AgentStack
Browse Sign in
Browse Why AgentStack Sell Docs
Sign in
SKILL verified MIT Self-run

Ux Design Review

skill-daddia-skills-ux-design-review · by daddia

>

No reviews yet
0 installs
39 views
0.0% view→install

Install

$ agentstack add skill-daddia-skills-ux-design-review

✓ scanned · ✓ verified, works with Claude Code, Cursor, and more.

Security review

✓ Passed

No issues found. Passed automated security review. · v0.1.0 How review works →

  • Prompt-injection patterns
  • Secret / credential exfiltration
  • Dangerous shell & filesystem operations
  • Untrusted network calls
  • Known-malicious package signatures

What it can access

  • Network access No
  • Filesystem access No
  • Shell / process execution No
  • Environment & secrets No
  • Dynamic code execution No

From automated source analysis of v0.1.0. “Used” means the capability is present in the source — more access means more to trust, not that it’s unsafe.

View the full security report →

Verified badge

Passed review? Show it. Paste this badge into your README, it links to the public security report.

AgentStack Verified badge Links to your public security report.
[![AgentStack Verified](https://agentstack.voostack.com/badges/verified.svg)](https://agentstack.voostack.com/security/report/skill-daddia-skills-ux-design-review)

Reliability & compatibility

Security review passed
0 installs to date
no reviews yet
2mo ago

Declared compatibility

Claude CodeClaude Desktop

Compatibility is declared by the source manifest. End-to-end runtime verification is coming, see below.

Preview Execution monitoring

We're building live execution health for every listing: tool-call success rate, median latency, uptime, and last-checked timestamps, measured, not self-reported. It isn't live yet, so we don't show numbers we can't stand behind.

How agent discovery & health will work →
Are you the author of Ux Design Review? Claim this listing to set pricing, connect Stripe payouts, and keep 70% of every sale.
Sign up to claim

About

UX design review

Review the rendered UX of a UI change against its design source; or address findings from a prior UX review.

This is the experience sibling of code-review: code-review judges a diff's correctness, security, and acceptance criteria; this skill judges what the user actually sees and operates. On a frontend change, run both.

Method: live environment first

Judge the interactive experience before the code. Resolve a runnable UI per [references/environment-resolution.md](references/environment-resolution.md) and drive it with a real browser (Playwright/Chromium, or the host's browser MCP tools). When nothing runs, degrade to a static review and state the reduced coverage in the verdict — never silently skip live checks.

Sub-agents

For multi-component diffs or pre-PR review, spawn in parallel (Claude Code agents or Cursor Task):

| Agent | File | Focus | | ----- | ---- | ----- | | accessibility-reviewer | [agents/accessibility-reviewer.md](agents/accessibility-reviewer.md) | WCAG 2.2 AA — axe-core scan + manual keyboard/focus/semantics pass | | interaction-states-reviewer | [agents/interaction-states-reviewer.md](agents/interaction-states-reviewer.md) | User flows; hover/focus/disabled; loading/empty/error; robustness; console | | design-fidelity-reviewer | [agents/design-fidelity-reviewer.md](agents/design-fidelity-reviewer.md) | Rendered UI vs the resolved design source (Figma/mockups/tokens) | | responsive-reviewer | [agents/responsive-reviewer.md](agents/responsive-reviewer.md) | Breakpoints, overflow, touch targets, dark mode / reduced motion | | design-system-reviewer | [agents/design-system-reviewer.md](agents/design-system-reviewer.md) | Static pass: tokens vs hard-coded values, component reuse, pattern adherence |

Spawn only the agents whose triggers fire — do not run all five on every diff:

| Condition | Spawn | | --------- | ----- | | Whenever spawning (default lenses) | accessibility-reviewer, interaction-states-reviewer | | Design source resolved (Figma link, mockups, specs) | design-fidelity-reviewer | | Diff touches layout, CSS, or breakpoints | responsive-reviewer | | Repo has a design system, tokens file, or component library | design-system-reviewer |

Small diffs (one component, few states) skip spawning and use the inline steps in [prompts/run.prompt.md](prompts/run.prompt.md). Merge agent outputs into one verdict. Resolve the design source and the live environment once up front (see the references) and share both with every sub-agent — do not re-resolve per agent.

References

  • [references/design-source-resolution.md](references/design-source-resolution.md) — discover the design truth: Figma MCP, mockups, tokens, style guide, or none
  • [references/environment-resolution.md](references/environment-resolution.md) — get a runnable UI and drive it; the degradation ladder to static review
  • [references/accessibility-checklist.md](references/accessibility-checklist.md) — condensed WCAG 2.2 AA, split automatable vs manual
  • [references/ux-heuristics.md](references/ux-heuristics.md) — visual hierarchy, consistency, interaction standards: the bar when no design source exists
  • [references/finding-classification.md](references/finding-classification.md) — UX categories, severity, confidence + risk matrix

Router

  1. Mode: default review, or fix.
  2. One prompt under [prompts/](prompts/).

review (default) — [prompts/run.prompt.md](prompts/run.prompt.md).

fix — [prompts/fix.prompt.md](prompts/fix.prompt.md). Optional action-tier threshold after fix: blocking (blocking only) or warning (blocking + warning); default (or all) addresses all findings.

Pass a branch, PR, running-app URL, or Figma node URL after the mode token. Default review scope: the UI touched by git diff.

Source & license

This open-source skill is cataloged on AgentStack and links to its original source — we do not rehost the code.

Install and usage instructions live in the source repository linked above.

Reviews

No reviews yet, be the first.

Versions

  • v0.1.0 Imported from the upstream source.