagerduty", "slack-critical", "phone"],
"p1": ["slack-critical", "email"],
"p2": ["slack-warn", "email"],
"p3": ["dashboard", "weekly-report"],
}
async def alert(self, severity: str, title: str, message: str,
context: dict = None):
"""Send an alert through the appropriate channels."""
channels = self.channels.get(severity, self.channels["p3"])
for channel in channels:
await self._send(channel, {
"severity": severity,
"title": title,
"message": message,
"context": context,
"timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat()
})
Step 5: Define Alert Rules
# alert-rules.yaml
rules:
- name: agent_down
condition: liveness_check == false
for: 30s
severity: P0
message: "Agent {name} is unresponsive"
- name: high_error_rate
condition: error_rate > 0.20
for: 5m
severity: P1
message: "Agent {name} error rate is {error_rate:.0%}"
- name: latency_spike
condition: p99_latency > 30s
for: 3m
severity: P1
message: "Agent {name} p99 latency is {latency:.1f}s"
- name: looping_detected
condition: step_count > max_steps * 0.8
for: 1m
severity: P2
message: "Agent {name} approaching step limit on {task_count} tasks"
- name: budget_anomaly
condition: token_usage > daily_budget * 0.5
for: 1h
severity: P2
message: "Agent {name} used {usage} tokens in last hour (50% of daily budget)"
Step 6: Build the Dashboard
Essential dashboard panels for a multi-agent system:
| Panel | Metric | Display | |-------|--------|---------| | Agent Grid | Liveness per agent | Green/Red status cards | | Latency Heatmap | P50/P95/P99 per agent | Color-coded time series | | Error Waterfall | Error rate by agent + error type | Stacked area chart | | Token Burn Rate | Tokens/min per agent | Line chart with budget line | | Active Tasks | Tasks in-flight per agent | Gauge per agent | | Top Errors | Most frequent error messages | Ranked list with count | | Context Pressure | % context window used | Per-agent gauge cluster | | Alert Timeline | Alerts over past 24h | Event timeline |
Trigger Phrases
| Phrase | Action | |--------|--------| | "Check agent health" | Run liveness probes on all agents | | "Show me the dashboard" | Generate or link to monitoring dashboard | | "Why is agent X slow?" | Show latency breakdown for specific agent | | "Any anomalies?" | Run anomaly detection on recent metrics | | "Set up alert for..." | Create a new alert rule | | "Agent X is down" | Trigger incident response workflow | | "Run a health check" | Execute full liveness + readiness + deep check |
Production Runbook
Incident: Agent Unresponsive
- Check liveness probe — is the process running?
- Check model endpoint — is the LLM provider healthy?
- Check context window — has the agent exceeded its limit?
- Restart agent with fresh context
- If recurring, set up circuit breaker
Incident: Error Rate Spike
- Identify error type — tool failure, model error, or parsing issue?
- Check recent deploys — did a prompt or tool change?
- Rollback if a recent change correlates
- Check rate limits — are external APIs throttling?
- Scale out if traffic increased
Incident: Token Budget Spike
- Identify which agent(s) are consuming
- Check for looping — excessive step counts
- Review recent tasks — unusually long inputs?
- Implement budget caps per task
- Alert the team if pattern persists
Anti-Patterns
| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Fix | |-------------|-------------|-----| | Monitoring only liveness | Agent can be "alive" but useless | Add readiness + deep checks | | Same threshold for all agents | Different agents have different baselines | Per-agent dynamic thresholds | | No alert deduplication | Alert fatigue leads to ignored alerts | Group by fingerprint, rate-limit | | Fixing symptoms, not causes | Band-aid solutions mask root issues | Always capture root cause in alerts | | No dashboard | No shared visibility | Build and maintain a live dashboard |
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: cosmicstack-labs
- Source: cosmicstack-labs/mercury-agent-skills
- License: MIT
- Homepage: https://skills.mercuryagent.sh
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet, be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.