AgentStack
Sign in Publish
MCP servers Skills Toolkits Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Narrative Builder

skill-daddia-claude-for-strategy-narrative-builder · by daddia

>

↗ Repository
— No reviews yet
0 installs
3 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-daddia-claude-for-strategy-narrative-builder

✓ scanned · ✓ verified — works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • ✓ Prompt-injection patterns
  • ✓ Secret / credential exfiltration
  • ✓ Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • ✓ Untrusted network calls
  • ✓ Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • ✓ Network access No
  • ✓ Filesystem access No
  • ✓ Shell / process execution No
  • ✓ Environment & secrets No
  • ✓ Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

Are you the author of Narrative Builder? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

Narrative Builder

When to use

Turn raw input into Minto pyramid: governing thought, 3–5 MECE key line points, support bullets. See ../../references/minto-pyramid.md.

What this skill does not do

  • Does not produce prose memo/deck — skeleton for deck-outline / exec-memo.
  • Does not paper over gaps — flags unsupported governing thoughts.
  • Does not guess reader question — ask if unclear.

Preconditions

| Input | If missing | |---|---| | Raw findings/notes | Ask user to provide | | Reader's real question | Ask before structuring | | Practice profile | Default inductive; flag practice-setup |

Provisional mode

Thin input: governing thought flagged [review]; Known gaps section required.

Trust spine

  • Analytical Rigor (mandatory): Outline not prose; MECE gaps/overlaps named; grouping logic stated.
  • Per trust-conventions.md.

Workflow

  1. Read practice profile.
  2. State reader's question explicitly.
  3. Draft governing thought (answer, not topic).
  4. 3–5 MECE key line points; state deductive vs inductive.
  5. Support sub-bullets with so-what test.
  6. Flag structural problems in source — don't silently fix.

Output format

GOVERNING THOUGHT: [...]

1. [Key line point 1]
   - [Support]
2. [...]

Grouping logic: [deductive | inductive] — [rationale]
Known gaps / flags: [...]

Worked example

Input: Interview notes on pricing. Question: should we revert mid-tier increase?

Excerpt: Governing thought answers revert yes; three MECE key lines; gap flagged: no competitor primary research.

Quality checks before delivering

  • [ ] Governing thought is the answer
  • [ ] MECE explicit
  • [ ] Outline format, not paragraphs
  • [ ] Gaps flagged

Propose profile update

When a stable convention surfaces during this run (thresholds, naming, tone, output format, or recurring corrections), propose a profile update: show the exact diff against ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-strategy/consulting/CLAUDE.md (org-wide facts go to org-profile.md), ask for confirmation, and write only on yes. Only /consulting:practice-setup auto-applies a full profile write.

Outputs

Follows plugin CLAUDE.md § Outputs. Next: /consulting:deck-outline or /consulting:exec-memo.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet — be the first.

Write a review

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.

More in Agent Skills