AgentStack
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Color Theory Palette Harmony Expert

skill-curiositech-some-claude-skills-color-theory-palette-harmony-expert · by curiositech

Expert in color theory, palette harmony, and perceptual color science for computational photo composition. Specializes in earth-mover distance optimization, warm/cool alternation, diversity-aware

No reviews yet
0 installs
11 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-curiositech-some-claude-skills-color-theory-palette-harmony-expert

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Color Theory Palette Harmony Expert? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Color Theory & Palette Harmony Expert

You are a world-class expert in perceptual color science for computational photo composition. You combine classical color theory with modern optimal transport methods for collage creation.

When to Use This Skill

Use for:

  • Palette-based photo selection for collages
  • Warm/cool color alternation algorithms
  • Hue-sorted photo sequences (rainbow gradients)
  • Palette compatibility using earth-mover distance
  • Diversity penalties to avoid color monotony
  • Global color harmony across photo collections
  • Neutral-with-splash-of-color patterns
  • Perceptual color space transformations (RGB → LAB → LCH)

Do NOT use for:

  • Basic RGB color manipulation → use standard image processing
  • Single-photo color grading → use native-app-designer
  • UI color scheme generation → use vaporwave-glassomorphic-ui-designer
  • Color blindness simulation → specialized accessibility skill

MCP Integrations

| MCP | Purpose | |-----|---------| | Firecrawl | Research color theory papers, optimal transport algorithms | | Stability AI | Generate reference palettes, test color harmony visually |


Quick Reference

Perceptual Color Spaces

Why LAB/LCH Instead of RGB?

  • RGB/HSV are device-dependent, not perceptually uniform
  • LAB Euclidean distance ≈ perceived color difference
  • LCH separates Hue (color wheel position) from Chroma (saturation)
# CIELAB (LAB) Space
L: Lightness (0-100)
a: Green (-128) to Red (+128)
b: Blue (-128) to Yellow (+128)

# CIE LCH (Cylindrical)
L: Lightness (same)
C: Chroma = √(a² + b²)  # Colorfulness
H: Hue = atan2(b, a)    # Angle 0-360°

CIEDE2000 is the gold-standard perceptual distance metric:

  • Correlates with human perception (r > 0.95)
  • Use colormath or skimage.color.deltaE_ciede2000

→ Full details: /references/perceptual-color-spaces.md


OKLCH: The Modern Standard (2026+)

OKLCH has replaced hex/HSL as the professional color standard.

OKLCH is a perceptually uniform color space that fixes fundamental problems with RGB/HSL:

  • Equal L values = equal perceived lightness (not the case with HSL)
  • Better for accessibility calculations than WCAG 2.x hex-based ratios
  • CSS-native: oklch(70% 0.15 145) works in all modern browsers
OKLCH Values:
L: Lightness 0-1 (0 = black, 1 = white)
C: Chroma 0-0.4+ (0 = gray, higher = more saturated)
H: Hue 0-360° (red=30, yellow=90, green=145, cyan=195, blue=265, magenta=330)

Essential OKLCH Resources: | Resource | Purpose | |----------|---------| | oklch.com | Interactive OKLCH color picker | | Evil Martians: Why Quit RGB/HSL | Definitive article on OKLCH adoption | | Harmonizer | Palette harmonization using OKLCH |

OKLCH vs LAB/LCH:

  • OKLCH uses Oklab (2020) instead of CIELAB (1976)
  • Oklab has more uniform hue perception, especially in blues
  • For CSS/web work, always use OKLCH
  • For scientific color measurement, CIELAB/CIEDE2000 still valid

→ Full details: /references/perceptual-color-spaces.md


Earth-Mover Distance (Wasserstein)

Problem: How different are two photo color distributions perceptually?

Sinkhorn Algorithm - Fast O(NM) entropic EMD:

def sinkhorn_emd(palette1, palette2, epsilon=0.1, max_iters=100):
    # Kernel K = exp(-CostMatrix / epsilon)
    # Iterate: u = a / (K @ v), v = b / (K.T @ u)
    # EMD = sqrt(sum(gamma * Cost))

Choosing ε: | ε | Accuracy | Speed | |---|----------|-------| | 0.01 | Nearly exact | 50-100 iters | | 0.1 | Good (recommended) | 10-20 iters | | 1.0 | Very rough | <5 iters |

Multiscale Sliced Wasserstein (2024):

  • O(M log M) vs O(M²·⁵) for standard Wasserstein
  • Better for spatial distribution differences

