AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Verification Plan Codex

skill-dachent-skills-verification-plan-codex · by dachent

Use when a plan needs proof criteria before execution, especially coding changes, business deliverables, mixed business-coding projects, acceptance criteria, rollback triggers, manual checks, or final validation design.

— No reviews yet
0 installs
0 views
— view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-dachent-skills-verification-plan-codex

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-dachent-skills-verification-plan-codex)

Reliability & compatibility

✓ Security review passed
0 installs to date
— no reviews yet
● 26d ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Verification Plan Codex? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Codex Verification Plan

Overview

Define how the work will be proven correct before execution starts. A verification plan maps each success criterion to commands, checks, expected results, evidence, and recovery triggers.

Workflow

  1. Read success criteria, failure criteria, out-of-scope boundaries, repo map, evidence catalog, assumption ledger, and the current implementation plan.
  2. Classify validation as software, business, or mixed.
  3. For every success criterion, define at least one proof method.
  4. For every failure criterion, define the signal that would show it happened.
  5. Define rollback or recovery triggers before execution.
  6. Return the verification plan in conversation. Write an artifact only when the user explicitly requests one, and place it in the active session folder or another user-approved destination.

Native Plan Mode

  • Use the current plan, success criteria, failure criteria, and inspected evidence directly; do not require a repository planning workfolder.
  • Use this table shape when a table improves clarity: Criterion, Proof method, Command/check, Expected result, Evidence artifact, Owner/Reviewer, Failure signal, and Recovery trigger.
  • Map every success criterion to at least one proof method and every failure criterion to a failure signal.
  • If a human decision is still required, identify the exact unresolved decision without adding a duplicate execution-approval gate.
  • Do not write files while the current collaboration mode prohibits mutations.

References

Read as needed:

  • references/software-validation.md for tests, builds, static checks, smoke checks, and command output.
  • references/business-validation.md for stakeholder acceptance, source reconciliation, document checks, and calculation checks.
  • references/rollback-and-recovery.md for Git and no-Git recovery strategies.

Minimum Output

Include:

  • criterion identifier;
  • proof method;
  • command or manual check;
  • expected result;
  • evidence artifact;
  • owner or reviewer if human review is required;
  • failure signal;
  • rollback or recovery trigger.

Red Flags

Do not accept vague checks such as "test it manually", "review output", "run the app", or "stakeholder approves" without defining the specific evidence that makes the check pass.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.