AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Plan Smith

skill-ctx42-skills-plan-smith · by ctx42

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
12 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-ctx42-skills-plan-smith

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-ctx42-skills-plan-smith)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
24d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Plan Smith? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

plan-smith

Turn a brief into a tracked plan, and keep its status current. Pick the mode from the request:

  • Create — write a new plan from a description, a spec, or a shared

understanding reached with grill-me.

  • Update — re-read an existing plan and refresh each item's checkbox and status

from what has since happened.

If the request is ambiguous, ask one question: write a new plan or update an existing one?

Report tersely: no preamble or narration; state each fact once; after writing, don't paste the plan back — point to the file and give the status counts.

Format

Every plan is one Markdown file with two parts.

A summary table first, so status is visible at a glance:

## Summary

| #  | Item              | Status |
|----|-------------------|--------|
| 1  |  | Y      |
| 2  |  | N      |
| 3  |  | X      |

Legend: Y implemented · N not yet · X rejected

Keep the Item cell to a short name (≤ ~30 chars); the item's own section carries the detail. Align the table so the | delimiters line up vertically:

  • Each column's width is its widest cell's content.
  • Header and body cells: one leading and one trailing space around the content,

then pad the trailing side with spaces to the column width.

  • Separator row: fill each cell with dashes **flush to the pipes, no

surrounding spaces** (|----|, never | -- |), exactly as many dashes as the cell is wide.

Compute the widths from the widest cell — don't eyeball it — then verify the header, separator, and every body row have identical character width.

Then one section per item, numbered to match the table, each led by a checkbox:

## 1.  — [x]

## 3.  — [ ]  (X: rejected — )

Checkbox to status: [x] = Y (implemented), [ ] = N (not yet). A rejected item keeps [ ], is tagged X, and states why in one line — never delete it.

Create mode

  1. Gather the items. From the brief (or a grill-me summary), list the

distinct, independently-checkable pieces of work. Don't invent scope; ask if a piece is unclear.

  1. Order by dependency and impact — blocking and highest-impact items first.
  1. Write the file to the format above: summary table (every item starts N,

unchecked) then one section per item with acceptance criteria.

  1. Confirm the path before writing; use the name the user gives, else

tmp/-plan.md. Never overwrite an existing plan without saying so.

Update mode

  1. Read the existing plan. Take its item list and current statuses as ground

truth; never renumber or drop items.

  1. Set each item's new status from evidence the user gives or the repo shows:

implemented → [x] / Y; dropped → X + one-line reason; untouched → leave N.

  1. Rewrite the summary table and the changed items' checkboxes/tags only; leave

all other prose intact.

  1. Report the deltas and the new counts; don't reprint the whole plan.

Rules

  • One item = one independently-checkable outcome. Split bundled work.
  • Never silently drop a rejected item — mark it X with a reason so the record

stays honest.

  • Give each item acceptance criteria — state what proves it done, so Y is

verifiable, not asserted.

  • Table and sections stay in sync: same numbering, same statuses.
  • Keep summary Item names short and pad the table so columns align — a long

name in one row must not skew the | delimiters (see Format).

Self-learning

Read this skill's lessons and obey them: sibling LESSONS.md, else $HOME/.agent-data/ctx42-skills/lessons/craft/plan-smith.md when this directory is read-only. On a correction or self-caught mistake, append a one-line rule to whichever is writable (creating it) and report where.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.