AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Claude Md

skill-costa-marcello-skillkit-claude-md · by costa-marcello

Manages CLAUDE.md files. Audits, reviews, improves, refactors, updates, and generates subdirectory context. Discovers all CLAUDE.md files, evaluates quality against research-backed criteria, generates improvement reports, applies targeted updates, syncs CLAUDE.md with current codebase state, restructures using progressive disclosure, and creates contextual CLAUDE.md files for directories that ben…

No reviews yet
0 installs
20 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-costa-marcello-skillkit-claude-md

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-costa-marcello-skillkit-claude-md)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
3mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Claude Md? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Claude MD

Complete CLAUDE.md management: Audit, Review, Improve, Refactor, Update, and Generate. Core insight: rules with reasoning outperform bare rules. Models generalize from "why" explanations.

Quick Reference

| Mode | When to Use | Output | |------|-------------|--------| | Audit | "Audit CLAUDE.md", "Check all my rule files" | Discovery + quality scores for all files | | Review | "Review my CLAUDE.md", "Check instruction quality" | Detailed quality report + improvement suggestions | | Improve | "Improve my rules", "Fix my CLAUDE.md" | Targeted updates with diffs | | Refactor | "Organize Claude config", "Split CLAUDE.md" | Restructured files with progressive disclosure | | Update | "Update CLAUDE.md", "Sync my rules", "Init project" | CLAUDE.md synced with current codebase state | | Generate | "Generate subdirectory context", "Create package CLAUDE.md files" | New CLAUDE.md files for directories that need context |

Mode Sequencing

Common workflow combinations:

| Sequence | When to Use | |----------|-------------| | Audit → Review → Improve | Full assessment → quality check → targeted fixes | | Audit → Generate | Gaps found in subdirectory coverage → create missing files | | Update → Review or Improve | Sync with codebase → then grade or fix quality | | Improve → Refactor | Fix content issues → restructure if still bloated |

Generate reuses Phase 1 discovery when Audit already ran in the same session.


Workflow Overview

Phase 1: Discovery

Find all CLAUDE.md files in the repository:

find . -name "CLAUDE.md" -o -name ".claude.md" -o -name ".claude.local.md" 2>/dev/null | head -50

File Types & Locations:

| Type | Location | Purpose | |------|----------|---------| | Project root | ./CLAUDE.md | Primary project context | | Local overrides | ./.claude.local.md | Personal/local settings (gitignored) | | Global defaults | ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md | User-wide defaults across all projects | | Package-specific | ./packages/*/CLAUDE.md | Module-level context in monorepos | | Subdirectory | Any nested location | Feature/domain-specific context | | Rules directory | ./.claude/rules/*.md | Auto-loaded detailed rules | | Reference docs | ./.claude/reference/*.md | Large docs (NOT auto-loaded) |

Note: Claude auto-discovers CLAUDE.md files in parent directories, making monorepo setups work automatically.

Phase 2: Quality Assessment

For each CLAUDE.md file, evaluate against the 100-point rubric.

Six Categories (100 points total):

| Category | Points | Core Check | |----------|--------|------------| | Commands/workflows | 12 | Build/test/deploy commands present | | Architecture clarity | 12 | Codebase structure clear | | Non-obvious patterns | 10 | Gotchas and quirks documented | | Conciseness | 8 | No verbose or obvious info | | Currency | 8 | Reflects current codebase | | Content Quality | 50 | Reasoning, actionability, format (5 sub-criteria) |

Quality Grades: A (90-100), B (70-89), C (50-69), D (30-49), F (0-29).

See [references/quality-criteria.md](references/quality-criteria.md) for the full rubric, sub-criteria point breakdown, and bad/good examples.

Audit mode summary output:

## CLAUDE.md Audit Summary

- Files found: 4
- Average score: 72/100 (Grade B)
- Files needing update: 2

| File | Score | Grade | Key Issue |
|------|-------|-------|-----------|
| ./CLAUDE.md | 88/100 | B | Missing gotchas section |
| .claude/rules/coding.md | 91/100 | A | No issues |
| packages/api/CLAUDE.md | 54/100 | C | No commands, vague patterns |
| packages/shared/CLAUDE.md | 56/100 | C | Rules lack reasoning |

Rule Quality Dimensions (for Review mode): 6 dimensions scored 0-3 — Reasoning, Specificity, Positive framing, Examples, Structure, Conflicts. Only rules/patterns/conventions get scored; factual sections (Context, Key Files, Architecture, Commands) are excluded. Full scoring table and "what needs reasoning vs what doesn't" examples in [references/quality-criteria.md](references/quality-criteria.md).

Phase 3: Quality Report Output

Output the quality report before making any updates.

