Api Design

API Design

A good API is a contract you can evolve without breaking the people who depend on it. Design the contract first, model resources not actions, use HTTP the way it is specified, stay backward-compatible, and make security and operability the default — not an afterthought.

This skill is protocol-agnostic at the workflow level; the canonical detail lives in references/ and is loaded on demand.

Read first (always)

List learnings/ and read every file whose name looks relevant to the current task — the project's versioning policy, its error envelope, its auth model, its naming conventions, and provider-specific webhook quirks live there and override the defaults in this file. If a learning conflicts with this SKILL.md, the learning wins — mention it to the user.

Tradeoff — when to apply, when to lighten up

Apply the full discipline for any API with external or cross-team consumers, or anything that persists state. Lighten the ceremony for a private, single-consumer endpoint you fully control on both sides and can change atomically — but never lighten the security floor (authorization, input validation, no secrets in URLs).

Workflow

1. Choose the protocol deliberately. REST for resource CRUD and broad client reach; GraphQL when clients need flexible, client-shaped queries over a graph; gRPC for low-latency internal service-to-service. Don't default to GraphQL/gRPC because they're new. State the choice and why.

→ verify: you can name the consumer and why this protocol fits it.

1. Design contract-first. Write the OpenAPI (or proto/SDL) spec before the code; review it, then generate or hand-write handlers against it. Lint the spec in CI (e.g. Spectral) so drift fails the build.

→ verify: the spec exists and is the source of truth, not reverse-engineered from code.

1. Model resources (nouns), not actions. A resource is a thing with an identity; collections are plural. Unusual operations become sub-resources or state, not verbs in the path. See references/rest-conventions.md.

→ verify: no verb in any path.

1. Use HTTP method + status-code semantics correctly. GET/HEAD safe and idempotent, PUT/DELETE idempotent, PATCH partial, POST creates/non-idempotent. Status code carries the outcome; the body carries the data or the error. See references/rest-conventions.md.

→ verify: no 200 OK with an error in the body.

1. Apply consistent conventions everywhere. One casing for paths, one for fields; pluralized collections; opaque IDs (don't leak DB sequence/structure). Inconsistency is a permanent tax on every consumer.

→ verify: a reader can predict the shape of an endpoint they haven't seen.

1. Never break consumers. Additive-only changes within a version; breaking changes need a new version and a deprecation window with Deprecation/Sunset headers. Adding pagination to a previously-unpaginated list is a breaking change. See references/versioning-and-compatibility.md.

→ verify: every change is classified additive or breaking before you ship it.

1. Standardize errors. Use RFC 9457 application/problem+json with a stable machine-readable code. HTTP status must match the body. Never leak stack traces. See references/errors-idempotency-concurrency.md.

→ verify: every error path returns the same envelope shape and a stable code.

1. Paginate every list from day one. Cursor-based (page_size + page_token / next link) preferred over offset. Retrofitting pagination later breaks clients.

→ verify: no unbounded list endpoint exists.

1. Make writes safe to retry. Idempotency-Key for non-idempotent POST (store and replay the first response); optimistic concurrency with ETag + If-Match → 412 on conflict. See references/errors-idempotency-concurrency.md.

→ verify: a client that retries a POST after a timeout cannot double-charge / double-create.

1. Security by default. TLS only; validate tokens server-side; per-object authorization (not just role); no secrets in URLs; validate input against the schema; rate-limit; CORS allow-list. See references/security.md.

→ verify: object-level authorization is checked on every request that names an object.

1. Capture a learning (final step). If you hit a convention, constraint, or trap not already in this file or references/, append a learnings/YYYY-MM-DD-slug.md. Otherwise skip.

Anti-patterns (reject on sight)

• Verbs in paths — POST /createUser, /getOrders. Use POST /users, GET /orders.
• 200 OK with an error in the body. The status code is the outcome; clients and proxies rely on it.
• Leaking internal/DB models — exposing column names, internal enums, sequence IDs, or join structure as the public shape. Map to a deliberate DTO.
• Chatty endpoints / N+1 — forcing clients to make many round-trips to assemble one view. Offer expansion (expand=) or a coarser resource.
• Breaking changes without a new version — including renaming/removing a field, changing a type or default, or adding pagination to a previously-unpaginated list.
• Inconsistent conventions — mixed casing, singular and plural collections, sometimes-wrapped responses.
• Non-idempotent POST with no idempotency key — any retry double-creates.
• Sensitive data in URLs — tokens, PII, secrets in path or query; they land in logs, history, and referers.
• Missing object-level authorization (BOLA) — checking authentication but not whether this caller may touch this object. OWASP API #1.
• Exposing stack traces — internal class names, file paths, SQL in the error body.
• Unbounded list endpoints — GET /events returning everything.

Capture a learning

When you finish, ask: did I encounter a convention, constraint, or trap that wasn't in this SKILL.md or references/? (A project-specific versioning policy, a non-standard error envelope the org has standardized on, a webhook provider's signing scheme, a mandated header.) If yes, append a learnings/YYYY-MM-DD-slug.md following learnings/README.md. If no, skip — don't write noise.

See also

• references/rest-conventions.md — resource modeling, naming, methods, status codes, pagination, filtering, caching.
• references/versioning-and-compatibility.md — versioning strategies, additive vs breaking changes, deprecation policy.
• references/errors-idempotency-concurrency.md — problem+json, idempotency keys, optimistic concurrency, retries, long-running ops, webhooks.
• references/security.md — TLS, OAuth2/OIDC, BOLA/BFLA, input validation, rate limiting, CORS, data exposure.
• developing-features skill — general production rules and the full security reference (the API surface is one boundary among several).
• reviewing-code skill — review a diff that changes an API surface.
• documenting-features skill — capture the API contract, ADRs, and the domain model alongside the code.
• learnings/ — project-specific API conventions accumulated over time.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

• Author: Cristhianzl
• Source: Cristhianzl/claude-skills-czl
• License: MIT

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.