Install
$ agentstack add skill-daddia-claude-for-strategy-hypothesis-tree ✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.
Security review
✓ PassedNo issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →
- ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
- ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
- ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
- ✓ Untrusted network calls
- ✓ Known-malicious package signatures
What it can access
- ✓ Network access No
- ✓ Filesystem access No
- ✓ Shell / process execution No
- ✓ Environment & secrets No
- ✓ Dynamic code execution No
From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.
About
Hypothesis Tree
When to use
Break a problem into falsifiable root and MECE sub-hypotheses before analysis. See ../../references/hypothesis-driven-approach.md.
What this skill does not do
- Does not run analysis — names evidence needed;
workplan-builderexecutes. - Does not use topic labels as nodes — every node falsifiable.
- Does not keep branches with no so-what either direction — cut and list.
Preconditions
| Input | If missing | |---|---| | Problem as question | Restate and confirm before tree | | Root hypothesis ambiguity | Present both roots; ask which to build |
Provisional mode
Uncertain root: two candidate roots with user choice; label structured first pass.
Trust spine
- Analytical Rigor (mandatory): MECE sub-hypotheses; evidence-needed per branch; cut branches listed.
- Confidence bands (
hypothesis-driven-analysis): High = triangulated evidence plan; Medium = single source; Low = assumption-driven — label load-bearing assumption. - Per
trust-conventions.mdfor sourcing, numbers, gate.
Workflow
- Restate problem as question; confirm.
- Propose falsifiable root hypothesis.
- 3–5 MECE sub-hypotheses.
- Smallest evidence test per sub-hypothesis.
- So-what if TRUE and if FALSE; cut if neither matters.
- Output as tree.
Output format
ROOT HYPOTHESIS: [falsifiable claim]
1. [Sub-hypothesis 1]
Evidence needed: [...]
If TRUE: [...]
If FALSE: [...]
...
Cut branches: [...]
Worked example
Input: "Why did mid-tier churn spike?"
Excerpt: Root: price increase caused mid-tier churn. Sub-hypothesis: elasticity >15% in segment; evidence: cohort comparison Q1 vs Q4.
Quality checks before delivering
- [ ] Falsifiable nodes only
- [ ] MECE check explicit
- [ ] Cut branches documented
- [ ] Handoff-ready for workplan-builder
Propose profile update
When a stable convention surfaces during this run (thresholds, naming, tone, output format, or recurring corrections), propose a profile update: show the exact diff against ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-strategy/consulting/CLAUDE.md (org-wide facts go to org-profile.md), ask for confirmation, and write only on yes. Only /consulting:practice-setup auto-applies a full profile write.
Outputs
Follows plugin CLAUDE.md § Outputs. Next: /consulting:workplan-builder.
Source & license
This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.
- Author: daddia
- Source: daddia/claude-for-strategy
- License: MIT
Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.
Reviews
No reviews yet — be the first.
Write a review
Versions
- v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.