AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Commit Message

skill-crewforth-crewforth-commit-message · by crewforth

|

— No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
— view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-crewforth-crewforth-commit-message

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-crewforth-crewforth-commit-message)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● today

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Commit Message? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Commit Message (Conventional Commits v1.0.0)

Trigger phrases: "commit message", "make a commit", "conventional commit", "write a commit", "git commit"

Format: type(scope): summary + (optional blank line + body) + (optional footer).

The project decides the format and the language — read that FIRST

Conventional Commits below is the default, not a law. Before writing anything, read ./CLAUDE.md for a ## Conventions section (Commit language: / Commit format:). A declared format REPLACES the shape below — ticket-prefixed subjects, smart-commit trailers (#comment, #time), gitmoji, whatever the team runs on. A declared language replaces "the project's established language" guess. Nothing declared → the defaults here.

Whatever the request hands you verbatim — a ticket id, a #time 1d, a required prefix — goes into the message EXACTLY as given. Rewriting a literal someone typed is the worst failure this skill has: it looks correct and books the wrong number. If a literal contradicts the format, say so and ask; never silently adjust it. Same rule for the rest of the message: everything else is yours to word, the literals are not.

Type (required)

  • feat — new feature · fix — bug fix
  • docs — docs only · refactor — restructure with no behavior change
  • perf — performance · test — add/fix tests
  • build — build/dependency · ci — CI configuration
  • chore — maintenance/automated · revert — revert a previous commit
  • style — formatting (no logic)

Which type? (deciding when ambiguous)

  • A new capability for the user? → feat. Fixing an existing wrong behavior? → fix.
  • Behavior the same, only the structure changed? → refactor (if behavior changed it's feat/fix, not refactor).
  • Touched only tests/docs/formatting? → test/docs/style (don't touch code logic).

Scope (optional, preferred)

The affected area/module: auth, api, backend, db, frontend, session, agent, etc. One word, consistent with the project's module name.

Summary line

  • In the project's established language (English by default for open source), imperative/summary mood, start lowercase, NO period at the end, ≤ ~72 characters.
  • Say what it does, not how; avoid vague words ("fix", "update", "wip").

✅ feat(auth): one-time code TTL + brute-force limit ❌ fix: bug · ❌ update · ❌ changes

Body (optional — recommended for meaningful changes)

After a blank line: the WHY (motivation) + notable consequences/tradeoffs. Wrap at ~72 characters. Leave context for the future reader who opens git-blame — the diff already shows the "what"; you write the "why".

Footer (optional)

  • BREAKING CHANGE: — a backward-incompatible breaking change (triggers SemVer MAJOR, release skill).
  • Refs: # / Closes #.

Atomic commit — splitting a mixed diff

If a diff contains several logical changes, split it; don't cram it into one commit:

git add -p            # pick hunk by hunk; stage related changes separately
git add 

Each commit focused on a single topic; "feat + fix + refactor" doesn't belong in one commit.

Good / bad

Worked good-vs-bad commit examples: references/examples.md.

Rules

  • Atomic: one logical change = one commit.
  • No commit without DoD: don't propose a message until /simplify + tests green + (if SonarQube is used) sonarqube-check 0/0/0/0 pass.
  • If there is no staged diff, warn; ask the user about the git add scope with explicit options.
  • Don't run git commit silently; propose the message, wait for approval.

Prohibitions (absolute — see CLAUDE.md §4)

  • No AI trace: no co-author trailer, auto-generation footer, or robot emoji in the subject/body;

words naming an AI assistant, model, or coding tool, and the .claude name, do not appear in the message.

  • No vendor name: the third-party template/skeleton name and any "vendor copy / cleanup" disclosure are not written in the message (§4.2).
  • Human, natural language: the message is natural, technical, and in the project's established language (English by default for open source).
  • Approval: commit only when the user says "commit"; "done" is not approval (§4.4).
  • Destructive: amend / reset / force / --no-verify only on an explicit request; the hook is not skipped (§4.5).

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.