AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Skill Reviewer

skill-cryptofish7-claude-skills-skill-reviewer · by cryptofish7

Audit installed skills and agents for bloat, overlap, and improvement opportunities. Use when the user wants to review, audit, list, or improve their skills and agents. Triggers on "review skills", "audit skills", "list skills", "skill review", "improve skills".

No reviews yet
0 installs
8 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-cryptofish7-claude-skills-skill-reviewer

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-cryptofish7-claude-skills-skill-reviewer)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
5mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Skill Reviewer? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Skill Reviewer

Inventory all installed skills and agents, then deep-review selected ones for conciseness, clarity, overlap, and token efficiency.

Workflow

Phase 1: Build inventory

Scan all skill and agent locations. For each item, count lines in the main file and any reference files.

Locations:

  • Global skills: ~/.claude/skills/*/SKILL.md + references/*.md
  • Global agents: ~/.claude/agents/*.md
  • Project skills: .claude/skills/*/SKILL.md + references/*.md
  • Project agents: .claude/agents/*.md

Build a table sorted by total lines (largest first):

| Scope   | Name             | Type  | Main Lines | Ref Lines | Total |
|---------|------------------|-------|------------|-----------|-------|
| global  | ci-cd-pipeline   | skill | 120        | 45        | 165   |
| project | bug-bash-update  | skill | 109        | 0         | 109   |
| global  | debugger         | agent | 98         | 0         | 98    |

Phase 2: Ask what to review

Present the table. Ask the user which items to deep-review. They can pick one, several, or "all".

Phase 3: Deep review

For each selected item, read the full content and analyze:

  1. Conciseness — Verbose sections, redundant instructions, unnecessary examples. Flag anything that could be shorter without losing meaning.
  2. Clarity — Ambiguous instructions, missing context, unclear phase transitions. Would another LLM session interpret this correctly?
  3. Scope overlap — Responsibilities duplicated with other skills/agents in the inventory. Note which items overlap and what to consolidate.
  4. Token efficiency — Estimate token count (words * 1.3). Flag sections that consume disproportionate tokens relative to their value.
  5. Structural consistency — Does it follow the same patterns (frontmatter, phases, guidelines) as other skills? Note deviations.

Phase 4: Present findings with rewrites

For each issue, show:

  • Current text (quoted)
  • Problem (one sentence)
  • Suggested rewrite (the improved version)

After presenting all findings, ask the user which changes to apply. Then apply the approved edits.

Guidelines

  • Be specific. "This section is verbose" is useless. "Lines 12-18 repeat the trigger list from the frontmatter" is actionable.
  • Preserve intent. Compress prose, don't change behavior.
  • Don't review this skill (skill-reviewer) unless explicitly asked.
  • When estimating tokens, use the rough formula: word count * 1.3.
  • If a skill has no issues worth flagging, say so briefly and move on.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.