Report Format:

## CLAUDE.md Quality Report

### Summary
- Files found: X | Average score: X/100 | Files needing update: X

### File-by-File Assessment

#### 1. ./CLAUDE.md (Project Root) — Score: XX/100 (Grade: X)

| Criterion | Score |
|-----------|-------|
| Commands/workflows | X/12 |
| Architecture clarity | X/12 |
| Non-obvious patterns | X/10 |
| Conciseness | X/8 |
| Currency | X/8 |
| Content Quality (5 sub-criteria) | X/50 |

**Issues:** [list specific problems]
**Recommended additions:** [list what should be added]

Phase 4: Issue Detection (Review Mode)

Check rules and patterns for: (not factual context sections)

| Issue Type | Detection | Example Problem | Applies To | |------------|-----------|-----------------|------------| | Missing reasoning | No "why", "because", explanation | "Never use any" (why?) | Rules, Patterns | | Vague instruction | Not actionable, no concrete guidance | "Write clean code" | Rules, Patterns | | Negative-only framing | "Don't", "Never", "Avoid" without positive alternative | "Don't hardcode URLs" | Rules only | | No examples | Abstract rule without concrete illustration | Complex patterns need examples | Complex rules | | Conflicts | Two rules that contradict | "Use Jest" + "Use Vitest" | All | | Redundant | Duplicates another rule | Same instruction in two places | All | | Obvious | Model does this without instruction | "Use correct syntax" | Rules | | Stale commands | Build commands that no longer work | Outdated paths or scripts | Commands | | Missing dependencies | Required tools not mentioned | Setup requirements omitted | Environment |

Do NOT flag as issues:

  • Context sections without "why" (factual descriptions don't need reasoning)
  • Key Files without explanations (file path + purpose is sufficient)
  • Architecture sections without justification (structure is factual)

Phase 5: Targeted Updates (Improve Mode)

After outputting the quality report, ask user for confirmation before updating.

Update Guidelines:

| Do | Skip | |----|------| | Propose discovered commands, gotchas, package relationships, working test approaches, config quirks | Restate what's obvious from code, generic best practices, one-off fixes, verbose explanations |

For each change, show: target file, the diff or quoted block, and a brief "why". See [references/update-guidelines.md](references/update-guidelines.md) for the full add-vs-skip heuristics.

Diff Format:

### Update: ./CLAUDE.md

**Why:** Build command was missing, causing confusion about how to run the project.

```diff
+ ## Quick Start
+
+ ```bash
+ npm install
+ npm run dev  # Start development server on port 3000
+ ```

### Phase 6: Refactoring (Refactor Mode)

For bloated files, restructure using progressive disclosure.

**Triage Assessment:**

| Signal | Score |
|--------|-------|
| Already uses `.claude/rules/` structure | +2 |
| Has clear hierarchy (headers, tables) | +1 |
| Contains reasoning ("why" explanations) | +1 |
| Rules are actionable and specific | +1 |
| Under 200 lines with dense content | +1 |
| Over 300 lines | -1 |
| Wall-of-text without structure | -2 |
| Contains contradictions | -2 |
| Mix of vague and specific rules | -1 |

| Score | Action |
|-------|--------|
| 4+ | **Skip** — already well-organized |
| 2-3 | **Light** — extract verbose sections |
| 0-1 | **Standard** — full refactoring |
| Negative | **Deep** — significant restructuring |

**Refactor triage output:**

```markdown
## Triage: ./CLAUDE.md (380 lines)

| Signal | Score |
|--------|-------|
| Uses `.claude/rules/` | 0 |
| Clear hierarchy | +1 |
| Has reasoning | 0 |
| Actionable rules | +1 |
| Length | -1 (>300) |
| Wall-of-text | -2 |

**Total: -1 → Decision: Standard refactoring**

Plan: Extract coding rules to `.claude/rules/coding.md`, add reasoning to bare directives, move testing patterns to `.claude/rules/testing.md`.

Keep in root (high-value, frequently referenced):

| Category | Example | Why Keep | |----------|---------|----------| | Project description | "React dashboard for analytics" | Sets context for all tasks | | Commands | pnpm build, pnpm test | Used every session | | Hard rules with reasoning | "Never commit secrets — in git history forever" | Safety reinforcement | | Core principles (3-5) | "Type safety first", "Test behavior not implementation" | Philosophy that guides decisions | | Priority hierarchy | "Safety > Core Principles > Style" | Conflict resolution | | Critical @rules references | @rules/safety.md | Loads detailed content |

Extract to .claude/rules/ (detailed, topic-specific):

  • Detailed language conventions with examples
  • Extensive testing patterns
  • Framework-specific guidance
  • Comprehensive workflow documentation
  • Reference tables and checklists

Output structure:

project-root/
├── CLAUDE.md                     # High-value content with @references
└── .claude/
    ├── rules/                    # Auto-loaded by Claude Code
    │   ├── coding.md
    │   ├── testing.md
    │   ├── workflow.md
    │   └── safety.md
    └── reference/                # NOT auto-loaded (search-triggered)
        └── patterns.md

Phase 7: Apply Updates

After user approval, apply changes using the Edit tool. Preserve existing content structure.