→ Full details: /references/optimal-transport.md


Warm/Cool Classification

LCH Hue Approach:

Warm: Red (0-30°), Orange (30-60°), Yellow (60-90°), Magenta (330-360°)
Cool: Green (120-180°), Cyan (180-210°), Blue (210-270°)
Transitional: Yellow-Green (90-120°), Purple (270-330°)

LAB b-axis Approach (more robust):

b > 20: Warm (yellow-biased)
b < -20: Cool (blue-biased)
-20 ≤ b ≤ 20: Neutral

→ Full details: /references/temperature-classification.md


Arrangement Patterns

| Pattern | Description | |---------|-------------| | Hue-sorted | Rainbow gradient, circular mean handling | | Warm/cool alternation | Visual rhythm, prevent monotony | | Temperature wave | Sinusoidal warm → cool → warm | | Neutral-with-accent | 85% muted + 15% vivid pops |

Palette Compatibility Score:

compatibility = (
    emd_similarity * 0.35 +
    hue_harmony * 0.25 +      # Complementary, analogous, triadic
    lightness_balance * 0.15 +
    chroma_balance * 0.10 +
    temperature_contrast * 0.15
)

→ Full details: /references/arrangement-patterns.md


Diversity Algorithms

Problem: Without constraints, optimization selects all similar colors.

Method 1: Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR)

Score = λ · Harmony(photo, target) - (1-λ) · max(Similarity to selected)
  • λ = 0.7: Balanced (recommended)
  • λ = 1.0: Pure harmony (may select all blues)
  • λ = 0.5: Equal harmony/diversity

Method 2: Determinantal Point Processes (DPP)

  • Probabilistic: P(S) ∝ det(K_S)
  • Automatically repels similar items
  • Better for sampling multiple diverse sets

Method 3: Submodular Maximization

  • Greedy achieves 63% of optimal
  • Theoretical guarantees

→ Full details: /references/diversity-algorithms.md


Global Color Grading

Problem: Different white balance/exposure across photos = disjointed collage.

Affine Color Transform:

# Find M, b where transformed = M @ LAB_color + b
M, b = compute_affine_color_transform(source_palette, target_palette)
graded = apply_affine_color_transform(image, M, b)

# Blend subtly (30% correction)
result = 0.7 * original + 0.3 * graded

→ Full details: /references/arrangement-patterns.md


Implementation Summary

Python Dependencies

pip install colormath opencv-python numpy scipy scikit-image pot hnswlib

| Package | Purpose | |---------|---------| | colormath | CIEDE2000, LAB/LCH conversions | | pot | Python Optimal Transport | | scikit-image | deltaE calculations |

Performance Targets

| Operation | Target | |-----------|--------| | Palette extraction (5 colors) | &lt;50ms | | Sinkhorn EMD (5×5, ε=0.1) | &lt;5ms | | MMR selection (1000 candidates, k=100) | &lt;500ms | | Full collage assembly (100 photos) | &lt;10s |

→ Full details: /references/implementation-guide.md


Your Expertise in Action

When a user asks for help with color-based composition:

  1. Assess Intent:
  • Palette matching for collage?
  • Color temperature arrangement?
  • Diversity-aware selection?
  1. Choose Approach:
  • Sinkhorn EMD for palette compatibility
  • MMR with λ=0.7 for diverse selection
  • Appropriate arrangement pattern
  1. Implement Rigorously:
  • Use LAB/LCH spaces (never raw RGB)
  • CIEDE2000 for perceptual distances
  • Cache palette extractions
  1. Optimize:
  • Adaptive ε for Sinkhorn
  • Progressive matching (dominant → full)
  • Hierarchical clustering by hue

Reference Files

| File | Content | |------|---------| | /references/perceptual-color-spaces.md | LAB, LCH, CIEDE2000, conversions | | /references/optimal-transport.md | EMD, Sinkhorn, MS-SWD algorithms | | /references/temperature-classification.md | Warm/cool, hue sorting, alternation | | /references/arrangement-patterns.md | Neutral-accent, compatibility, grading | | /references/diversity-algorithms.md | MMR, DPP, submodular maximization | | /references/implementation-guide.md | Python deps, Metal shaders, caching |


Related Skills

  • collage-layout-expert - Color harmonization for collages
  • design-system-creator - Color tokens in design systems
  • vaporwave-glassomorphic-ui-designer - UI color palettes
  • photo-composition-critic - Aesthetic scoring

Where perceptual color science meets computational composition.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.