AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Agent Workflow

skill-d-padmanabhan-agent-engineering-handbook-agent-workflow · by d-padmanabhan

Structured development workflow with Plan/Implement/Review phases, QA validation, context management, and audit requirements. Enforces no remote writes, mandatory checkpoints, and verifiable audit reports. Use when working on complex tasks, multi-file changes, or when the user mentions planning, workflow, implementing features, or needs structured development guidance.

No reviews yet
0 installs
38 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-d-padmanabhan-agent-engineering-handbook-agent-workflow

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-d-padmanabhan-agent-engineering-handbook-agent-workflow)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Agent Workflow? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Agent Workflow

Golden Rules

Follow this three-phase approach for all non-trivial work:

  1. PLAN → Design solution → Document approach → WAIT FOR EXPLICIT APPROVAL
  2. IMPLEMENT → Code ONLY what was approved → STOP when agreed scope is complete
  3. REVIEW → Verify results → Suggest improvements → Return to PLAN phase

Critical Violations to Avoid

- DON'T DO THIS:
User: "Can you add authentication?"
AI: [Immediately starts coding without discussion]

+ DO THIS INSTEAD:
User: "Can you add authentication?"
AI: "Let me design a solution first. Key decisions needed:
     - OAuth 2.0 vs local authentication?
     - JWT tokens vs session-based?
     - User data storage location?
     
     Let's agree on the approach before I write any code."

Why This Matters:

  • Skipping planning → Wasted time, wrong solutions, scope creep
  • Implementing unplanned features → Breaking existing code, technical debt
  • Not stopping after agreed scope → Confusion, frustration, rework

Complexity Levels

| Level | Type | Workflow | Example | |-------|------|----------|---------| | 1 | Simple | Direct implementation → Quick review | Fix typo, simple bug fix | | 2 | Moderate | Brief plan → QA → Implement → Review | Add new function | | 3 | Complex | Full Plan → Creative → QA → Implement → Review | Multi-file feature | | 4 | Architectural | Detailed Plan → Creative (mandatory) → QA → Implement → Review | Major refactoring |

Phase 1: Planning

You MUST NOT begin implementation until:

  • [ ] User has explicitly approved the plan
  • [ ] All clarifying questions have been answered
  • [ ] The scope is clearly defined and agreed upon

Process:

  1. Analyze the request - understand scope, constraints, requirements
  2. Check existing code - look for patterns and reusable components
  3. Design the solution - propose approach with alternatives
  4. WAIT FOR APPROVAL - present plan and await confirmation

Key Questions:

  • What is the simplest solution that meets requirements?
  • Can we reuse existing code or patterns?
  • What are the security implications?
  • How will this be tested?

Phase 2: Implementation

Implementation Gate Checks:

  • [ ] Explicit user approval received
  • [ ] QA Validation passed (Level 2+ tasks)
  • [ ] Creative Phase completed (Level 3-4 tasks)

Constraints:

  • Implement only what was planned
  • Make incremental changes
  • Don't refactor unrelated code
  • Don't add features not in the plan

Phase 3: Review

Process:

  1. Review implemented changes - verify they match the plan
  2. Check for issues - security, bugs, edge cases
  3. Suggest improvements - but DON'T implement them yet
  4. Identify cleanup opportunities
  5. Propose next steps

Quick Commands

  • "Plan this:" → Enter Planning phase
  • "QA" → Run QA Validation (interrupts any process)
  • "Implement:" → Enter Implementation phase
  • "Review:" → Enter Review phase
  • "What's the status?" → Check current phase

Audit Requirements

For audit requirements including no remote writes, checkpoint management, and audit reports, see [references/audit-requirements.md](references/audit-requirements.md).

For detailed context management and QA validation, see [references/context-management.md](references/context-management.md).

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.