Mode: Update (Sync CLAUDE.md with Codebase)

Triggers: "Update CLAUDE.md", "Sync my rules", "Init project", "Refresh project context"

Scans the codebase and updates CLAUDE.md to reflect the current project state. Creates a CLAUDE.md from scratch if none exists. Unlike Improve (which fixes quality issues), Update detects drift between the documented state and the actual codebase.

| Phase | Action | Detail | |-------|--------|--------| | U1 | Codebase Scan | Detect package manager, scripts/commands, directory structure, frameworks, config files, environment vars. | | U2 | Existing CLAUDE.md Read | Read current CLAUDE.md (if any). If none exists, treat all discovered info as new. | | U3 | Drift Detection | Compare documented state against discovered state. Flag stale commands, missing sections, outdated structure, removed files. | | U4 | Change Preview | Show additions, updates, and removals as a diff. Never auto-apply. | | U5 | User Approval | Present changes for approval. Support approve all, select specific, or cancel. | | U6 | Apply Updates | Write approved changes. Preserve existing reasoning, rules, and user-authored content. |

Key principle: Update adds and corrects factual content (commands, structure, files). It never removes or rewrites user-authored rules, reasoning, or principles unless they reference things that no longer exist.

See [references/update-workflow.md](references/update-workflow.md) for the full scanning algorithm, detection heuristics, and framework-specific patterns.

Update mode preview output:

## CLAUDE.md Update Preview

**Codebase scan results:** Node.js project, pnpm, Next.js 15, TypeScript

### Additions (new sections)
+ ## Commands
+ | `pnpm dev` | Start dev server |
+ | `pnpm build` | Production build |
+ | `pnpm test` | Run vitest |
+ | `pnpm lint` | ESLint check |

+ ## Architecture
+ src/app/        # Next.js app router pages
+ src/lib/        # Shared utilities
+ src/components/ # React components

### Updates (changed content)
~ ## Key Files
~ - `src/lib/db.ts` → renamed to `src/lib/database.ts`
~ - Removed reference to deleted `src/utils/legacy.ts`

### No changes
= ## Hard Rules (unchanged, user-authored)
= ## Core Principles (unchanged, user-authored)

Apply these changes? [All / Select / Cancel]

Mode: Generate (Create Subdirectory Context)

Triggers: "Generate subdirectory context", "Create CLAUDE.md for packages", "Add directory context files"

Workflow: Scan directories, score by "needs context" heuristics, generate minimal CLAUDE.md files for high-value directories, get user approval before creating any files.

| Phase | Action | Detail | |-------|--------|--------| | G1 | Directory Discovery | Scan structure, skip node_modules, dist, .git, etc. Reuse Audit discovery if already run. | | G2 | Directory Scoring | Score each directory (file count, entry points, naming clarity, monorepo signals). Threshold: >=6 full, 4-5 minimal, Generate mode preview output:

## Proposed Subdirectory CLAUDE.md Files

### 1. src/api/CLAUDE.md (Score: 7)
**Reason:** 23 files, has index.ts, API domain

**Content:**
# API Layer

@../CLAUDE.md

## Context
Express routes with Zod validation. All routes require auth middleware.

## Key Files
- `index.ts` - Route registration
- `middleware/auth.ts` - JWT validation

## Patterns
- One route file per resource — keeps routing predictable
- Validation schemas co-located with routes — easier to maintain

## Gotchas
- Rate limiting applies per-user, not per-IP

References

| File | Purpose | |------|---------| | references/rule-quality-standards.md | Hybrid format, transformation examples, positive reframing, preservation rules | | references/quality-criteria.md | 100-point scoring rubric and rule quality dimensions | | references/templates.md | CLAUDE.md templates for root, subfolder, monorepo, and rule files | | references/examples.md | Before/after refactoring transformations | | references/anti-patterns.md | Common mistakes to avoid when writing CLAUDE.md files | | references/execution-checklists.md | Mode-specific progress checklists (Audit, Review, Improve, Refactor, Update, Generate) | | references/update-workflow.md | Detailed Update mode scanning algorithm, detection heuristics, and framework patterns | | references/generation-workflow.md | Detailed Generate mode scoring algorithm and extraction heuristics | | references/subfolder-examples.md | Real-world subfolder CLAUDE.md examples | | references/update-guidelines.md | What to add vs what to skip when updating CLAUDE.md files |

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.